Ranorex Studio vs Testim comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranorex Logo
3,069 views|2,263 comparisons
Testim Logo
1,883 views|1,202 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ranorex Studio and Testim based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. Testim Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy.""The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback.""The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface.""The solution is stable.""I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective.""The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance.""Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.""This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

More Ranorex Studio Pros →

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests.""The product is easy to use.""It is a highly stable solution.""Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code.""The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers.""The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios.""The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

More Testim Pros →

Cons
"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier.""If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.""The solution's technical support team could be responsive.""When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.""Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).""Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful.""Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls).""For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

More Ranorex Studio Cons →

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling.""I get a little bit confused while creating new branches.""The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level.""There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it.""There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements.""The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind.""The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

More Testim Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."
  • "The licensing fees depend on the number of users."
  • "There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."
  • "This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."
  • More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is not expensive."
  • "The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."
  • "I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."
  • More Testim Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.
    Top Answer:I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.
    Top Answer:There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language… more »
    Top Answer:It is a highly stable solution.
    Top Answer:The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company.
    Top Answer:There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    3,069
    Comparisons
    2,263
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.0
    17th
    Views
    1,883
    Comparisons
    1,202
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    706
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

    Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

    Sample Customers
    Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
    Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Educational Organization9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ranorex Studio vs. Testim
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ranorex Studio is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews while Testim is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews. Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0, while Testim is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Testim writes "A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment". Ranorex Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, froglogic Squish and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas Testim is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Functionize, Applitools and TestProject. See our Ranorex Studio vs. Testim report.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.