Adobe Workfront and Airtable are competing in the project management space. Adobe Workfront seems to have the upper hand in scalability and collaboration for larger enterprises, while Airtable shines with flexibility and ease of use for smaller teams.
Features: Adobe Workfront provides robust tools for task management, Gantt charts, and customizable dashboards that accommodate complex workflows. Airtable, on the other hand, offers a flexible grid interface, integration capabilities, and powerful templates ideal for dynamic structures.
Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could improve by streamlining its initial setup process, enhancing its user interface for a more intuitive experience, and reducing complexity for smaller teams. Airtable might focus on scaling features for larger organizations, offering advanced reporting capabilities, and improving its integration options with enterprise systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront requires thorough integration with existing enterprise systems, offering detailed customer support. Airtable is known for its straightforward setup and strong community support, facilitating rapid deployment and easy learning.
Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront's pricing corresponds with its enterprise-level capabilities, reflecting higher setup costs but significant ROI in productivity and oversight. Airtable provides more affordable pricing options, suitable for smaller budgets, and offers immediate ROI with user-friendly solutions.
We tracked all of the savings through Adobe Workfront, and at the end of the year, for those 2,500 users, we saved over 1,200 hours, or 1,200 man hours.
I can automate the process so it automatically populates data into the Airtable base and performs any necessary calculations.
They provide answers and guidance on how to resolve issues, such as clearing cookies and cache, and assist in best practice configuration and optimization of the platform.
It is considered a citizen admin system, and you don't need to be an IT professional to be an administrator.
If L5 does not understand, it moves to L4. If they can't solve it, it moves to a higher level.
We have gone from two or three marketing teams up to over 40 marketing teams and 6,500 users in a few years.
The solution is really scalable.
Adobe Workfront provides a stable foundation for project management.
Overall, I would rate the stability and reliability of Adobe Workfront a ten.
I have not faced any challenges with the stability of Adobe Workfront.
We can enhance integrations, such as ensuring Adobe Workfront integrates more seamlessly with other Adobe products like Experience Manager and Creative Cloud.
If I have issue-level data and project-level data that I need to see, with some custom coding, you can do some of it in a report, but in general, if you have a lot of that blended data between levels, you need to use a dashboard, which requires two different reports due to the difficulty in pulling data at the different levels into one thing.
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems.
If they show step-by-step guides for automations, this will help them attract more clients who are willing to learn and use their system.
This can include items such as mileage, supplies, software, licenses, and travel costs.
It provides comprehensive features with built-in integration for creative tools, addressing the pain point of creative collaboration in the content supply chain.
The system aids in supporting demand management and producing high-level status reports.
You can set up the complete workflow from start to end with Adobe Workfront, such as content creation, content publication, and getting that approval process, storing it somewhere.
Everybody has a particular base for different purposes, so you add information to those bases, and anybody can access it at any point in time anywhere in the world.
It was effective for easy reporting and data on our user feedback.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Adobe Workfront | 2.8% |
Airtable | 1.0% |
Other | 96.2% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 8 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 10 |
Large Enterprise | 3 |
AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.
Airtable was founded on the belief that software shouldn't dictate how you work – you should dictate how it works. Our mission is to democratize software creation by enabling anyone to build the software tools that meet their needs. Creators and creatives around the world use Airtable to do everything from cattle tracking to filmmaking, and they have great things to say.
Our team brings experience from building and scaling products touching millions of people at Google, Facebook, Salesforce, Microsoft, Dropbox and other leading technology companies. We take pride in our product, and strive hard to provide the best possible experience for you, even if it requires creating new technologies and design paradigms along the way.
Airtable is an independent, private company headquartered in San Francisco. The company has raised over $63 million in funding from notable investors including: CRV, Caffeinated Capital, Freestyle Capital, Data Collective, Founder Collective, CrunchFund, and Box Group.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.