Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Oracle WebCenter vs SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
2,205 views|1,801 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
20,637 views|17,138 comparisons
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."

More Oracle WebCenter Pros →

"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution.""The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services.""For SharePoint, I believe the most valuable feature is the customization and allowing you to share and edit files and documents. Being able to share externally and the precise administration of the files in terms of giving permissions and controlling who has access to what is a very good feature.""Ability to store files of any type.""What I like about SharePoint is that they keep up with a lot of updates, and they bring out new features. I also like that the system is integrated with the Microsoft 365 suite of apps."

More SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."

More Oracle WebCenter Cons →

"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility.""Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users.""SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve.""Document management and the ability to easily integrate single sign-on (SSO) are areas for improvement in SharePoint.""The solution lacks collaboration features."

More SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."
  • "Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."
  • "The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    635,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Integration within the solution is very good.
    Top Answer:We use the tool for free in our country; the licensing policy is not accessible in Iran.
    Top Answer:The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product. It would be helpful if Oracle could create… more »
    Top Answer:Hi. I would suggest Ezofis which has a lot of customization and ease of use features compared to Alfresco. Even the pricing is better compared to ECM products in the market.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple… more »
    Top Answer:The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good. There can be additional costs depending on the features that we are going… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,205
    Comparisons
    1,801
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    816
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    20,637
    Comparisons
    17,138
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    790
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebCenter, FatWire
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Offer
    Learn more about Oracle WebCenter
    Learn more about SharePoint
    Sample Customers
    Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Pharma/Biotech Company25%
    Healthcare Company13%
    Marketing Services Firm13%
    Transportation Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    University9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%

    Oracle WebCenter is ranked 8th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 8 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while SharePoint is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has the ability to move workloads in between sub-servers but the backups should be faster ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Offers great OCR capabilities, metadata storage and proficient archiving ". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with WebLogic Suite, Adobe Experience Manager, WordPress, Oracle Content Management and IBM FileNet, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Box, WordPress, Dropbox and Drupal.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors, best Web Content Management vendors, and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.