Avanan vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security comparison

Avanan offers advanced threat detection for protecting against phishing and malware, utilizing strong AI algorithms and seamless integration with platforms like Office 365. Its cloud-based, customizable security rules ensure efficient data protection suitable for diverse organizational sizes.

Avanan's platform is designed for email security across cloud and on-premises environments, protecting against threats like ransomware and DDoS attacks. With features such as real-time threat detection and advanced filtering, it integrates effortlessly with Microsoft 365. Organizations appreciate its user-friendly interface that allows for easy deployment and management. While possessing cost-effective qualities, Avanan might improve in SaaS integration, AI logic, and technical support with Check Point. Some users suggest enhancements like better mobile compatibility and faster threat response. The system's documentation and querying functionalities could also see refinement, addressing concerns for SMEs.

• Advanced Threat Detection: Quickly identifies phishing and malware.
• Anti-Malware: Supports Office 365 and Box.com with strong AI algorithms.
• Sandboxing Capability: Quarantines suspicious emails efficiently.
• Seamless Integration: Compatible with tools like Office 365 and Slack.
• Customizable Security: Offers cloud-based, always-on protection.

• Cost-Effectiveness: Ideal for organizations of all sizes.
• Ease of Implementation: Quick and easy setup process.
• User-Friendly Management: Simplifies threat management and data protection.
• Enhanced Data Protection: Comprehensive security across environments.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Avanan is implemented widely to protect sensitive communications and ensure compliance with data protection regulations. Its flexibility makes it suitable for sectors requiring robust security measures, leveraging cloud-based solutions for real-time threat mitigation and data leak prevention.

Mimecast Email Security protects organizations against phishing, malware, business email compromise, and impersonation attacks, with detection built on 20 years of experience and over 1.3 billion emails inspected daily. It's available as a secure email gateway (MX-based) for full control over complex, multi-region environments, or via API integration with Microsoft 365, which deploys in hours with no MX changes. Administrators get a single console for policy management, monitoring external communications, and customizing configurations, and can pair it with Mimecast Cloud Archive for long-term email retention and compliance.

What key features should users explore?

• Sandboxing: Full emulation sandboxing and AI-driven static analysis detect threats in attachments before delivery.
• Spam and Phishing Protection: Multi-layered detection catches both payload-based attacks and payloadless, socially-engineered BEC attempts.
• URL Inspection: Computer Vision AI analyzes destination pages to catch phishing and brand impersonation.
• API Deployment Option: Deploys in hours without MX or mail flow changes, with 30-day historical scanning to show threats your current defenses missed.
• Email Archiving (via Cloud Archive): Secure long-term storage supporting compliance needs.

What benefits can impact ROI?

• Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to standards like HIPAA through retention and monitoring.
• Integration: Deep integration with Microsoft 365, deployable as a gateway or via API depending on your environment.
• Rapid Time to Value: API deployment proves protection value in hours, before any infrastructure commitment.
• Threat Prevention: Detection engines refined daily against 1.3 billion emails, trusted by 42,000 customers globally.

Industries and use cases

Mimecast Email Security is used across industries, including healthcare and finance, to secure inbound and outbound communications and support compliance requirements. Enterprises use it as a gateway, an API-based layer on top of Microsoft 365, or both, depending on how much control versus deployment speed they need.