Kiteworks vs SharePoint comparison

Kiteworks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Kiteworks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Kiteworks holds a 1.4% mindshare in ECM, compared to Microsoft’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

5,504 Views
936 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 166 SharePoint reviews

19,592 Views
11,363 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SharePoint and Kiteworks compete in the enterprise communication and collaboration category, with SharePoint holding an edge in integration with Microsoft tools and Kiteworks in security features.

Features: SharePoint allows integration with Microsoft Office, robust document management, and co-authoring capabilities. Kiteworks, on the other hand, provides secure file sharing, user-managed information capabilities, and encryption for data security.

Room for Improvement: SharePoint could improve real-time co-authoring, enhance search, and simplify file synchronization and permissions. Kiteworks can benefit from better stability, faster support response times, and a more streamlined offboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePoint offers cloud and on-premises solutions, though Microsoft’s support can be expensive and often relies on partners for comprehensive service. Kiteworks provides public and private cloud options with a straightforward user interface, but support responsiveness varies.

Pricing and ROI: SharePoint's pricing is often bundled with Office 365 subscriptions and can be complex, yet offers significant ROI through centralized storage and streamlined processes. Kiteworks is perceived to have high pricing but is justified by its strong security features, providing a balanced cost against security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (26th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (8th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

166

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 12.0%, down from 15.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	12.0%
Kiteworks	1.4%
Other	86.6%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Ravi Raushan Kumar

Software Engineer at ValueMomentum

Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured

SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As a file-sharing application, it's an absolute 10 out of 10."

"It’s a great product that you should seriously consider and take the first step by training."

"We can see when people are sending things. We can definitely see who is sending to whom. From the administrative logs, we can see who is sending to an outside entity, and those logs are retained for quite a while."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"Scalability is impressive."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

More Kiteworks pros

"It's very stable; I call it a multifunctional document system because you can do a lot of things with it, and it's just incredible how much we have been able to automate a few steps that people had to do thanks to the integration with other Office products."

"SharePoint provides out-of-the-box data indexing and caching."

"The initial setup of SharePoint is very straightforward."

"Our staff found it simpler, as they did not have to work within a classification system."

"We have taken advantage of the list features extensively and the ability to clone subsites, and the creation of lists and the ability to tie lists together has made my job and other different department’s jobs easier."

"This has allowed our organization to start moving away from manual and non-standard practices, to more repeatable procedures."

"My advice is to not hesitate; just plunge in and implement SharePoint."

"Document flows, storage, and numbering take off the actions for checking and assigning the numbering and running around with approvals and pre-approvals."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"File location could be improved."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"There is one particular thing that is a nuisance."

More Kiteworks cons

"Microsoft support could be better, especially for enterprise troubleshooting. They require a lot of logs and often rely on online support, which does not meet customer expectations."

"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."

"The solution should be made more user-friendly for technical and business people."

"More hints and make it more user-customizable."

"The management of the product/back-end is complex."

"Setup was complex. We needed to design governance and implementation architecture before deployment."

"The technical support process should be more streamlined as it usually involves contacting vendors and arranging calls for resolution."

"Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The data classification and search elements are cheap."

"The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."

"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."

"It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."

"The pricing is competitive."

"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."

"It comes bundled with the Microsoft 365 pricing plans."

"It is very expensive."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	83

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

For me SharePoint is amazing. I have not thought about any feature that could be better because downloads and renaming are all easy. However, there is a feature that could be better. When you are u...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

We use SharePoint as our cloud storage for files, folders, and everything else. We have different teams, including the evidence and impact team which I work with, the alumni team, and other teams t...

See all answers

Comparisons

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Seclore Email Encryption vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

Jive vs SharePoint

Compared 2% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

July 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

July 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Accellion

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Kiteworks

SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.

SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.

What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?

Document Management: Organize and manage documents efficiently.
Collaboration Tools: Enhance team collaboration and communication.
Microsoft Office Integration: Seamlessly work with Office applications.
Search Capabilities: Robust search and metadata tagging for easy retrieval.
Access Control: Protect and manage sensitive information access.
Power Platform Integration: Quick data handling and automation for improved productivity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for When Evaluating SharePoint?

Improved Team Efficiency: Enhance coordination and document sharing.
Centralized Storage: Efficient content management in a centralized repository.
Seamless Workflow Automation: Automate processes to boost productivity.
Integration Capability: Enhance functionality with external services and applications.
Customization Options: Tailor workflows and user experience to business needs.

In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

August 2026

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.