Microsoft System Center and PRTG Network Monitor compete in the IT management and monitoring category. PRTG Network Monitor has the upper hand due to its versatile monitoring capabilities and user-friendly deployment.
Features: Microsoft System Center offers comprehensive tools for automation and third-party hypervisor control, ideal for Windows environments. It integrates well with Microsoft products, facilitating updates and monitoring. PRTG Network Monitor is known for its rapid deployment, scalability, and diverse monitoring capabilities without requiring complex customization. It provides detailed network performance insights and is cost-effective with strong support for various operating systems.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center struggles with non-Microsoft product integration and has a cumbersome interface that impacts usability. Its documentation is outdated, and it demands significant computing resources. PRTG Network Monitor could improve in application monitoring, report customization, and dashboard flexibility. Enhanced support for advanced monitoring features and integration with modern technologies would be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center primarily supports on-premises deployment, lacking flexibility for diverse infrastructure. Users find customer service engagement demanding, with slow response times. PRTG Network Monitor supports hybrid and public cloud deployment, with an easy setup process noted for user-friendliness. However, its support engagement could be improved, with users often relying on forums for help.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center is relatively costly due to yearly licensing and support contracts but offers substantial ROI through automation. PRTG Network Monitor stands as a cost-effective solution with flexible licensing and all-inclusive packages, supporting a perpetual licensing model beneficial for long-term use. Both products provide considerable ROI, with PRTG appealing to businesses seeking budget-friendly options.
The setup process is well-documented, making it easy to deploy.
Tutorials are available so I can manage any issue with PRTG Network Monitor easily.
On a scale of one to ten, scalability is rated as 9.5.
PRTG Network Monitor has the ability to scale and add new devices.
For less than one hundred devices, it is stable.
PRTG Network Monitor can sometimes be too detailed and cluttered at the beginning, making it heavy to use.
They need to improve application performance monitoring, error tracing mechanisms, and log management.
PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time.
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor.
It's not too high, nor too low, but it's reasonable.
Pricing is by the number of devices, not by sensor.
PRTG Network Monitor already provided me with 100 free sensors, which is enough for my network monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor is easy to set up. Within a few minutes, it is operational.
It is advantageous because it can be deployed on-premises.
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.
To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.