Kiteworks vs SharePoint comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kiteworks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Kiteworks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Kiteworks holds a 1.4% mindshare in ECM, compared to Microsoft’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

6,564 Views
1,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 166 SharePoint reviews

24,011 Views
12,966 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SharePoint and Kiteworks compete in the enterprise communication and collaboration category, with SharePoint holding an edge in integration with Microsoft tools and Kiteworks in security features.

Features: SharePoint allows integration with Microsoft Office, robust document management, and co-authoring capabilities. Kiteworks, on the other hand, provides secure file sharing, user-managed information capabilities, and encryption for data security.

Room for Improvement: SharePoint could improve real-time co-authoring, enhance search, and simplify file synchronization and permissions. Kiteworks can benefit from better stability, faster support response times, and a more streamlined offboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePoint offers cloud and on-premises solutions, though Microsoft’s support can be expensive and often relies on partners for comprehensive service. Kiteworks provides public and private cloud options with a straightforward user interface, but support responsiveness varies.

Pricing and ROI: SharePoint's pricing is often bundled with Office 365 subscriptions and can be complex, yet offers significant ROI through centralized storage and streamlined processes. Kiteworks is perceived to have high pricing but is justified by its strong security features, providing a balanced cost against security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (27th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (7th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

166

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (3rd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 12.1%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	12.1%
Kiteworks	1.4%
Other	86.5%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

AnjneyBhardwaj

Senior Market Research Analyst at IDC Corporate

Collaboration has improved through simplified document access and controlled sharing

SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data. The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner. The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable. Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"Kiteworks is easy to manage and maintain with a user-friendly interface and I recommend it to anyone that requires a file-sharing system that supports SFTP."

"The most useful feature of this solution is to share files with external parties and we can use this functionality to share files internally too."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"The solution can be used remotely, including from mobiles, and it's easy to upload and share files."

"As a file-sharing application, it's an absolute 10 out of 10."

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

More Kiteworks pros

"This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."

"The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically."

"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it."

"Document flows, storage, and numbering take off the actions for checking and assigning the numbering and running around with approvals and pre-approvals."

"I find that SharePoint when used for the right purpose, lends itself to be a fantastic collaboration and workflow service."

"It has improved our productivity to a great extent with its great collaboration features."

"It has improved our organization by speeding up document sharing."

"We can arrange all our documents on one platform and see the document's changes and edits."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"We have experienced some issues with stability due to bugs."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"The system is extremely stable, but because it is a "COTS" system access is restricted and you must use the solution's support to make even simple changes, which increases the downtime."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

More Kiteworks cons

"The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools."

"Microsoft seems to always be making changes."

"The editing tools are still not up to par with all the existing hi-tech and GUI editing tools."

"The support is the worst. It is bad when Microsoft support does not even know what to do and you have to tell them. Also, they take too long to solve a problem."

"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."

"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products."

"The limitations and boundaries must be extended."

"The initial setup was somewhat complex."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The pricing works for us."

"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."

"The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

"The data classification and search elements are cheap."

"It is very expensive."

"The platform has medium pricing."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	84

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

I don't know how SharePoint can be improved because it works effectively, so I can't think of any improvement. It exists in the background, similar to Windows, where you don't think about it, but i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

I have been using SharePoint for three years since I began employment at Wartsila. My main use case for SharePoint is storing documents, meeting recordings, and visiting websites created by my coll...

See all answers

Comparisons

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

Seclore Email Encryption vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 3% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 16% of the time

Atlassian Confluence vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

Drupal vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

October 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

October 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Accellion

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Kiteworks

SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.

SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.

What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?

Document Management: Organize and manage documents efficiently.
Collaboration Tools: Enhance team collaboration and communication.
Microsoft Office Integration: Seamlessly work with Office applications.
Search Capabilities: Robust search and metadata tagging for easy retrieval.
Access Control: Protect and manage sensitive information access.
Power Platform Integration: Quick data handling and automation for improved productivity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for When Evaluating SharePoint?

Improved Team Efficiency: Enhance coordination and document sharing.
Centralized Storage: Efficient content management in a centralized repository.
Seamless Workflow Automation: Automate processes to boost productivity.
Integration Capability: Enhance functionality with external services and applications.
Customization Options: Tailor workflows and user experience to business needs.

In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

November 2026

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.