Aug 24, 2016
Thanks all, it's encouraging to see so much support and responses
OpenText Functional Testing and Ranorex Studio compete in the testing tools category, each with unique strengths. OpenText has the upper hand in versatility and support for diverse technologies, while Ranorex Studio stands out for its code flexibility and ease of use.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports various OS environments and web browsers, handles Excel formats efficiently, and enables object and API testing across multiple platforms. Ranorex Studio offers cross-browser and mobile testing, intuitive test suite management, and customizable scripts with C#.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing suffers from sluggish performance, high memory usage, and complex deployment. Ranorex Studio could improve support for non-Windows systems and enhance test execution concurrency and performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText primarily uses on-premises deployment and has extensive setup requirements, with mixed reviews on customer service. Ranorex features a simpler installation process and generally favorable customer service with quick responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is expensive, reflecting its extensive features. High costs might deter smaller companies, but it promises long-term ROI for large enterprises. Ranorex Studio's flexible licensing suits smaller budgets, offering significant automation efficiency and ROI for straightforward solutions.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
