We performed a comparison between Airtable and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is very easy to use and flexible."
"Airtable's ability to bring people from different teams and geographies together into say a master calendar, with complete control over who sees what when and in what format, is highly beneficial for communications organizations."
"The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements."
"The relations and multiple-choice options are the most valuable features. For example, if I have one client but multiple projects in the same client, it's much easier to map it with Airtable than if I use a Google Sheet. The relationship between interfaces is a key feature that I use very often."
"The scripting extension enhances the things that you can do with Airtable."
"Airtable stands out for its exceptional user-friendliness, making it accessible to users of all skill levels. Its intuitive navigation ensures a smooth experience, allowing users to easily explore and comprehend its functionalities. Moreover, Airtable offers powerful automation capabilities that enhance efficiency. One particularly advantageous aspect is the seamless linking of databases, enabling the effortless creation of relational databases. Overall, this feature has proven to be immensely valuable and has been the primary focus of my usage."
"The solution makes it easy to structure data into simple data tables."
"I am impressed with the tool's continuous improvement. Every six months we get to see a completely different product. You can build a new product using no-code applications. We are able to scale up with the product."
"JQL, JIRA Query Language enables me to filter all the issues, display the items as I want."
"Overall, the solution is very nice and has a variety of great features."
"We have found the structure, functionality, and how Jira handles the tickets most valuable."
"The user story map is excellent. The features can be composed into stories and they can be allocated to each of the sprints in a program increment. It allows you to see all that in the user story map, and you have various dashboards to see the stories in various views. You can see them as a backlog view, for example, or you can see as an actual sprint view."
"The agile framework works well, and I pretty much live by that. Everything, such as sprint management, is laid out."
"Kanban board: The board is easy to use and visually impressive to non-IT users, who found it easy to relate to."
"Great for tracking my development team's productivity."
"It's easy to understand, and easy to navigate."
"The user interface should be more intuitive."
"Reporting, specifically anything involving exports, could be improved."
"The product is slow when I try to add data to a table using API. There is also a limit on the databases."
"The tool has changed the syncing time between the tables which has affected our multiple systems. I would like the product to add more calls per second to the API. It also needs to improve data storage. The tool starts to have problems after having huge amounts of data."
"The product's AI feature needs improvement."
"The template library is huge. I have a few suggestions with respect to that. But to complete automation, I think a bit more documentation around that would be really helpful because there are a lot of features in that which common people explore them less"
"They should allow us to duplicate the data to share it with others."
"It'd be nice if the record limit of 50,000 record limit per base on pro accounts were substantially higher."
"I would like to see test execution modules."
"The tool should improve its pricing."
"The next-generation software projects lack a lot, and I found quite a few bugs. There are some really basic things that you still cannot do. For instance, to put a mandatory due date for a task that you create in one of these projects is still not available. That's a bit of a block because people, especially those who are not technical, are not going to add anything if it's not mandatory. It's going to be difficult to teach them that they should do it anyway."
"In terms of improvement, I think Jira (Jira Agile, specifically) can be made more user-friendly. Most of the time, when people are somewhat used to the process, they find it easy to work with. But the thing is, if I want to create a sprint, I'd like the ability for it to come out like a kind of board or something like that. For example, they could offer something like a wizard for users who want to quickly create a sprint on the spot with a few clicks. I think that could be useful."
"I would like to have a future-proof idea of the cost and the roadmap for my class."
"We would like to see the integration of a lite-version of Confluence, just to manage some of the templates and documents."
"Something I would like to see improved is the traceability feature. When you have a user story, if you can see all the test cases, it would be an improvement if you could see any design documents or any change management."
"I'd like some more features around software testing. I'd like to see some more stuff done around data testing. That's what I'm most interested in."
Airtable is ranked 11th in Project Management Software with 11 reviews while Jira is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 263 reviews. Airtable is rated 8.8, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Airtable writes "An ERP tool for project tracking with continuous improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". Airtable is most compared with Spreadsheet.com, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Project, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM. See our Airtable vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
