Kaseya Traverse vs Microsoft System Center comparison

Kaseya and Microsoft are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Kaseya is ranked #37 with an average rating of 6.3, while Microsoft is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.8. Kaseya holds a 0.4% mindshare in CMS, compared to Microsoft’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Kaseya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

359 Views
6 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center

Read 19 Microsoft System Center reviews

248 Views
18 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Microsoft System Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Microsoft System Center and Kaseya Traverse compete in the IT management software category. Microsoft System Center has the upper hand in feature richness and integration with Microsoft products, while Kaseya Traverse stands out for its flexibility and pricing.

Features: Microsoft System Center offers integration with Microsoft products, ease of configuration, and robust automation for Windows environments. It provides comprehensive management packs and excels in OS deployment. Kaseya Traverse provides effective IT stack visualization, network and application monitoring, and remote support, known for its processing capabilities and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center has challenges with non-Microsoft product integration, a cumbersome installation process, and outdated UI. Its cloud-monitoring performance needs improvement. Kaseya Traverse lacks a configuration management database, struggles with patch management post-updates, and its reporting is basic with integration issues causing false positives.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center focuses on on-premises deployment, sometimes complicating setup despite hybrid options. Customer support satisfaction varies, often requiring consultancy. Kaseya Traverse supports both on-premises and hybrid environments, allowing cloud integration flexibility, though its support is criticized for delays and inadequate engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center is expensive with annual licensing and additional support costs. It offers ROI through task automation and reduced third-party dependencies. Kaseya Traverse is competitively priced, with a straightforward monthly licensing model, providing savings compared to other solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaseya Traverse vs. Microsoft System Center Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse vs. Microsoft System Center

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

37th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (68th)

Microsoft System Center

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Ajinkya Mohod

System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv

Makes user management and application management easy for users

Speaking about the impact of the automation feature that impacted our company's operational efficiency, I can say that the complete tool works on automation. You just have to configure it, and it works, especially in areas like auto-patching updates. I suggest that others can definitely go ahead with Microsoft System Center, especially beginners who choose it, can get hands-on experience with it, and acquire a good understanding of how things work. In terms of the value and benefits derived from the use of the solution, I can say that my company's operations have been made simpler because of the product, especially in areas like user management and application management where we have been benefited a lot. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."

"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."

"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."

"The installation process is easy."

"Managment Packs for Microsoft-specific products, help us implement the best practices for each product."

"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date."

"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."

"Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure."

More Microsoft System Center pros

Cons

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

"System Center hasn't updated to keep up with the industry. It needs improvements in the user interface, ease of use, and overall product functionality, particularly the cloud-monitoring features. It needs more capabilities to monitor AWS and Azure infrastructure."

"For me, the tool's UI seems to be too old."

"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."

"Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."

"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."

More Microsoft System Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"We maximized our license investment."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

27%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Non Profit

Wholesaler/Distributor

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software depl...

See all answers

Comparisons

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 38% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 22% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 21% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 19% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 54% of the time

IBM BPM vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 46% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

June 2025

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center

June 2025

Download Microsoft System Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

MS System Center

Overview

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse vs. Microsoft System Center

June 2025

Free Report: Kaseya Traverse vs. Microsoft System Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaseya Traverse vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaseya Traverse vs. Microsoft System Center report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.