Kiteworks vs SharePoint comparison

Kiteworks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Kiteworks is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Kiteworks holds a 1.0% mindshare in ECM, compared to Microsoft’s 13.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,802 Views
308 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 164 SharePoint reviews

9,391 Views
4,789 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SharePoint and Kiteworks compete in the enterprise communication and collaboration category, with SharePoint holding an edge in integration with Microsoft tools and Kiteworks in security features.

Features: SharePoint allows integration with Microsoft Office, robust document management, and co-authoring capabilities. Kiteworks, on the other hand, provides secure file sharing, user-managed information capabilities, and encryption for data security.

Room for Improvement: SharePoint could improve real-time co-authoring, enhance search, and simplify file synchronization and permissions. Kiteworks can benefit from better stability, faster support response times, and a more streamlined offboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePoint offers cloud and on-premises solutions, though Microsoft’s support can be expensive and often relies on partners for comprehensive service. Kiteworks provides public and private cloud options with a straightforward user interface, but support responsiveness varies.

Pricing and ROI: SharePoint's pricing is often bundled with Office 365 subscriptions and can be complex, yet offers significant ROI through centralized storage and streamlined processes. Kiteworks is perceived to have high pricing but is justified by its strong security features, providing a balanced cost against security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (30th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (12th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (10th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

164

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 13.4%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SharePoint	13.4%
Kiteworks	1.0%
Other	85.6%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

AnjneyBhardwaj

Senior Market Research Analyst at IDC Corporate

Collaboration has improved through simplified document access and controlled sharing

SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data. The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner. The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable. Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

"Scalability is impressive."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

More Kiteworks pros

"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."

"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."

"OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."

"We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform."

"What I like about SharePoint is that they keep up with a lot of updates, and they bring out new features. I also like that the system is integrated with the Microsoft 365 suite of apps."

"The most valuable features of SharePoint include the ability to co-edit documents in the Office suite, particularly Excel and Word."

"It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place."

"The most valuable aspect of SharePoint is its integration with Teams. T"

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

More Kiteworks cons

"There are some limitations on storage."

"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."

"I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools."

"Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents."

"We'd like to be able to upload from MS Excel to deploy tasks and use drop-down lists to collect further information."

"While working with SharePoint, I observed that if the number of files is too much, the upload time, management time, and search time consume a lot of time during the initial phase."

"The introduction of AI and automation with Copilot could be a beneficial improvement."

"There's a challenge with desktop applications synchronizing with online documents in real-time. If someone is working on a document in the desktop version of Excel, for example, and someone else is editing the same document online, the changes won't sync immediately. That's the only real challenge we've encountered."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The pricing is competitive."

"The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."

"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."

"It comes bundled with the Microsoft 365 pricing plans."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."

"The pricing is competitive."

"They are about an eight in comparison to other similar products."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	81

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SharePoint?

The search feature is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution. Sometimes I have to refresh pages more than with Google, but it does not charge; the page ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 21% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 9% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

Box vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

DocuSign vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

December 2025

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

December 2025

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Accellion

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

December 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.