Panaya Test Dynamix vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Panaya and Ranorex are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Panaya is ranked #26, while Ranorex is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5. Panaya holds a 1.3% mindshare in FT, compared to Ranorex’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Panaya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

791 Views
370 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

1,952 Views
994 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Ranorex Studio and Panaya Test Dynamix are competitive tools in the software testing space. While Panaya Test Dynamix has a notable lead in feature capability, Ranorex Studio excels in pricing and support, offering greater value in these areas.

Features: Ranorex Studio offers powerful automation capabilities, reliable cross-browser testing, and extensive reporting tools. It also utilizes strong UI recognition and is easy to maintain. Panaya Test Dynamix stands out with comprehensive end-to-end test management capabilities, seamless integration with enterprise systems, and flexibility in managing a large volume of tests.

Room for Improvement: Ranorex Studio could improve its feature set to compete with more comprehensive testing tools and enhance its strategic deployment options. Its limited integration with enterprise systems is another area for enhancement. Panaya Test Dynamix could benefit from a more intuitive initial setup process, better handling of smaller projects or teams, and improved direct integration options beyond large-scale enterprise systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio offers straightforward deployment and excellent customer service support, providing quick resolutions and hands-on assistance. Panaya Test Dynamix features flexible cloud-based deployment, integrating smoothly into existing IT environments. Although its customer service is efficient, the complex setup requires additional time and effort, making Ranorex more attractive for smaller teams seeking simplicity, whereas Panaya suits larger enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio presents a lower initial setup cost and offers a quicker ROI with its competitive pricing model. Panaya Test Dynamix tends to have higher upfront costs but justifies these with extensive functionality that can deliver significant long-term ROI. For businesses prioritizing immediate budget concerns, Ranorex Studio offers a more appealing financial path, yet Panaya's potential ROI makes it a compelling investment for extensive testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Ranorex Studio

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (7th), Test Management Tools (19th)

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

15th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.4%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"Object identification is good."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 61% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 14% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 5% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

June 2025

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

June 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Overview

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Panaya

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Ranorex Studio

May 2025

Free Report: Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.