Airtable Reviews

Name: Airtable
Brand: Airtable
Rating: 4.4 (14 reviews)

4.4 out of 5

14 reviews
100% willing to recommend

What is Airtable?

Airtable was founded on the belief that software shouldn't dictate how you work – you should dictate how it works. Our mission is to democratize software creation by enabling anyone to build the software tools that meet their needs. Creators and creatives around the world use Airtable to do everything from cattle tracking to filmmaking, and they have great things to say.

Get the Airtable Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Airtable, Microsoft Project, Adobe Workfront and more!

Airtable is the #1 ranked solution in top Product Management Software solutions and #14 ranked solution in top Project Management Software. PeerSpot users give Airtable an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Airtable is most commonly compared to Microsoft Project: Airtable vs Microsoft Project. Airtable is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 11% of all views.

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Featured Airtable reviews

Ashwini Ramanisankar

Airtable Administrator at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

The interfaces provided by the company have certainly undergone significant improvements since their earlier versions. The growth and progress have been remarkable. I have personally shared numerous feedback points and observed the prompt implementation of changes within a few months, which is highly commendable. However, I must admit that I have encountered several challenges with their interfaces. In terms of the interface, there are certain improvements I would suggest. For instance, a global search feature is currently absent, which would greatly enhance usability. Additionally, incorporating a search function within automation would be highly beneficial. The current limitation of fifty automation per base is insufficient for our needs and could be expanded. Moreover, there is a need for a longer native time delay in automation to allow for more flexible syncing. Currently, the syncing time is set at approximately three to five minutes, which could be increased for smoother operations.

Read full review

Sherifah Ojewale

Notion Specialist at Fancy Production

We use Airtable to manage and track weekly site visits and monitor progress and improvements over time The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements. Airtable has valuable features for automation. The product's AI feature needs improvement. There could be an…

Read full review

Kaitlin Messmer

President at PKAE Consulting LLC

Reporting, specifically anything involving exports, could be improved. The recent rollout of interfaces, and visual presentations of the underlying data, was a great step in the right direction to make reporting more executive-friendly. More work needs to be done to make it more user-friendly to get your data out of Airtable in simple and clean ways. It can be overwhelming for teams who may not be familiar with the backend and are faced with numerous formula fields or lookup fields to be able to summarize their data in a way that can be exported. Additionally, there is work to be done for users to be able to design exports of data groups for reporting purposes. The good news is that Airtable is actively working to improve exports. As I mentioned, I’m a big fan of Airtable Automations. That said, there is an opportunity to streamline duplicative automations by adding a trigger that covers both matches and updates. Currently, you need both a matches XYZ conditions trigger for an automation and an updated record trigger for an automation to capture when something is first created and then when it's updated. This means two separate automations to keep the same field/output updated. Airtable releasing a trigger that captured both the creation and future updates would be super handy and cut down the number of automations needed to maintain data accuracy for this example. Another feature I'd like to see is an easier way to self-link within tables. When you link records across tables, the link is automatically created within both records, but self-linking within a table requires manual linking and/or the creation of a complex automation to do it for you. It took several hours to come up with a suitable workaround to capture when a parent record changed in the child record’s linked field. In an ideal world, you would use two different tables, but then you hit the challenge of plotting those two tables on the same calendar, which has its own set of more technical workarounds.

Read full review

Airtable mindshare

Product category:

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Airtable in the Project Management Software category stands at 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

PeerResearch reports based on Airtable reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Project Management Software	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Comparison	Airtable vs Jira	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Comparison	Airtable vs Asana	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Comparison	Airtable vs monday.com	Jul 31, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Microsoft Project	4.0	6.7%	93%	82 interviews Add to research
Adobe Workfront	4.1	3.1%	88%	34 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Airtable excels with its intuitive interface, automation capabilities, and seamless database linking. Users find it user-friendly, enabling creation of relational databases without code. Its data sorting, record linking, and automation enhance productivity. Airtable allows for complex tasks like scripting and document storage, with features like auto-saving and multi-select fields offering versatility. It supports fast product shipping and quick data structuring, making it a valuable tool for diverse needs.

"Airtable has really benefited us in document storage."
"It was easy to get started."
"I appreciated the ability to configure a graphical interface for a database, which was quite novel at the time."

Room for Improvement

Airtable users encounter challenges with data syncing times and API limitations. Improved documentation and user-based permissions are needed. Enhancing the mobile interface and including a global search would improve usability. Users seek better reporting options and increased data storage limits. Concerns include high costs for additional users and insufficient automation capabilities. More comprehensive tutorials and documentation, particularly for scripting and automations, are desired to support new users and improve comprehension.

"The cost structure of Airtable presents a challenge. When you invite a user, you have to pay for that user."
"I believe that the company I worked for did not utilize it to its full potential."
"I haven't used it in a while, so I cannot really provide specific areas that need improvement."

ROI

Organizations reported a positive return on investment from Airtable, particularly due to automation capabilities. They highlighted how Airtable eliminates the need for manual data entry by automatically populating data and performing calculations. Some used it as an intake form and web page publisher, noting its significant potential. The ability to automate tasks contributes to ROI by reducing the need for additional personnel.

Pricing

Airtable's pricing structure is user-based, with a free version offering limited features. The Pro plan costs $20 per user/month and is favored by many. Enterprise plans require direct negotiation with sales. Pricing can escalate depending on usage depth, especially for large organizations needing premium features. Some find the product expensive, particularly when scaling. However, there is general consensus that the offering provides good value, particularly for those leveraging the free plan's functionality.

"The product's price is good."
"The product's price is good."
"The product would be expensive for customers with only one application or database."

Popular Use Cases

Entities utilize Airtable for diverse purposes such as project tracking, inventory management, and CRM. It supports operations in startups and manufacturing, aids content management, organizes communication workflows, and automates processes. Companies integrate Airtable with tools like Google Workspace and Pipedrive for seamless data exchange. Businesses use it for building dynamic databases, overseeing applicant tracking, and managing client databases, highlighting its role as a versatile tool for operational efficiency and automation across various industries.

Service and Support

Airtable customer service is mixed. Some users report quick and helpful responses with proactive communication, often rating it positively. However, others feel the timeliness could improve, rating it lower. Enterprise customers seem to receive better service, frequently giving high ratings. Many users appreciate email responses and additional resources like screen-sharing or video support. Although various users express satisfaction, some find responses could vary depending on their association with Airtable.

Deployment

Users found Airtable setup generally easy, especially with templates easing customization. For those familiar with similar tools, the process is enjoyable and quick. Some experienced a learning curve with more complex projects, requiring more time or expertise, especially for advanced automation. Deployment time varied based on complexity, from minutes for simple setups to weeks for large systems. The community and documentation are valuable resources, aiding users through Airtable configuration and deployment.

Scalability

Airtable is scalable for small to medium-sized ventures with data limitations suggested around certain thresholds. Users appreciate its capability for small-scale projects but note that expanding to larger datasets can present challenges. Many organizations with under 100 users report satisfaction, though larger firms may encounter constraints. Users must engage sales for larger implementations. While scalability ratings vary, the tool shows effectiveness for smaller teams and finite ventures, with some positive experiences in educational and medical settings.

Stability

Airtable is consistently reliable, with many users praising its stability. Some have noted occasional downtime and speed issues, particularly with larger user bases, but these are infrequent. Many rate stability ten out of ten, while a few give it a nine. Users appreciate the company's proactive communication during updates. Some challenges exist when high-volume use is involved, yet most experiences remain smooth, with bugs addressed quickly. Airtable handles transitions without significant disruptions.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Airtable Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Construction Company

University

Non Profit

Comms Service Provider

Government

Media Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Legal Firm

Agriculture

Consumer Goods Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Logistics Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Healthcare Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Insurance Company

Compare Airtable with alternative products

Learn more about Airtable

Our team brings experience from building and scaling products touching millions of people at Google, Facebook, Salesforce, Microsoft, Dropbox and other leading technology companies. We take pride in our product, and strive hard to provide the best possible experience for you, even if it requires creating new technologies and design paradigms along the way.

Airtable is an independent, private company headquartered in San Francisco. The company has raised over $63 million in funding from notable investors including: CRV, Caffeinated Capital, Freestyle Capital, Data Collective, Founder Collective, CrunchFund, and Box Group.