JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft System Center comparison

Red Hat and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Red Hat is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.3, while Microsoft is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8. Red Hat holds a 8.7% mindshare in AIS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 7 JBoss Enterprise Application Platform reviews

1,396 Views
1,220 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center

Read 19 Microsoft System Center reviews

189 Views
100 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Microsoft System Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft System Center compete in enterprise solutions. Microsoft System Center has the upper hand with its advanced functionality and comprehensive management features.

Features: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform focuses on middleware capabilities with strong application development, effective clustering, and load balancing. Microsoft System Center offers automation, third-party management pack integration, and extensive system monitoring.

Room for Improvement: JBoss could enhance integration with other tools, improve support documentation, and streamline its user interface. Microsoft System Center could simplify initial setup, enhance third-party support beyond Microsoft products, and improve its scalability for large deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JBoss provides straightforward deployment and good customer support but requires expertise for optimal use. Microsoft System Center offers robust deployment support and strong customer service but involves more complexity initially.

Pricing and ROI: JBoss is cost-effective with favorable pricing and good ROI, appealing to smaller enterprises. Microsoft System Center has higher initial costs but potentially offers greater ROI for larger organizations through its expansive features.

To learn more, read our detailed JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft System Center

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is 8.7%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Gustavo Magni

lead architect at Sys Manager

Stable solution with an easy initial setup process

We use the solution for the deployment of Java-based applications The solution helps my organization with simple and fast deployments. The solution is easy to configure and deploy. The solution's architecture needs improvement. Also, there could be more integration with container platforms. We…

Read full review

Ajinkya Mohod

System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv

Makes user management and application management easy for users

Speaking about the impact of the automation feature that impacted our company's operational efficiency, I can say that the complete tool works on automation. You just have to configure it, and it works, especially in areas like auto-patching updates. I suggest that others can definitely go ahead with Microsoft System Center, especially beginners who choose it, can get hands-on experience with it, and acquire a good understanding of how things work. In terms of the value and benefits derived from the use of the solution, I can say that my company's operations have been made simpler because of the product, especially in areas like user management and application management where we have been benefited a lot. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"JBoss Enterprise Application Platform works very well."

"Its technical support is excellent."

"It's convenient and barebone."

"The most valuable aspect of JBoss EAP is its support for clustering and load balancing, which is essential for our applications that serve multiple users simultaneously."

"The solution is quite stable."

"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."

"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."

"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."

"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."

"Managment Packs for Microsoft-specific products, help us implement the best practices for each product."

"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date."

"The detail in the alarms is great."

More Microsoft System Center pros

Cons

"Lacks some functional requirements."

"A graphic user interface can be added."

"Its architecture needs improvement."

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."

"This solution needs better management UI."

"Improvement is needed in the synchronization between cluster nodes, especially under network strain."

"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."

"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times."

"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."

"For me, the tool's UI seems to be too old."

"Could be more user friendly."

"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."

More Microsoft System Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source solution."

"While I am not directly involved with the financial aspects, JBoss is known for its reasonable subscription pricing. Potential users should consider whether the cost aligns with their budget and requirements."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"We maximized our license investment."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

The solution is quite stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

Improvement is needed in the synchronization between cluster nodes, especially under network strain. Enhanced stability in cluster management and better error handling during unexpected network cha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

We use JBoss primarily for public institutions involved in customs. Our environment does not use cutting-edge technologies; instead, we continue to utilize JBoss due to our clients' preference for ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software depl...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 84% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Web Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 4% of the time

IBM BPM vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 52% of the time

IBM BPM vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 48% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

March 2025

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report

Download JBoss Enterprise Application Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center

April 2025

Download Microsoft System Center product report

Also Known As

JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP

MS System Center

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAPâs architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).

Red Hat

System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center

April 2025

Free Report: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center

Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.