Ranorex Studio vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

Ranorex and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Ranorex is ranked #19, while Zeenyx is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0. Ranorex holds a 3.3% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,078 Views
1,878 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews

801 Views
521 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Zeenyx AscentialTest and Ranorex Studio compete in the testing platform category. Ranorex Studio often holds a competitive edge due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Zeenyx AscentialTest offers scriptless testing, advanced test case management, and visual test case creation, making it accessible to non-technical users. Ranorex Studio provides extensive integration options, cross-platform testing, and detailed reporting, addressing a wider array of testing needs.

Room for Improvement: Zeenyx AscentialTest could enhance support for complex integrations and expand cross-platform capabilities. Additional reporting features would also be beneficial. Meanwhile, Ranorex Studio might improve ease of use for beginners and offer additional flexibility in test script customization, alongside enhancements in mobile testing support and optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest ensures a straightforward installation and offers responsive customer support suited for teams seeking personalized assistance. Ranorex Studio provides seamless deployment complemented by robust technical support and vast online resources to facilitate user adoption.

Pricing and ROI: Zeenyx AscentialTest is affordable, appealing to small and medium enterprises with budget constraints, providing competitive ROI through reduced automation time. Ranorex Studio requires higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI with its rich functionalities and scalability, making it attractive to larger organizations preferring feature-rich solutions despite cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), Regression Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (16th)

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.3%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zeenyx AscentialTest	0.8%
Ranorex Studio	3.3%
Other	95.9%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Tobias Roth

Software developer at Weiss GmbH Softwarelösungen

Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration

The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

"Object identification is good."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."

"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."

"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."

"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training."

Cons

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."

"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."

"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."

"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

22%

University

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?

AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?

While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?

We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 20% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 20% of the time

Galen Framework vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 15% of the time

TFS vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 13% of the time

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

January 2026

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Zeenyx AscentialTest

January 2026

Download Zeenyx AscentialTest product report

Also Known As

No data available

AscentialTest

Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.

Zeenyx

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

January 2026

Free Report: Ranorex Studio vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ranorex Studio vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.