

Microsoft System Center and LogicMonitor compete in the IT management and monitoring category. LogicMonitor seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced customization features, flexibility, and user-friendly data visualization capabilities.
Features: Microsoft System Center integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products, offers automation, detailed management options, and robust monitoring tools. Its low learning curve is a notable strength. LogicMonitor excels with advanced dashboards, customizable data visualization, and extensive third-party integrations. Its robust reporting capabilities and logic modules offer ease of monitoring across diverse environments.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center faces challenges with integration outside the Microsoft ecosystem, has room for improvement in documentation, and platform performance could be enhanced. LogicMonitor could benefit from upgrades in reporting and dashboard capabilities, has role-based permission limitations, and could integrate more explicit data visualization features and alert suppression.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center's on-premises deployment is complex and presents challenges. Its technical support requires responsiveness improvements. LogicMonitor's flexibility with both on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions offers a more adaptable deployment model. While its customer support is adequate, it needs to be more proactive in resolving issues.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center is known for high licensing fees but offers significant ROI in reduced external dependency. LogicMonitor, though not the most budget-friendly, provides a flexible pay-per-device pricing model, facilitating scalability. It can be costlier in large environments, especially when compared to alternatives like SolarWinds.
The return is more of value and savings in preventing costly downtime, making the savings of about $60,000 which we would have lost without LogicMonitor, and in IT staff efficiency, we save approximately 15 hours a week.
Because of LogicMonitor, we have reduced our EC2 infrastructure significantly, which has helped us reduce costs by 20%.
I can definitely notice a difference in our posture, uptime, and ability to solve problems and resolve outages much quicker since we have had LogicMonitor in place.
Customer support is on point and very well trained.
We need to be able to reach them in real-time, and without those kinds of options available, we have to set up ad hoc calls, which could be improved.
I can send emails to them and they will reply within 24 hours.
As a partner, I cannot create a ticket directly; I have to involve the end user's email to create one, so using the Software Assurance ID to create a ticket directly is not possible, making it very challenging for me.
They are not licensed, so you could deploy one collector or 1,000 collectors for the same cost.
LogicMonitor's scalability absolutely meets our organization's growth needs.
LogicMonitor is pretty good at scaling things when it comes to monitoring AWS infrastructure because I can see that it scales very well for us.
Microsoft System Center is scalable, allowing integration even if I have different sites.
The platform is reliable, alerts are consistent, and once collectors and integrations are in place, monitoring runs smoothly with minimal disruption.
It is very stable. I have never seen LogicMonitor itself go down.
Since we implemented LogicMonitor and got it working in production, there has been no downtime, no reliability issues, and nothing major regarding flare-ups from LogicMonitor's perspective.
I would also appreciate a stronger out-of-the-box AWS correlation, such as automatically grouping related issues across EC2, EBS, and ALBs in a way that reads as a single incident story.
I wish the user interface would be customizable to allow users to create personal context-specific workspaces to hide irrelevant data, rather than trying to have a one-size-fits-all interface.
The container monitoring seems to be really behind compared to some bespoke cloud-native monitoring solutions that are designed around Kubernetes, containers, and ephemeral environments.
The disadvantage of Microsoft System Center is related to the many integrated services; if one service is failing, then all features will be affected.
For small businesses that want to utilize LogicMonitor and are just starting out with limited customers, a pricing model targeted to this segment would be beneficial, perhaps at three or two dollars per device per month.
I experienced no issues with pricing, setup cost, and licensing; it was very transparent, and the licensing model is very clear and easy to understand.
The dynamic alerting and root cause analysis have helped us fix issues before they cause a full-blown outage or degrade performance for end users.
Our SLAs and SLOs were averaging about 10 to 15 failed SLAs and SLOs that were over the time allotted to get those resolved, and those are now down to about two to three per week.
When talking about the statistics, it has helped us reduce downtime to about 40 to 50% because without LogicMonitor, we used to know about the downtime only when the application was actually down.
In Microsoft System Center, all the features are integrated already, whereas in ManageEngine, you have to license each feature individually to access those features.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| LogicMonitor | 2.8% |
| Microsoft System Center | 0.7% |
| Other | 96.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
LogicMonitor offers flexible IT monitoring with customizable dashboards and robust alerting capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with third-party apps like ServiceNow and provides a single-pane view for diverse IT environments, aiding in proactive issue resolution and enhancing operational efficiency.
LogicMonitor stands out with its capability to monitor diverse infrastructures including Cisco Voice systems, data centers, and virtual environments. Supporting servers, storage, networking devices, and applications, it provides seamless integration with cloud services like AWS and Azure. Users leverage its scalability and flexibility, benefiting from dynamic thresholds, anomaly detection, and detailed visualization. All these features contribute to improved management of IT assets and streamlined operations. Users suggest improvements in mapping, reporting, and automation for remediation, desiring more customizations and an expansive application performance monitoring toolset.
What are LogicMonitor's key features?LogicMonitor is widely implemented across industries, providing monitoring for infrastructure in sectors like telecommunications, cloud computing, and managed services. Managed service providers particularly value its ability to track client environments, deliver proactive alerts, and generate comprehensive reports, while its integration with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure offers users centralized management and visibility into IT assets worldwide.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.