Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Pipedrive Logo

Pipedrive Reviews

Vendor: Pipedrive
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Pipedrive?

Featured Pipedrive reviews

Pipedrive mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Pipedrive in the CRM category stands at 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Pipedrive0.8%
Microsoft Dynamics CRM4.5%
SAP CRM4.1%
Other90.6%
CRM

PeerResearch reports based on Pipedrive reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCRMSep 3, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 3, 2025Download
ComparisonPipedrive vs Microsoft Dynamics CRMSep 3, 2025Download
ComparisonPipedrive vs Salesforce Sales CloudSep 3, 2025Download
ComparisonPipedrive vs SAP CRMSep 3, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Dynamics CRM3.94.5%93%79 interviewsAdd to research
monday.com for Enterprise4.71.9%98%227 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise43
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Retailer
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
University
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Performing Arts
4%
Marketing Services Firm
4%
Legal Firm
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Sports Company
1%
 
Pipedrive Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Managing Director at Drebbel4.0We are a sales company using Pipedrive for managing client interactions. Its flexibility in pipelines and reporting is valuable, though the rising costs and limited integration options are drawbacks. We previously used Zoho, which didn't meet our needs.
Lead Consultant for Cloud Implementations at ZeroClick.ai4.5I use Pipedrive for managing client sales, enjoying its intuitive features like easy activity tracking, e-signature, and automation. While offering great flexibility and ROI, it could improve API usability and compliance issues with data center locations.
Director at Xander & Thomas4.5I use Pipedrive for CRM and appreciate its simplicity. However, new features sometimes feel like afterthoughts. I previously used Salesforce but chose Pipedrive from the start in my current company. We use a different cloud provider for deployment.
CTO, Retal Group at RETAL4.5I use Pipedrive for client actions and sales support, though integration with our ERP system remains a challenge. Future AI-driven integration improvements would be helpful. While considering alternatives like SAP or Salesforce, we intend to continue with Pipedrive.
Founder at AppCritic4.5Pipedrive is our go-to CRM for capturing leads and managing campaigns, offering flexible data structures and custom fields. While it needs better automation and segmentation features, it's effective overall and provides value, rated 7-8 out of 10 for ROI.
Recruiter at Emerge3.5We primarily use Pipedrive for sales funnel management, leveraging its automation for efficient client communication and deal tracking. While it's intuitive with good reporting features, its automation process could be more user-friendly compared to ActiveCampaign.
Co-Founder & Product Director Executive at AppUnion3.5No summary available
Automation Engineer at Freelance4.5I use Pipedrive for workflow management and find it valuable for generating a return on investment. It supports efficient processes without needing significant improvements. I haven't considered or used other solutions, and deployment details are not specified.