Kiteworks vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security comparison

Kiteworks and Mimecast are both solutions in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category. Kiteworks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Mimecast is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Kiteworks holds a 0.7% mindshare in SEG, compared to Mimecast’s 16.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

3,236 Views
97 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Read 31 Mimecast Advanced Email Security reviews

5,792 Views
1,969 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2026

Kiteworks and Mimecast Advanced Email Security compete in the email security and communication management category. Mimecast Advanced Email Security seems to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set offering robust protection capabilities.

Features: Kiteworks emphasizes secure communications with streamlined compliance management, user collaboration, and sharing capabilities. Mimecast Advanced Email Security focuses on advanced threat protection, email archiving, and continuity services, prioritizing cybersecurity and email integrity.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance features related to file access control and reporting granularity. Improving user interface flexibility could also be beneficial. Mimecast Advanced Email Security could work on simplifying some aspects of customization and enhancing user training resources. Addressing feedback on interface complexity might improve user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks offers a straightforward deployment model with supportive services enabling rapid adaptation. Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides seamless deployment with detailed documentation and dedicated support. While both products offer efficient integration, Kiteworks' support services are noted for their responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks is recognized for cost efficiency and appealing ROI, fitting budget-conscious organizations. Mimecast Advanced Email Security, although pricier, is seen as offering good ROI because of its extensive features and security capabilities. Despite higher costs, its value justifies the greater initial investment for feature-rich solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Email Security (29th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (13th)

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Office 365 Protection (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Advanced Email Security is 16.5%, up from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Mimecast Email Security	16.5%
Kiteworks	0.7%
Other	82.8%

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Test Logix

Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity

Experience high detection and user-friendly policies with reliable email security implementation

The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary. As an IT engineer, I understand how it works, but explaining it to another IT person can be difficult. Having more user-friendly dashboards would improve the work experience. In Mimecast Email Security, checking policies in the dictionary or gateway is very complicated, and not everyone understands this process. If you examine the Check Point portal, it's user-friendly with easily accessible tabs that anyone can explore. With Mimecast Email Security, making changes might impact existing mailboxes. The portal is complicated compared to Check Point's user-friendly interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"The solution can be used remotely; it's easy to upload and share files."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"Scalability is impressive."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

More Kiteworks pros

"It does a good job for us, and its admin console is easy to use."

"Mimecast certainly helped my customers reduce phishing emails."

"We like Mimecast's spam filtering. The email signature feature is also a big plus for our users."

"The reviewer gave Mimecast Email Security a rating of 10 out of 10."

"Email security is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"I recommend Mimecast based on customer requirements and budget."

"The solution offers good technical support."

"The initial setup is easy."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security pros

Cons

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"File location could be improved."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

More Kiteworks cons

"From an administrative point of view, Mimecast is a little bit cumbersome and difficult. It's not something that the end-user can easily find navigate themselves."

"The reaction time between a new threat being identified and Mimecast picking it up needs to be narrowed a bit."

"We discussed the phishing aspect, the DNS system, and the key rotation."

"The solution should include more AI features instead of Mimecast's more general static configuration tooling."

"Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competition in the Indian market, and the local presence is lacking as they do not have a local representative currently."

"The product's interface could be improved to be more user-friendly."

"The feature that should be included is to remove the block on the encrypted files."

"The filtering needs more flexibility."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product price is moderate. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The licensing costs are per-user for the product that you get with them."

"The customers can select the license packages as per their requirements."

"Compared to the other solutions in the market, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection's pricing is fine."

"It's an expensive solution."

"I'm always going to say the price needs to be lower, but it's reasonable."

"The product has good pricing in terms of return on investment."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 13% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 9% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 12% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 11% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 6% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

January 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Advanced Email Security

January 2026

Download Mimecast Advanced Email Security product report

Also Known As

Accellion

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides essential features like spam filtering, email archiving, and threat remediation, enhancing email protection. Its integration with Microsoft 365 and user-friendly administration console improve usability while blocking phishing and imposter attacks.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is an important tool for organizations combating email threats such as phishing and malicious attachments. Acting as a cloud-based email gateway, it delivers threat protection and email archiving while supporting compliance requirements like HIPAA. Features such as URL inspection, identity protection, impersonation policies, and DMARC Analyzer ensure robust security. Despite its comprehensive capabilities, users find pricing high with room for improvement in detection rates and interface simplification. Additionally, blocking flexibility and outbound mail server blocklisting challenges signal areas for enhancement.

What are the key features?

Spam Filtering: Effective at blocking spam and maintaining inbox cleanliness.
Email Archiving: Provides secure storage of emails for compliance and retrieval.
Sandboxing: Safely tests attachments and links before delivery.
Threat Remediation: Responds to detected threats swiftly across the network.
URL Inspection: Analyzes links for harmful content to prevent phishing.

What benefits can organizations expect?

Scalability: Suitable for both large enterprises and smaller clients enhancing network safety.
Customization: Offers advanced features tailoring to specific needs.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Microsoft 365, enhancing operational efficiency.
Performance: Reliably prevents malicious threats ensuring email security.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is deployed across industries like healthcare, finance, and legal sectors where email threats are prevalent. Companies leverage phishing detection, data compliance, and behavior analysis with ease due to its scalable and cloud-based capabilities. Its robust features support enhanced protection and communication integrity.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

December 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security report.

See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.