Microsoft System Center vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Microsoft and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4, while Kovai.co is ranked #49. Microsoft holds a 0.4% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kovai.co’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.

Microsoft System Center

Read 19 Microsoft System Center reviews

469 Views
272 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

529 Views
238 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Microsoft System Center and Turbo360 offer comprehensive IT management solutions. Turbo360 has an edge in managing serverless environments effectively, particularly in agile cloud solutions.

Features: Microsoft System Center provides complete infrastructure management, seamless integration with Microsoft applications, and strong monitoring capabilities. Turbo360 offers transaction tracking, detailed analytics for cloud-native applications, and specialized features for serverless computing. The main distinction is Turbo360's serverless application focus contrasted with System Center's broader IT infrastructure management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Turbo360 provides expedited deployment tailored for cloud environments and accessible customer service. Microsoft System Center requires more time and resources due to its extensive configuration, but offers thorough infrastructure integration. Turbo360's advantage is its streamlined setup for serverless platforms.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center involves higher setup costs due to comprehensive capabilities but can deliver significant ROI within Microsoft-centric environments. Turbo360 has lower setup costs and offers scalable pricing models for serverless management while being cost-effective for cloud management tasks. The key difference lies in the setup investment, with Turbo360 offering economical solutions and System Center providing extensive options for large-scale IT environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft System Center vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft System Center

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (13th)

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (69th), Cloud Management (52nd), Cloud Cost Management (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft System Center is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ajinkya Mohod

System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv

Makes user management and application management easy for users

Speaking about the impact of the automation feature that impacted our company's operational efficiency, I can say that the complete tool works on automation. You just have to configure it, and it works, especially in areas like auto-patching updates. I suggest that others can definitely go ahead with Microsoft System Center, especially beginners who choose it, can get hands-on experience with it, and acquire a good understanding of how things work. In terms of the value and benefits derived from the use of the solution, I can say that my company's operations have been made simpler because of the product, especially in areas like user management and application management where we have been benefited a lot. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1868589

Python Engineer at Msys Technologies

Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits

Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications. One more thing to note is that their support team was always ready to clear all our doubts regarding the product but we feel that it would be much appreciated if they could share with us the required resources to get new customers like us well-versed in traversing through different modules of the product. These are the very few areas where Serverless360 can be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool has many valuable features, including license tracking, software deployment, and installation deployment. However, we primarily use it for Windows updates and deployment for Windows servers and desktops. It's a complex product but very well-managed. If you use all the features, they will be valuable to your organization. It allows you to deploy desktops, manage patches, and track various features."

"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."

"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."

"It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure)."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The installation process is easy."

"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."

More Microsoft System Center pros

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

Cons

"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

"System Center hasn't updated to keep up with the industry. It needs improvements in the user interface, ease of use, and overall product functionality, particularly the cloud-monitoring features. It needs more capabilities to monitor AWS and Azure infrastructure."

"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."

"Could be more user friendly."

"They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution."

"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."

"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."

More Microsoft System Center cons

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"We maximized our license investment."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

35%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software depl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 38% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 27% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 19% of the time

IBM BPM vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 15% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Competitors

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 60% of the time

Grafana vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 40% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center

August 2025

Download Microsoft System Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Also Known As

MS System Center

Serverless360

Overview

System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.

Microsoft

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

Our Core features:

Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.

Kovai.co

Sample Customers

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft System Center vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft System Center vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft System Center vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.