Kiteworks vs SharePoint comparison

Kiteworks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Kiteworks is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Kiteworks holds a 1.4% mindshare in ECM, compared to Microsoft’s 11.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

4,869 Views
828 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 167 SharePoint reviews

16,578 Views
9,284 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SharePoint and Kiteworks compete in the enterprise communication and collaboration category, with SharePoint holding an edge in integration with Microsoft tools and Kiteworks in security features.

Features: SharePoint allows integration with Microsoft Office, robust document management, and co-authoring capabilities. Kiteworks, on the other hand, provides secure file sharing, user-managed information capabilities, and encryption for data security.

Room for Improvement: SharePoint could improve real-time co-authoring, enhance search, and simplify file synchronization and permissions. Kiteworks can benefit from better stability, faster support response times, and a more streamlined offboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePoint offers cloud and on-premises solutions, though Microsoft’s support can be expensive and often relies on partners for comprehensive service. Kiteworks provides public and private cloud options with a straightforward user interface, but support responsiveness varies.

Pricing and ROI: SharePoint's pricing is often bundled with Office 365 subscriptions and can be complex, yet offers significant ROI through centralized storage and streamlined processes. Kiteworks is perceived to have high pricing but is justified by its strong security features, providing a balanced cost against security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (26th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (8th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

167

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 11.7%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	11.7%
Kiteworks	1.4%
Other	86.9%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Ravi Raushan Kumar

Software Engineer at ValueMomentum

Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured

SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"It’s a great product that you should seriously consider and take the first step by training."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"The solution can be used remotely, including from mobiles, and it's easy to upload and share files."

"We can see when people are sending things. We can definitely see who is sending to whom. From the administrative logs, we can see who is sending to an outside entity, and those logs are retained for quite a while."

More Kiteworks pros

"The solution is cost-effective and has a perpetual license per environment."

"The most valuable feature of SharePoint is its user interface, which is very easy to use."

"The product itself is very robust and capable, but the success of the tool is largely dependent upon the team that deploys and maintains the product, as well as resources available to it."

"Sharing information is very easy in SharePoint. We use multiple types of documents, like online Excel tools and online content editing, especially for group editing. This allows us to collaborate, even in distributed teams. Despite being geographically spread out, everyone can access the same files online, edit them, and see changes. We also use SharePoint to track all these changes, making our teamwork more collaborative overall. The tool fastens information sharing and collaboration."

"The search feature is valuable."

"SharePoint is a Rapid Application Development platform where a simple library, indexed, can be deployed in minutes."

"The most valuable features are its ease of integration and customization."

"Information is much more readily available."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"The system is extremely stable, but because it is a "COTS" system access is restricted and you must use the solution's support to make even simple changes, which increases the downtime."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"File location could be improved."

More Kiteworks cons

"Ultimately SharePoint offers less than what you need for more than what you bargained."

"For sure, it should offer customisation of data grids, which is not possible, as it seems to use some proprietary OCX control."

"The initial setup was very complex."

"Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents."

"It is not very intuitive to most users."

"It has its limitations. We are unable to use this tool to "archive" data and run queries to generate hindsight information."

"The solution's support services and GenAI could be improved and made faster and more knowledgeable."

"Using SharePoint is difficult."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The pricing works for us."

"Licensing can be by server or by seat."

"It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."

"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."

"The pricing is competitive."

"We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."

"The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	83

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

It is a little difficult to name the areas for improvements in SharePoint because I don't use it all that much. I know I can host pages on it and feel that the CMS platform, which helps create thos...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

SharePoint is a repository that I use primarily for collaboration and sharing resources and assets. It's a good way to collaborate, and one benefit of SharePoint is the pages you can create on it, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Office 365 vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

June 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

May 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Accellion

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Kiteworks

SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.

SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.

What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?

Document Management: Organize and manage documents efficiently.
Collaboration Tools: Enhance team collaboration and communication.
Microsoft Office Integration: Seamlessly work with Office applications.
Search Capabilities: Robust search and metadata tagging for easy retrieval.
Access Control: Protect and manage sensitive information access.
Power Platform Integration: Quick data handling and automation for improved productivity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for When Evaluating SharePoint?

Improved Team Efficiency: Enhance coordination and document sharing.
Centralized Storage: Efficient content management in a centralized repository.
Seamless Workflow Automation: Automate processes to boost productivity.
Integration Capability: Enhance functionality with external services and applications.
Customization Options: Tailor workflows and user experience to business needs.

In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

June 2026

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.