Inflectra Rapise vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Inflectra and Ranorex are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Inflectra is ranked #20 with an average rating of 4.0, while Ranorex is ranked #16. Inflectra holds a 0.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to Ranorex’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

714 Views
243 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,933 Views
2,464 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Inflectra Rapise and Ranorex Studio compete as test automation tools aimed at enhancing software testing efficiency. While Rapise stands out in pricing and customer support, Ranorex Studio's robust feature set suggests superior capabilities for potential investment value.

Features: Inflectra Rapise offers a versatile automation environment supporting multiple technologies and custom scripting, known for seamless integration with other systems. Ranorex Studio includes comprehensive automation features like record and playback, detailed reporting, and cross-browser testing. Its extensive feature set is advantageous for complex testing scenarios.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could improve in extending its feature set and enhancing ease of use for non-technical users. Ranorex Studio, while rich in features, might streamline its configuration process and improve its pricing tier flexibility, focusing on user-friendly enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise offers straightforward deployment with seamless installation and responsive customer support. Ranorex Studio provides a robust deployment experience, complemented by an extensive support network that adds value post-deployment despite initial complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise is effective in cost considerations, providing reasonable pricing and a quick return on investment through efficient automation. Ranorex Studio, although higher in initial cost, justifies its expense with advanced capabilities that promise enhanced long-term efficiency and ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Ranorex Studio

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (32nd), AI Quality Assurance (1st)

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (20th), Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ranorex Studio	4.2%
Inflectra Rapise	0.5%
Other	95.3%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"Object identification is good."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Government

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 46% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 20% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 2% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

December 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

December 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Also Known As

Rapise

No data available

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Ranorex Studio

December 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.