Microsoft System Center and Datadog compete in IT infrastructure monitoring and management. Datadog appears to have the upper hand due to its strong support for cloud services and real-time analytics capabilities.
Features: Microsoft System Center excels in integrating with Microsoft products, effective automation, and user-friendly tools for Windows environments. It includes comprehensive configuration ease, availability monitoring, and antivirus administration. Datadog provides comprehensive dashboards, seamless integrations with AWS, Docker, and Splunk, and intuitive tagging for robust visualization. It includes distributed tracing, logging, and API integration.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center struggles with non-Microsoft integrations, cumbersome installation, and multi-tenant configuration complexity. Users seek better documentation and performance optimization. Datadog faces challenges in its pricing model, real-time data insights, and ease of customization. Users desire improved cost control and expanded security features while noting difficulties for non-technical users in mobile environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center is well-suited for on-premises Windows-based deployments, often bundled in enterprise agreements, with mixed reviews on customer support. Datadog performs well in public and hybrid cloud scenarios, offering flexibility and scalability. Users commend Datadog's readiness in customer service but express concerns about additional charges for advanced features.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center has high upfront licensing costs offset by its integration in Microsoft environments, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing outsourcing expenses. Datadog employs a usage-based pricing model, providing precise cost allocations but challenging predictability, sometimes resulting in higher expenses. It's essential for buyers to assess volume and scale to manage costs effectively for an optimal ROI.
As a partner, I cannot create a ticket directly; I have to involve the end user's email to create one, so using the Software Assurance ID to create a ticket directly is not possible, making it very challenging for me.
Microsoft System Center is scalable, allowing integration even if I have different sites.
In future updates, I would like to see AI features included in Datadog for monitoring AI spend and usage to make the product more versatile and appealing for the customer.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
The disadvantage of Microsoft System Center is related to the many integrated services; if one service is failing, then all features will be affected.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
In Microsoft System Center, all the features are integrated already, whereas in ManageEngine, you have to license each feature individually to access those features.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Datadog | 8.5% |
Microsoft System Center | 0.4% |
Other | 91.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 78 |
Midsize Enterprise | 42 |
Large Enterprise | 82 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 7 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 10 |
Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.
Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.
What are Datadog's Key Features?In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.