Aug 24, 2016
Thanks all, it's encouraging to see so much support and responses
OpenText Functional Testing and Ranorex Studio compete in the automation testing category. OpenText holds an edge with feature richness and compatibility across complex environments, while Ranorex is preferred for quick start-up and reduced complexity.
Features: OpenText supports various environments including desktop and mobile applications, robust functional and API testing tools, and VBScript and C# support aiding comprehensive automation. Ranorex provides a powerful C# coding environment, Ranorex Recorder for easy test automation, and seamless integration with CI tools like Jenkins.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance browser compatibility with Chrome and Safari, improve Agile methodology integration, and address system slowness. Ranorex would benefit from expanded OS support for Mac and Linux, refined mobile device handling, and broader programming language support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers flexibility with both on-premises and cloud deployment, though setup can be complex. Customer service is generally satisfactory despite reports of delayed responses. Ranorex also supports both deployment types and is praised for efficient setup and responsive support through third-party vendors.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is considered expensive, with pricing dependent on licenses and features, but offers ROI through reduced manual testing in complex environments. Ranorex's pricing is also high, but flexible licensing options like floating licenses offer cost management, with companies reporting satisfactory ROI due to efficient test execution.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| Ranorex Studio | 3.3% |
| Other | 87.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
