It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
The cost for scalability is much cheaper than developing a new system.
Automation Anywhere is costlier than the general competition. That is aligned with the share of the market it has.
The cost for scalability is much cheaper than developing a new system.
Automation Anywhere is costlier than the general competition. That is aligned with the share of the market it has.
It's an expensive solution.
It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly.
It's an expensive solution.
It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly.
There is no cost for setup or licensing.
This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.
There is no cost for setup or licensing.
This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.
The product is becoming more and more expensive.
My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.
The product is becoming more and more expensive.
My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.
Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.
It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.
Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.
It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.
We have an enterprise account; it has worked great for our needs.
Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s).
We have an enterprise account; it has worked great for our needs.
Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s).
This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%.
Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them.
This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%.
Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them.
End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses.
It probably has a yearly license.
End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses.
It probably has a yearly license.
The tool is not really good at all because you need to purchase some additional tools.
We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.
The tool is not really good at all because you need to purchase some additional tools.
We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.
This is an open source solution so it does not cost anything for licensing or otherwise.
Appian is open-source, which is not licensed.
This is an open source solution so it does not cost anything for licensing or otherwise.
Appian is open-source, which is not licensed.
This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing.
There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more.
This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing.
There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more.
The cost is not that bad.
I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay.
The cost is not that bad.
I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay.
LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month.
This is an affordable product.
LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month.
This is an affordable product.
The solution is free.
The solution is free.
It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.
The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.
It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.
The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.
The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year.
The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year.
For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.
I think that the pricing is quite good.
For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.
I think that the pricing is quite good.
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.
We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee.
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.
We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee.
The solution is not expensive.
The solution is not expensive.
We got a deal on it for the first year. We're paying $8,000.
The product is not cheap.
We got a deal on it for the first year. We're paying $8,000.
The product is not cheap.
ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process.
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process.
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten.
The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten.
OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten.
The product could be more affordable.
OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten.
The product could be more affordable.
The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer.
The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer.
We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support.
We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support.
Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment.
Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment.
The cost should be reduced.
The cost should be reduced.
When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced.
When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced.
We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses.
We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses.
