Parasoft SOAtest vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Parasoft and Ranorex are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Ranorex is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5. Parasoft holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Ranorex’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

540 Views
336 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,112 Views
1,566 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Ranorex Studio compete in the realm of software testing tools, each offering unique strengths for specific testing needs. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand in complex API and end-to-end testing capabilities, whereas Ranorex Studio offers significant advantages in ease of use and cross-platform testing for desktop and mobile applications.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest is robust in API testing, supporting protocols like SOAP and REST, with tools for validation, data-driven testing, and continuous integration. It excels in handling virtual environments and end-to-end testing. Ranorex Studio provides strong testing for desktop and mobile applications using C# scripting, supports API integrations, and is notable for its user-friendly approach in constructing test scripts.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its reporting, interface, and performance, and expand integration capabilities with management tools, addressing complexity and resource use. Ranorex Studio could improve support for non-Windows OS, refine object recognition, and bolster mobile testing features, while also clarifying licensing and improving testing parallelism.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions prioritize on-premises deployment, with Parasoft offering hybrid cloud options. Parasoft's customer service is considered moderately good but inconsistent by some, while Ranorex Studio receives favorable feedback, especially from Microsoft product users.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is costly but often justified by its comprehensive features, with ROI occasionally exceeding 95%. Its complex licensing model may affect larger organizations. Ranorex Studio is also expensive, yet flexible licensing aids cost distribution, considered fair for small to medium enterprises seeking strong automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (28th), API Testing Tools (11th)

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"The solution is scalable."

"Technical support is helpful."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"One of the most valuable features I found in Parasoft SOAtest is its ability to extend the product."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"The solution is stable."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

"Object identification is good."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"The performance could be a bit better."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls)."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 23% of the time

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex Studio

April 2025

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.