SharePoint Reviews

My main use case for SharePoint is storing data, and it has primarily served as our document management and team collaboration platform. I have used it to organize and share documents, manage version control, and ensure that my team has access to the latest files in a structured way.

In one of my projects, we used SharePoint as a centralized document repository for our team, where we stored all project-related documents including API specifications, design documents, and release notes. For collaboration, we organized files into structured folders based on modules and enabled version control so that every update was tracked. This helped avoid confusion over multiple document versions. We also set role-based permissions so only specific team members could edit critical documents while others had read access, ensuring data consistency and security. Additionally, the team used SharePoint to share updates and maintain documentation, which made onboarding new team members much easier since everything was available in one place.

Along with documentation, document management, and collaborations, I have seen SharePoint as a useful platform for maintaining structured knowledge within a team. For example, I keep reusable documents such as onboarding guides, troubleshooting steps, and standard operating procedures in one place. I have also explored how SharePoint can support basic workflows such as approval processes for documents, which helps maintain consistency and governance. From a backend perspective, I am particularly interested in leveraging the integration capabilities with AI and automation tools to streamline processes further.

SharePoint has had a very positive impact on my organization, specifically in terms of collaboration and efficiency. One of the biggest improvements is centralized document management, where all project-related files are stored in one place, making it easy for everyone to access the latest information without confusion. It has also improved my team's collaboration since multiple users can work on a document with proper version control, reducing duplicates and errors. Another key benefit is better access control and security, ensuring that sensitive information is only available to the right person. The additional tool integration with tools including Microsoft Teams and Outlook has streamlined communication and made workflow more efficient. Overall, it has helped improve productivity, reduce manual efforts, and make knowledge sharing much more structured.

In terms of best features, there are several powerful features, especially for collaboration and content management. One of the best features is document management, including version controls, check-in, check-out, and centralized storage, which ensures teams always work on the latest files. Other key features include role-based access and permissions, allowing secure sharing of content with proper control over who can edit and view the document. SharePoint also provides team collaboration tools including shared sites and document libraries, which make it easy for the team to work together in a structured way. Additionally, workflows and automation capabilities are very useful. For example, I can set up approval processes for documents. From a broader perspective, integrations with Microsoft tools including Microsoft Teams, Outlook, and Power Automate make it even more powerful and adaptable in enterprise environments.

The feature I use the most is document management with version control, which is extremely valuable in my daily work because multiple team members often collaborate on the same documents such as API specifications and design documents. Version control ensures that I always have access to the latest version while still maintaining a history of changes. If something goes wrong, I can easily track or revert to the previous version. I also avoid confusion caused by multiple copies of the same files, which is very common when documents are shared over email or local storage. Overall, it helps maintain consistency, improves collaboration, and saves a lot of time.

One additional aspect I would highlight is how well SharePoint balances flexibility with structure. While it provides strong document management and collaboration features, it also allows teams to customize sites, libraries, and workflows based on their needs. Another important aspect is its seamless integrations with tools including Microsoft Teams and Power Automate, which help extend its capabilities into communication and automation. Overall, it is a very versatile platform that supports both day-to-day collaborations and more structured business processes.

SharePoint has had a very positive impact on my organization, specifically in terms of collaboration and efficiency. One of the biggest improvements is centralized document management, where all project-related files are stored in one place, making it easy for everyone to access the latest information without confusion. It has also improved my team's collaboration since multiple users can work on a document with proper version control, reducing duplicates and errors. Another key benefit is better access control and security, ensuring that sensitive information is only available to the right person. The additional tool integration with tools including Microsoft Teams and Outlook has streamlined communication and made workflow more efficient. Overall, it has helped improve productivity, reduce manual efforts, and make knowledge sharing much more structured.

SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger.

One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.

I have a total experience of almost five years in my current field. I have used SharePoint for a total of two years.

SharePoint is quite stable, specifically when using SharePoint Online with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. From my experience, it offers high availability and reliability, and I have not faced any major downtime issues. Microsoft manages the infrastructure, so updates, patches, and maintenance are handled seamlessly in the background.

In terms of scalability, SharePoint is highly scalable, especially when used as SharePoint Online within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. Since it runs on Microsoft Cloud infrastructure, it can easily handle growth in terms of user count, data volume, and collaboration needs without requiring major changes in the system. As organizations grow, I can simply scale by adding more users to my storage through licensing. It also supports large document libraries and multiple team sites, making it suitable for both small teams and large enterprises. Based on my experience, scalability has not been a concern as SharePoint adapts well as requirements increase.

Customer support for SharePoint is quite good and reliable, particularly because it is backed by Microsoft, so its responsiveness and helpfulness are very good in my experience.

Before using SharePoint, I primarily relied on mixed tools including Google Drive and local shared network drives for document storage and collaboration. While those solutions worked at a basic level, I faced challenges including lack of structured organization, limited version control, and associated access management. These often led to duplicate files and confusion over the latest document versions. I switched to SharePoint for its centralized document management, better version control, and stronger permissions handling. Additionally, its integrations with tools including Microsoft Teams made collaborations more seamless within the organization. Overall, the move helped me bring more structure, security, and efficiency into my document management process.

My experience with SharePoint pricing and licensing has been generally positive, specifically since it comes bundled with Microsoft 365. From a cost perspective, it has a subscription-based model, which makes it predictable and easier to manage compared to larger upfront investments. Since organizations typically use other Microsoft tools as well as SharePoint, it becomes a part of a broader package which adds good overall value. In terms of setup cost, using SharePoint Online reduces the need for infrastructure and maintenance, making the initial setup effort relatively lower compared to on-premises deployment.

I have definitely seen a positive ROI from using SharePoint, specifically through improvements in efficiency and reduced operational overhead. Time spent searching for documents has reduced significantly, and I saw a noticeable drop in duplicate or outdated documents, speeding up the search system by more than thirty to forty percent. Additionally, since SharePoint comes as a part of Microsoft 365, I avoided infrastructure and maintenance costs associated with on-premises systems, which also contributes to ROI.

Before choosing SharePoint, I evaluated a few alternatives including Google Drive, Dropbox, and Confluence. Google Drive and Dropbox were good for basic file storage and sharing, but they lacked the level of structured document management, advanced permissions, and workflow capabilities which I was looking for. Confluence was strong for document and knowledge sharing, but it was more suited for a Wikipedia-style content rather than full-fledged document management with strict access control. Ultimately, I chose SharePoint because it offers a more comprehensive solution combining document management, collaboration, security, and seamless integrations with the Microsoft ecosystem.

Before choosing SharePoint, I evaluated a few alternatives including Google Drive, Dropbox, and Confluence. Google Drive and Dropbox were good for basic file storage and sharing, but they lacked the level of structured document management, advanced permissions, and workflow capabilities which I was looking for. Confluence was strong for document and knowledge sharing, but it was more suited for a Wikipedia-style content rather than full-fledged document management with strict access control. Ultimately, I chose SharePoint because it offers a more comprehensive solution combining document management, collaboration, security, and seamless integrations with the Microsoft ecosystem.

I use Microsoft Azure as a cloud provider since the SharePoint deployment is a part of Microsoft 365.

My advice would be to first clearly understand your organization's needs, whether it is primarily document management, collaborations, or workflow automations, because SharePoint is quite flexible and works best when configured with a clear purpose. Secondly, invest time in proper structure and governance from the beginning. Setting up a well-organized document library, naming conventions, and permissions models early can prevent a lot of confusion later. Define your use case clearly, then set up proper structures and permissions early, leverage integrations including Microsoft Teams, and ensure user training to get the most out of SharePoint.

An additional thought I would share is that SharePoint is a very capable and reliable platform for organizations looking to improve their collaborations and document management. Its strength lies in how well it integrates with the broader Microsoft ecosystem, specifically tools including Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365. While there are some areas for improvement, particularly around usability and setup complexity, the overall value it provides in terms of productivity, structure, and scalability is significant. With the right implementations and governance, it can be a very powerful tool for teams of all sizes. I would rate my overall experience with SharePoint as an eight out of ten.

We use SharePoint as our cloud storage for files, folders, and everything else. We have different teams, including the evidence and impact team which I work with, the alumni team, and other teams that each have their own different sites on SharePoint which are user access restricted. If you are not a member of a team, you cannot have access to the site. Once you are a member of the team, all files and folders stored on the cloud for that site are accessible to you. We use it to store files and it makes sharing easier because it is already hosted on the cloud storage. Whether you are sharing via emails, Microsoft Teams, or any other medium, sharing files is easier because they are already hosted on the cloud.

Once you are the administrator, the person with admin access is able to set who has access to which site and what they have access to. Based on the admin access, it is very easy to set it up. Based on the work email, you can easily add anybody to the site or remove anybody from the site if the person exits the team or exits the foundation entirely.

The use of the sites makes it easier to navigate things. Each team has their own sites, and even within the site, it is possible you do not have access to a full site because you are not a member of the team. However, somebody within that team can grant you access to a particular file or a particular folder. Because you have been granted access through your work email, you can view that file or folder, but other files and folders within the site are not accessible to you because you are not a member of the team. This access control is excellent. Instead of having to attach raw files for every email or whenever you are sending documents, you simply get the link to SharePoint and include it in your email. Once the person is within the organization, depending on how you set the link to share the file, this approach works seamlessly.

It has saved a lot of time and errors in file sharing because on SharePoint you can easily see the last modified time of the file, which tells you that this is the current file. Another good thing is that files are hosted on the cloud, so we can work collaboratively. Up to maybe three or four people can work on the same document at the same time and the live updates upload every second. It is not a case of one person finishing their work before they send it to the other person. There can be collaboration instantly at the same place on the same document and the updates are there in real time.

Given that SharePoint saves version history, you can easily revert to a previous document. If you are not comfortable with the new changes made to the document, you can easily revert. This feature boosts efficiency and ensures that work time is saved and that work is not lost. There is also the recycle bin on SharePoint where you can literally recover a document if it got deleted by mistake, and your file is back on SharePoint.

Another useful feature is that you can set time zones. Based on the time your organization is operating in, you can set the time zone on SharePoint to reflect the time so that it actually carries your local time. For every file, you can see the last person who modified the file or the folder and the time of modification, which is also helpful.

Retrieving folders from SharePoint is very easy. The same way you can do advanced search on Google or through a Google search engine, you can also do advanced searching on SharePoint. You can search based on metadata in title or in text. You can set search based on the file extension type. You can search by last modified time, last save time, and you can also search based on contents of the file. These different search options make it so that file retrieval from SharePoint is very easy.

For me SharePoint is amazing. I have not thought about any feature that could be better because downloads and renaming are all easy. However, there is a feature that could be better. When you are using the search engine or when you are on your Microsoft File Explorer, which is Windows File Explorer, you can use the alternate left arrow to move back when you are browsing, and you can use it to go back to the previous page where you are. I have not seen any shortcut on SharePoint that helps you navigate backwards. You literally have to go to the browser and click on the browser left back button to go back to the list of files in the cascade of folders. If SharePoint could have a shortcut that helps you go back to the previous file or go back to the previous folder that you are on, that would be great.

I started using SharePoint when I joined the foundation over a year ago. I joined on June 16th and it is now June 15th, so tomorrow makes it one year since I started using Microsoft SharePoint.

SharePoint is 100% stable. Each time we have SharePoint, an issue with SharePoint is never an issue. I have never once experienced a downtime on SharePoint whereby we come and say files are not accessible because the SharePoint server is down. This has never happened despite the fact that we keep growing and adding more files. We keep having more files, text, images, and different types of formats stored, with additional ones added by the day, yet we have never had a downtime.

Scalability for new teams has been handled very well and seamlessly. We have had new teams developed within our organization, and SharePoint has scaled to accommodate them without any issues. I rate it a 100 without misgivings.

We have never had a negative experience with SharePoint. I will be 100% honest with you. We have never had a negative experience with SharePoint whereby we had to lay a complaint to their customer support. All we do with their customer support is when we want to renew our license. Renewing license access for SharePoint is very easy. We do it as an annual payment.

For my organization, we have always used SharePoint. On a personal basis, I have used Google Drive before. Where I was working previously, we used Google Drive. It was not seamless because we did not have an organizational drive system; it was individualized. Because everybody had to upload files to their individual drives, it brought issues of version control and was also slow. It made work very slow because we had to upload to your own personal drive first before sharing with the next person or colleague. SharePoint is better because it gives enterprise level access to files.

I joined in June last year and I have been using SharePoint for one year now. I cannot tell if there were other options that were evaluated before we decided to go for Microsoft SharePoint. However, I can tell you one thing: my organization uses Microsoft for all the way. This must be a valuable point for why we went for Microsoft SharePoint instead of maybe Amazon AWS or any other cloud storage system.

For the licensing, licensing is easy because as an organization, we have an organizational license. Once you join the organization and they sign you up and give you a work email based on the domain of the organization, you automatically get your license to SharePoint. For the pricing and licensing, we do our annual payment for SharePoint access as an enterprise. Once anybody has the work email under the enterprise, you get your access. Pricing is fair and licensing is easy to achieve.

Huge amount of time is saved. Especially from my own personal experience, I can tell you that SharePoint usage saves me an average of one and a half hours per day. Having to use SharePoint instead of having to use the normal localized file system or decentralized file system, it saves me an approximate of one and a half work hours per day.

The first advice is that anybody looking to adopt Microsoft SharePoint should be aware that SharePoint is owned by Microsoft. It works better with Microsoft applications and with a Microsoft environment. This is the one and only thing I need anybody who is willing to adopt SharePoint to be aware of. I rate this review a 9 out of 10.

I have been using SharePoint for the past five to six years. Before working at IDC, I used to work at Protiviti where I also used SharePoint for our knowledge management platform and knowledge management tool.

From my perspective, since I am a data professional and we have to keep a record of all the data as per our client's demand, SharePoint provides us a repository where we can keep all our data intact and updated. We have the convenience of sharing all the information whether within our organization or outside our organization with utmost security.

SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data.

The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner.

The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable.

Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.

While working with SharePoint, I observed that if the number of files is too much, the upload time, management time, and search time consume a lot of time during the initial phase. Once it has been set up, then it is acceptable. However, the initial phase timing is quite long, so that could be reduced.

I have been familiar with SharePoint for the past five to six years.

The pricing is completely fine. As per my understanding, the pricing is okay.

The installation is also very simple. The instructions are quite clear and it is compatible with most systems. The installation process is very good.

Positive

The only solution which I have worked with that is similar to SharePoint is a particular tool that we use internally at IDC. I have not used any other vendor because wherever I have heard from my friends, SharePoint is the most precise and most optimum tool for the things that we do.

The installation is very simple. The instructions are quite clear and it is compatible with most systems. The installation process is very good.

IDC directly subscribed for SharePoint from the vendor. We did not purchase it from the marketplace.

I work at International Data Corporation and we have our own internal tools to work upon. The internal tools are completely in-house and developed by the IDC team only. Since our data is quite confidential, we have to keep to ourselves only. I am not currently using any of the tools mentioned as a consumer. We do not use products like Google Meet. Generally, we use Microsoft Teams and Zoom calls. One of my team members is using CRM software, but I am not confirmed about it because we are not in direct use of that. Regarding metrics, this is related to the HR department, so I cannot be much help for this. However, we do use some matrices. My overall rating for SharePoint is a nine.

SharePoint is a repository that I use primarily for collaboration and sharing resources and assets. It's a good way to collaborate, and one benefit of SharePoint is the pages you can create on it, which can be made available internally or externally based on hosting. That helps create a secure way to communicate as well as store resources for consumption.

I feel the creation of pages is the best feature of SharePoint because that helps post and store information. It is particularly useful when I'm trying to create an asset related to a webpage, email automation, or something else that is HTML, CSS, or JavaScript based. I can host these on SharePoint and call that location wherever I've hosted the image or file, helping to securely host enterprise content that is encrypted and protected from being deprecated or hacked into.

SharePoint is a repository that I use primarily for collaboration and sharing resources and assets. It's a good way to collaborate, and one benefit of SharePoint is the pages you can create on it, which can be made available internally or externally based on hosting. That helps create a secure way to communicate as well as store resources for consumption.

I feel the creation of pages is the best feature of SharePoint because that helps post and store information. It is particularly useful when I'm trying to create an asset related to a webpage, email automation, or something else that is HTML, CSS, or JavaScript based. I can host these on SharePoint and call that location wherever I've hosted the image or file, helping to securely host enterprise content that is encrypted and protected from being deprecated or hacked into.

It is a little difficult to name the areas for improvements in SharePoint because I don't use it all that much. I know I can host pages on it and feel that the CMS platform, which helps create those pages, can be improved. The interface is not all that great, but other than that, there's not much to say because it's a pretty simple tool and I don't have high expectations for it to improve.

The main issue bothering me today is the Content Management System, which is basically the interface through which I can create the landing page. The design and the way to incorporate things could be better because there are better content management platforms available right now. Even newer platforms like WordPress are better, so I think SharePoint can improve on that.

I have been using SharePoint for approximately two years.

SharePoint is stable and I see it very similar to OneDrive. I give it a solid nine as it is very stable as a product.

The scalability of SharePoint is excellent, very similar to my rating for OneDrive. You can apply the same rating of OneDrive to SharePoint in terms of enterprise readiness and usability; they are very similar products. I give SharePoint a nine out of ten rating for scalability.

I would give a seven for support in terms of SharePoint because I haven't used support recently and cannot comment further on it, but Microsoft support has generally been good, so seven is a decent number.

I don't deal with the deployment of SharePoint, so I don't have comments on that. I use the existing deployed version.

Google Pages is a similar product that I feel is not as evolved as SharePoint. SharePoint is much better.

SharePoint is better than Google Pages due to the maturity of the content I can create, the way I can store assets, and the way I can consume them. Everything is more mature with SharePoint as it is more enterprise-ready. My experience with Google Pages was not great for communication, and I have not used it in the last year, but before that, it didn't function well.

Integration capability mainly depends on what you are trying to integrate.

Integration with Microsoft products is pretty good, but with third-party tools, I didn't know that SharePoint could do that; I've never used it in that way, so I have no idea about it.

SharePoint will be on a private cloud if I'm not wrong. My overall review rating for SharePoint is eight out of ten.

I create a data warehouse and establish a link between different applications. For data exchange, the vendor is Oracle.

There is no real improvement; we are slightly different, but we can accomplish the same tasks in both environments. I think Google was simpler, and perhaps that is because we worked for a long time with Google, so we are more accustomed to it.

The search functionality is adequate. Customization has many possibilities, but I do not really customize our document management system, and that is not my responsibility. SharePoint interface is adequate and also a little bit faster. Sometimes I have to refresh pages more than with Google, but it does not charge; the page has a long delay, and I prefer to refresh the browser, and sometimes it works that way.

It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution. Sometimes I have to refresh pages more than with Google, but it does not charge; the page has a long delay, and I prefer to refresh the browser, and sometimes it works that way.

From my point of view, it was too early to assess this because we used it for only one month, but before we were on Google Drive, and it was also similar.

I have not experienced any stability issues yet.

I have not experienced any scalability issues yet.

I do not have knowledge of this aspect as I do not work on this project.

Neutral

From my point of view, it was too early to assess this because we used it for only one month, but before we were on Google Drive, and it was also similar.

It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution. I think Google was simpler, and perhaps that is because we worked for a long time with Google, so we are more accustomed to it.

I do not have knowledge of this; the solution is too new, so I cannot assess it.

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

I do not have knowledge of this as I do not work on this project.

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

We are just testing this solution, not using it extensively. For Snowflake data, we are conducting some tests to determine whether we will work with this solution.

For Oracle, the product is adequate and it is not a different name. I do not have knowledge of this one. I do not work with the document management aspect in SharePoint. For document sharing, I cannot comment. I am not the administrator, so I do not have this knowledge. I do not pay attention to that, so it is not my concern. I cannot comment. I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project. I have never worked with that aspect. The overall review rating for this product is 8.

I was using Microsoft tools before six months. Since I worked in strategic, I worked with SharePoint but not with Visual Studio or similar tools. SharePoint is used to share information and to work in teams; that's the purpose of the work with them.

It's very easy to integrate with other software from Microsoft; it works fine with Excel, Word, email, and similar tools, which I find valuable.

We've got good experience, so it's easy for us to set up SharePoint.

Not with SharePoint specifically, but overall with the software or tools from Microsoft, I think there are areas that need improvement. It's very difficult to understand the objective. There are so many software options that we don't know which is the best software to use for our needs.

I am familiar with some of the other products, other than 365, but as mentioned before, it's very difficult to understand the perfect tool for our needs. Perhaps Microsoft needs to teach customers the objective of each tool, which would make it more efficient for us.

I have five to six years of experience overall with SharePoint.

So far, we don't have a third party; it was all within our company that deployed it.

I would rate Microsoft support a six out of 10, which I feel is a fair rating.

When I connect with a person from Microsoft, it's easy to get information, but it's very difficult to reach people; they seem to be very busy. It's also difficult sometimes to get the right information because we speak at first to a generalist and they have to go to a specialist. So, it takes some time to get the right answer.

Neutral

We didn't use another product before switching to SharePoint, and it's very easy for us since we have been using Microsoft tools for many years.

There were 20 people on the IT team that deployed and set up SharePoint.

They work to get SharePoint on the right level, but also on intranet and related to the Office tools as well.

I don't know the other products; if you are within the Microsoft environment, I would recommend SharePoint to other people and businesses.

I confirm that I had experience with SharePoint. I prefer not to use my company name and keep that anonymous.

The email yves.de-boryu@videotron.ca is still valid.

We had the first level to use Copilot, which SharePoint assisted for managing AI-driven data analysis.

With some people, it's not wide open to everybody, but it's interesting; some people use it extensively because they need to draft letters or documents and they use the first step Copilot.

I rate SharePoint 8 out of 10.

Positive

Neutral

Positive

We primarily use SharePoint for content management and as a repository for documents. It serves as a document management and storage solution for both department-related and company-related information. 

SharePoint also offers collaboration features, such as online editing of documents, allowing us to co-edit documents in real-time.

SharePoint has integrated well with our internal platforms, such as Outlook, Microsoft Teams, and Microsoft Office 365. It provides not only a document storage solution but also a collaborative solution. 

It has inbuilt workflows, security permissions, versioning, and supports a lot of apps for surveys and no-code applications. It's beneficial for internal communication and coordination.

SharePoint's collaborative features are valuable as they enable productivity by allowing multiple users to edit documents simultaneously. 

It integrates with internal platforms like Microsoft Teams and Office 365, enhances productivity, and provides security and versioning capabilities.

The search functionality could be improved, especially when dealing with 'lift' lists, where there are performance issues. 

The aesthetics of certain fields are not up to the mark compared to other products.

I have had experience working with SharePoint for more than five years.

The stability of SharePoint is high; it is quite stable and resilient.

SharePoint is scalable. It uses SQL Server for storing content and configurations, making it easy to scale from a load-balancing and infrastructure perspective.

Microsoft support could be better, especially for enterprise troubleshooting. They require a lot of logs and often rely on online support, which does not meet customer expectations.

Neutral

Before SharePoint, we used Lotus Notes and others. Due to Microsoft's aggressive pricing, SharePoint became the preferred choice.

The initial setup for SharePoint Online is easy, while SharePoint On Premise is complex and requires more resources.

Managing SharePoint requires skilled administrators and developers, especially for large enterprise-grade farms.

I am not involved in the licensing, but Microsoft offers bundled pricing for Office, SharePoint, and Exchange, making it cost-effective.

There are other cloud-based solutions like Confluence and Jira, which can achieve similar results as SharePoint.

With the availability of fantastic products on the cloud, it is advisable to move towards cloud-based solutions rather than setting up complex on-premises structures. However, enterprises that use Microsoft Office often find value in using SharePoint.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.