Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Keysight Technologies and Ranorex are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Ranorex is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to Ranorex’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 18 Eggplant Test reviews

3,975 Views
2,465 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,175 Views
2,699 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Ranorex Studio and Eggplant Test compete in automation testing. While both offer strong features, Ranorex Studio has an upper hand due to its superior code control and customization with C#, appealing to more technical users.

Features: Ranorex Studio offers C# code control, an easy test recording and execution interface, and comprehensive element recognition. It also benefits from robust support forums and cross-platform capabilities. Eggplant Test provides strong OCR technology, AI-driven automation, and image recognition, enhancing versatility across various platforms.

Room for Improvement: Ranorex Studio needs to improve support for non-Windows systems, enhance coding interface flexibility, and strengthen compatibility with non-.NET applications. Eggplant Test could improve in user-friendliness, integration with external tools, and expand support for more programming languages.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio supports on-premises deployment with reliable customer support praised for responsiveness. It encourages community support benefits. Eggplant Test offers both on-premises and cloud deployment, providing similar customer service levels but faces licensing complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio is considered expensive, utilizing a licensing model that offers flexibility and good ROI by reducing manual regression efforts. Eggplant Test is more expensive, targeting larger enterprises with its robust features. Its ROI is enhanced through saving manual testing hours and flexible licensing. Some users appreciate Eggplant’s support-inclusive pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (8th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (16th), Mobile App Testing Tools (7th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.9%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.7%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The solution is a stable one."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

More Eggplant Test pros

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"Object identification is good."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"It has low productivity."

"There was no free trial in it."

More Eggplant Test cons

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls)."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 20% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 23% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

July 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

July 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio

July 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.