Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo

Top 10 KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Alternatives

Vendor: Quest Software
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and Fortinet FortiClient. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive inventory management, automated patching, and streamlined deployment processes, ensuring efficient IT asset management and reducing operational complexity for organizations through its intuitive interface.

Quest Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Quest Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in cloud administration and integration within its ecosystem. In comparison, KACE SMA is preferred for comprehensive IT asset management in diverse environments, offering flexible licensing. Intune suits Microsoft-centric settings, while KACE meets diverse platform needs.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune generally has lower setup costs, offering a straightforward onboarding process, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a more complex setup with potentially higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune generally has lower setup costs, offering a straightforward onboarding process, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a more complex setup with potentially higher initial costs.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in automation and integrates with Microsoft products, suiting larger enterprises. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance offers ease of use and cost-effectiveness, ideal for smaller businesses seeking inventory management and flexible deployment without resource intensity.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager involves higher setup costs, while KACE Systems Management Appliance offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager involves higher setup costs, while KACE Systems Management Appliance offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in IT management with tools like automated deployments, while Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes security features such as VPN integration. In comparison, FortiClient's licensing flexibility attracts budget-conscious buyers, whereas KACE offers comprehensive oversight, ideal for extensive IT infrastructures.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to the more economical setup of Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a clear difference in initial investment between the two systems.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to the more economical setup of Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a clear difference in initial investment between the two systems.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.0 out of 5
KACE SMA integrates varied environments with automation and asset management, ideal for large-scale operations. In comparison, NinjaOne prioritizes remote management and SaaS deployment, perfect for small enterprises seeking flexibility and affordability. NinjaOne's device monitoring complements its cost-effective subscription model.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. NinjaOne Report
The KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
The KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable setup process.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky provides robust security features like antivirus and encryption, making it ideal for comprehensive endpoint protection. In comparison, KACE excels in asset management with tools for software deployment and patch management, offering an effective solution for organizations prioritizing efficient IT management.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has lower setup costs compared to the KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a cost-effective option for businesses prioritizing budget while needing robust endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has lower setup costs compared to the KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a cost-effective option for businesses prioritizing budget while needing robust endpoint security solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix is ideal for comprehensive endpoint management with customizable reports and a centralized inventory view. In comparison, KACE SMA excels in user-friendly software distribution and integration, offering flexibility with cloud and on-premises options to address various IT asset management needs efficiently.
Download BigFix vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
BigFix's setup cost is typically higher, reflecting its robust capabilities, while KACE SMA offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix's setup cost is typically higher, reflecting its robust capabilities, while KACE SMA offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform offers robust threat protection with extensive asset visibility, enhancing security without relying on 802.1x. In comparison, KACE SMA excels in endpoint management, emphasizing software distribution and patch management. Forescout may face high costs; KACE SMA provides straightforward pricing with valuable endpoint management capabilities.
Download Forescout Platform vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Forescout Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Endpoint Central attracts cost-conscious buyers with pricing per asset and ROI through automation. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance appeals for its seamless integration, robust offerings, and effectiveness in larger installations, charging per device while extending functionalities without extra costs.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central Report
ManageEngine Endpoint Central features a competitive setup cost, contrasting with KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which incurs a higher implementation expense, highlighting a significant pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Endpoint Central features a competitive setup cost, contrasting with KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which incurs a higher implementation expense, highlighting a significant pricing difference.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
KACE SMA integrates versatile tools for centralized device management, excelling in endpoint efficiency for widespread organizations. In comparison, Atera's cross-platform capabilities and cost-effective pricing cater to smaller companies, offering flexible remote management and scalability without hardware constraints.
Download Atera vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial setup cost, while Atera offers a more affordable setup. The comparison highlights the significant price difference in setup expenses between the two management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial setup cost, while Atera offers a more affordable setup. The comparison highlights the significant price difference in setup expenses between the two management solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Kaseya VSA offers strong remote management and patch capabilities with versatile deployment options. In comparison, KACE SMA excels in asset management and intuitive software deployment, providing reliable customer service. KACE SMA is favored for large implementations with a competitive pricing structure.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Kaseya VSA Report
Kaseya VSA has a more straightforward setup cost, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves higher initial fees, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA has a more straightforward setup cost, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves higher initial fees, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
KACE SMA excels in asset management and endpoint efficiency with versatile deployment and attractive pricing for robust management. In comparison, Vicarius vRx offers unique automated vulnerability features, cloud-centric simplicity, and affordable scalability for effective cybersecurity, especially suitable for small to medium enterprises.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Vicarius vRx Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often incurs a higher setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, which tends to be more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often incurs a higher setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, which tends to be more budget-friendly.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is noted for affordability and support, with robust asset management meeting compliance needs. In comparison, ConnectWise RMM offers advanced automation and monitoring, justifying higher investment with diverse features suitable for dynamic IT environments.
Download ConnectWise RMM vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a lower setup cost than ConnectWise RMM, highlighting affordability. In contrast, ConnectWise RMM offers a more comprehensive feature set, which may justify its higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a lower setup cost than ConnectWise RMM, highlighting affordability. In contrast, ConnectWise RMM offers a more comprehensive feature set, which may justify its higher initial setup cost.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in endpoint management for larger IT departments with extensive asset management features. In comparison, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus emphasizes efficient patch automation and reporting, ideal for environments prioritizing compliance and rapid deployment.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report
The setup cost for KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is higher, offering robust features, while ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus presents a lower initial investment, appealing for budget-conscious users focusing on essential patch management functions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is higher, offering robust features, while ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus presents a lower initial investment, appealing for budget-conscious users focusing on essential patch management functions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
KACE SMA excels in customization and integration capabilities, making it suitable for complex infrastructures. In comparison, Automox offers a modern cloud-based approach, ensuring better flexibility and security, appealing to organizations prioritizing remote operations and streamlined deployment.
Download Automox vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires an initial setup cost, whereas Automox is known for its simplicity with no upfront fees, highlighting a difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires an initial setup cost, whereas Automox is known for its simplicity with no upfront fees, highlighting a difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
3.9 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers robust endpoint management and integration, excelling in asset tools and ROI benefits. In comparison, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services focuses on patch management and updates within Windows, offering cost-effective deployment integrated with the Windows infrastructure.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost but offers robust features, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is more budget-friendly with basic functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost but offers robust features, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is more budget-friendly with basic functionalities.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti stands out for its competitive pricing and comprehensive endpoint protection, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, KACE is notable for superior automation and diverse OS support, offering extensive features and integration, making it suitable for complex environments seeking versatile management solutions.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a competitive setup cost, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents a notable difference in initial pricing, highlighting a clear choice depending on budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a competitive setup cost, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents a notable difference in initial pricing, highlighting a clear choice depending on budget constraints.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in asset management and reporting, appealing to organizations needing detailed network control. In comparison, Scalefusion's mobile management and cost-effective solutions attract businesses with diverse endpoints, prioritizing easy deployment and quick ROI despite KACE's superior support.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Scalefusion Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically involves higher setup costs compared to Scalefusion, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically involves higher setup costs compared to Scalefusion, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BMC Helix Client Management
4.3 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in deployment automation and endpoint management, justifying its cost with robust features, while BMC Helix Client Management is praised for solid remote control and cost-efficiency. In comparison, BMC offers better affordability, but KACE provides stronger customer service and ROI.
Download BMC Helix Client Management vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial setup cost compared to BMC Helix Client Management, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial setup cost compared to BMC Helix Client Management, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in comprehensive endpoint management, with strong integration capabilities. In comparison, GFI LanGuard is noted for its vulnerability assessment strengths and competitive pricing, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing security solutions. Both offer solid return on investment based on needs.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often involves higher setup costs, while GFI LanGuard offers more affordable initial setup options. SMA is generally suited for organizations valuing robust management features, whereas LanGuard is appealing for those prioritizing cost-efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often involves higher setup costs, while GFI LanGuard offers more affordable initial setup options. SMA is generally suited for organizations valuing robust management features, whereas LanGuard is appealing for those prioritizing cost-efficiency.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
3.9 out of 5
KACE SMA offers diverse capabilities like imaging and asset management, providing flexibility in deployment. In comparison, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune focuses on efficient third-party patch management, suitable for smaller implementations, though it may lack KACE's comprehensive feature set.
Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost, while Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost, while Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune offers a more affordable initial investment.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager
3.8 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance is ideal for its ease in pricing and support with robust device management features. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers superior features like vulnerability assessment and justifies its cost with a complete endpoint management experience.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance has higher initial setup costs, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers a lower setup investment. Ivanti prioritizes cost-effectiveness, whereas KACE emphasizes comprehensive management features despite the expense.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance has higher initial setup costs, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers a lower setup investment. Ivanti prioritizes cost-effectiveness, whereas KACE emphasizes comprehensive management features despite the expense.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac
4.5 out of 5
KACE SMA attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing, extensive support, and simplified deployment. In comparison, Ivanti Patch appeals due to advanced security features and seamless integration across platforms, offering value through robust patch management and potentially greater ROI despite higher initial costs.
Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has straightforward setup costs, while Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac requires a more complex installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has straightforward setup costs, while Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac requires a more complex installation process.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
SolarWinds Patch Manager
1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in affordability and customer support, offering comprehensive management features. In comparison, SolarWinds Patch Manager provides superior patch management and automation. Tech buyers may choose KACE for cost-effective management or SolarWinds for advanced update processes.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) includes a higher setup cost compared to SolarWinds Patch Manager, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) includes a higher setup cost compared to SolarWinds Patch Manager, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

Related categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
Client Desktop Management
Endpoint Compliance