Catchpoint vs Microsoft System Center comparison

Catchpoint and Microsoft are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Catchpoint is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4. Catchpoint holds a 0.7% mindshare in CMS, compared to Microsoft’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,492 Views
537 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center

Read 20 Microsoft System Center reviews

469 Views
272 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Microsoft System Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Microsoft System Center and Catchpoint are enterprise solutions, each excelling in distinct areas. Microsoft System Center tends to have an upper hand for businesses deeply integrated with Microsoft products, while Catchpoint is favored for detailed end-user monitoring.

Features: Microsoft System Center integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products, providing advanced automation and support for third-party hypervisors. It offers invaluable availability monitoring and management capabilities. Catchpoint provides efficient alerting and sophisticated synthetic monitoring of transaction paths and APIs. Its detailed monitoring dashboards offer significant visibility.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center could improve in integrating non-Microsoft products, interface enhancement, and installation documentation. Catchpoint's interface needs streamlining, further automation for its API, and reduction in setup time for tests.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center primarily offers on-premises and hybrid deployment options, while Catchpoint offers flexible, public cloud-focused deployments. Catchpoint generally requires less technical support and has more responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center involves high costs due to licensing and support but offers substantial ROI through efficiencies. Catchpoint's transparent point-based pricing is often high, yet it delivers significant operational savings for enterprises needing extensive monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Microsoft System Center Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Microsoft System Center

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (38th), Network Monitoring Software (60th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Microsoft System Center

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at Capgemini

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

Ajinkya Mohod

System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv

Makes user management and application management easy for users

Speaking about the impact of the automation feature that impacted our company's operational efficiency, I can say that the complete tool works on automation. You just have to configure it, and it works, especially in areas like auto-patching updates. I suggest that others can definitely go ahead with Microsoft System Center, especially beginners who choose it, can get hands-on experience with it, and acquire a good understanding of how things work. In terms of the value and benefits derived from the use of the solution, I can say that my company's operations have been made simpler because of the product, especially in areas like user management and application management where we have been benefited a lot. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"During business hours, it has worked absolutely fine without any issues."

"Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

More Catchpoint pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it helps us manage our company's application pool, license pool, application update pool, and OS updates."

"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."

"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure)."

"Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure."

"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date."

"The detail in the alarms is great."

More Microsoft System Center pros

Cons

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"A large selection of nodes are available but it is a challenge to test reliably in China and the Middle East."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

More Catchpoint cons

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Could be more user friendly."

"Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there."

"They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution."

"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times."

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."

"System Center hasn't updated to keep up with the industry. It needs improvements in the user interface, ease of use, and overall product functionality, particularly the cloud-monitoring features. It needs more capabilities to monitor AWS and Azure infrastructure."

More Microsoft System Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"We maximized our license investment."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Retailer

15%

Real Estate/Law Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software depl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 38% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 27% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 19% of the time

IBM BPM vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 15% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

August 2025

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center

August 2025

Download Microsoft System Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

MS System Center

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Microsoft System Center

July 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Microsoft System Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Microsoft System Center report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.