Ranorex Studio vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

Ranorex and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Ranorex is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5, while SmartBear is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3. Ranorex holds a 3.5% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,112 Views
1,566 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

380 Views
324 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ReadyAPI Test and Ranorex Studio compete in the software testing category, with each excelling in different areas. ReadyAPI Test seems to have an edge in API testing with comprehensive features for SOAP, REST, and JDBC services, while Ranorex Studio excels in UI automation across various platforms.

Features: ReadyAPI Test supports extensive SOAP, REST, and JDBC testing, alongside flexible project setup. It includes data-driven testing and web service simulation. Ranorex Studio provides robust UI automation with features like cross-browser testing, Ranorex Spy for object analysis, and integration with Visual Studio.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could improve IDE integration, reduce memory consumption, and enhance stability. It also needs better Git integration and more flexible licensing. Ranorex Studio requires improved browser compatibility and object recognition, particularly for non-.NET elements. It could benefit from broader OS support beyond Windows and enhanced mobile testing features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test is mainly deployed on-premises, receiving positive feedback for ease of setup. Online support is generally helpful, though some users report slow response times. Ranorex Studio supports both on-premises and cloud deployments, with user-reported high ratings for support and quick response times, despite some delays in bug resolution.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test's pricing is considered high but justifiable by its features and ROI, with an open-source version as a more affordable option. Ranorex Studio also presents a high cost but offers flexible licensing options, integrating well across platforms and providing a reasonable ROI despite initial expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI Test

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (11th)

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

21st

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Faiz Ahmed

Test Automation Specialist / Lead at Tata Consultancy Services

You can achieve any complex task with this tool

There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases. For example, it would be nice to have a Selenium plugin available from the menu, where I can select "open browser" and provide the URL. That URL would be immediately open in the browser. This is like a keyword, and then the Selenium plugin should be there.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"The solution is stable."

"Object identification is good."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly."

"It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."

"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."

"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."

"It's a very simple solution to use."

Cons

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."

"The UI should be improved."

"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."

"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."

"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."

"The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user."

"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

"SoapUI Pro could improve by having dashboards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"The cost is not that bad."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"It is free of charge."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?

The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Postman vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 73% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 10% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 5% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

April 2025

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI Test

April 2025

Free Report: Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.