Top 10 Mimecast Advanced Email Security Alternatives

Name: Mimecast Advanced Email Security
Brand: Mimecast
Rating: 4.0 (44 reviews)

Vendor: Mimecast

4.0 out of 5

44 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Mimecast Advanced Email Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Mimecast Advanced Email Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare One, Cisco Umbrella, and Microsoft Defender for Office 365. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Mimecast Advanced Email Security surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat intelligence, adaptive security measures, and comprehensive protection against phishing, impersonation, and ransomware, ensuring superior email defense and trusted communication channels for organizations globally.

Mimecast Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Mimecast, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cloudflare One

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare One

4.3 out of 5

Mimecast Advanced Email Security focuses on email threat prevention with features like sandboxing and phishing prevention. In comparison, Cloudflare One excels in web protection and DDoS mitigation, appealing to buyers valuing CDN performance and ease of integration with modern cloud environments.

Download Cloudflare One vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a higher setup cost while Cloudflare One offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting distinct cost structures.

View comparison

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a higher setup cost while Cloudflare One offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting distinct cost structures.

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella focuses on DNS-based protection with DNS-layer security and integrates into hybrid environments. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security targets email protection with threat remediation and archiving. Cisco Umbrella provides high security and flexibility, while Mimecast is known for comprehensive email threat management.

Download Cisco Umbrella vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella has a moderate setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security involves higher initial expenses; this highlights a significant cost difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella has a moderate setup cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security involves higher initial expenses; this highlights a significant cost difference between the two solutions.

Microsoft Defender for Office 365

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Office 365

4.2 out of 5

Mimecast excels in email filtering and training resources, appealing to those seeking robust anti-phishing tools. In comparison, Microsoft Defender's AI-driven threat detection and seamless Office 365 integration attract buyers valuing proactive defense and streamlined Microsoft ecosystem compatibility.

Download Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a competitively lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Office 365, which offers greater integration with other Microsoft tools as its primary advantage.

View comparison

Pricing

Proofpoint Email Protection

4.2 out of 5

Proofpoint Email Protection

4.2 out of 5

Proofpoint Email Protection offers granular control with advanced security features, making it suitable for businesses needing robust threat defenses. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides comprehensive threat protection with a simpler interface, appealing to those prioritizing ease of use and straightforward setup.

Download Mimecast Advanced Email Security vs. Proofpoint Email Protection Report

Pricing

Proofpoint Email Protection has a higher setup cost compared to Mimecast Advanced Email Security, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing structures.

View comparison

Pricing

Proofpoint Email Protection has a higher setup cost compared to Mimecast Advanced Email Security, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing structures.

Abnormal Security

4.7 out of 5

Abnormal Security

4.7 out of 5

Mimecast provides robust threat remediation and integration with Microsoft 365, appealing to those needing real-time alerts. In comparison, Abnormal Security, with its AI-driven threat detection, suits buyers focusing on adaptive learning and API-based architecture for enhanced email security.

Download Abnormal Security vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security involves a moderate setup cost, while Abnormal Security typically incurs lower expenses. Abnormal Security may provide a cost-effective solution for users prioritizing budget considerations over additional advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Secure Access

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Secure Access

4.3 out of 5

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is known for effective phishing prevention and seamless Microsoft 365 integration. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access excels in secure distributed networks and robust AI-driven policy management, catering to environments requiring AI-enhanced security and extensive global coverage through seamless component integrations.

Download Cisco Secure Access vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security typically involves a low setup cost, whereas Cisco Secure Access may have a higher initial expenditure, highlighting a cost differential between the two.

View comparison

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security typically involves a low setup cost, whereas Cisco Secure Access may have a higher initial expenditure, highlighting a cost differential between the two.

Kiteworks

4.3 out of 5

Kiteworks

4.3 out of 5

Kiteworks excels in secure collaboration and budget-friendly pricing, ideal for industries needing data protection and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides robust threat protection and comprehensive features, suitable for organizations prioritizing security despite a complex configuration and higher price point.

Download Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Kiteworks setup cost is minimal, offering affordability for startups, whereas Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a significant initial setup investment, focusing on enterprise-level security.

View comparison

Pricing

Kiteworks setup cost is minimal, offering affordability for startups, whereas Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a significant initial setup investment, focusing on enterprise-level security.

Barracuda Email Protection

4.4 out of 5

Barracuda Email Protection

4.4 out of 5

Mimecast offers advanced threat detection with features like email filtering and sandboxing, appealing to tech buyers needing premium security. In comparison, Barracuda attracts budget-conscious buyers with cost-effective email protection and ease of integration, particularly with Microsoft 365.

Download Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security has minimal setup costs, while Barracuda Email Protection requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Mimecast Advanced Email Security has minimal setup costs, while Barracuda Email Protection requires a higher initial investment.

Trellix Collaboration Security

4.4 out of 5

Trellix Collaboration Security

4.4 out of 5

Trellix Collaboration Security is ideal for those seeking extensive network integration and customization. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security excels in email-specific features like sandboxing and archiving, appealing to those prioritizing ease of use and robust email threat defenses.

Download Mimecast Advanced Email Security vs. Trellix Collaboration Security Report

Pricing

Trellix Collaboration Security has a lower setup cost compared to Mimecast Advanced Email Security, which offers more comprehensive initial features.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Collaboration Security has a lower setup cost compared to Mimecast Advanced Email Security, which offers more comprehensive initial features.

Barracuda Email Security Gateway

4.0 out of 5

Barracuda Email Security Gateway

4.0 out of 5

Barracuda Email Security Gateway excels in integration capabilities and offers cost-effective security. In comparison, Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides robust filtering and seamless Microsoft 365 integration. Tech buyers might select Barracuda for value and flexibility, while Mimecast suits those prioritizing advanced features and seamless integration.

Download Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report

Pricing

Barracuda Email Security Gateway offers a straightforward setup at a potentially lower cost, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security may have a more comprehensive setup that could require a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 21 more products

Related categories

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Email Archiving

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)