Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Domo based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Power BI, Tableau Enterprise, and Azure Data Factory.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Domo surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled data visualization, real-time dashboards, and seamless integration with a wide range of data sources, empowering businesses to make data-driven decisions efficiently.
Domo Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Domo, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Domo excels in ETL and visualization, offering ease for non-technical users but lacks advanced analytics. In comparison, Microsoft Power BI provides robust analytics, integrating well with Excel, suitable for detailed analysis, but struggles with scalability and large datasets. Both offer significant ROI advantages.
Tableau Enterprise excels in data integration and visualization with real-time analytics, appealing to those focused on comprehensive insights. In comparison, Domo shines with built-in ETL and user-friendly design, ideal for businesses prioritizing efficient data handling and rapid prototyping.
Domo offers rapid dashboard creation and extensive connectors, aiding non-technical users in data accessibility. In comparison, Azure Data Factory provides comprehensive ETL functionalities and robust integration with Azure services, ideal for complex analytics but requires data engineering familiarity.
Domo features a higher setup cost according to user feedback, while Azure Data Factory is noted for being more budget-friendly in its initial setup expenses. This difference highlights a key contrast between the two data solutions.
Domo features a higher setup cost according to user feedback, while Azure Data Factory is noted for being more budget-friendly in its initial setup expenses. This difference highlights a key contrast between the two data solutions.
Informatica PowerCenter excels in data integration, ideal for complex processes needing robust backend management. In comparison, Domo's strength lies in data visualization and real-time analytics, offering an intuitive dashboard experience. Informatica suits large-scale needs, while Domo benefits from cloud-based flexibility and rapid deployment.
IBM Cognos offers comprehensive analytics, robust security, and enterprise-level reporting support. In comparison, Domo emphasizes ease of use and rapid data visualization. A tech buyer might choose IBM for advanced features or Domo for easier deployment and mobile access.
IBM Cognos typically requires a significant upfront setup cost, making it a less budget-friendly option, while Domo offers a more streamlined and economical setup process, highlighting a key financial difference between the two platforms.
IBM Cognos typically requires a significant upfront setup cost, making it a less budget-friendly option, while Domo offers a more streamlined and economical setup process, highlighting a key financial difference between the two platforms.
Domo integrates multiple reporting tools with drag-and-drop ETL for diverse user skills, while Amazon QuickSight offers cloud-native AWS integration with machine learning insights. In comparison, QuickSight is cost-efficient with simple access, though Domo excels in data source connectivity.
Domo has a more complex setup cost compared to Amazon QuickSight, which offers a lower initial investment. The detailed implementation process of Domo contrasts with the straightforward approach seen in Amazon QuickSight's pricing structure.
Domo has a more complex setup cost compared to Amazon QuickSight, which offers a lower initial investment. The detailed implementation process of Domo contrasts with the straightforward approach seen in Amazon QuickSight's pricing structure.
Domo's rapid data integration and user-friendly design cater to non-technical users, enhancing accessibility. In comparison, Palantir Foundry's robust data handling suits larger datasets, offering scalability and versatility for technical users, despite its complexity and higher cost.
Domo excels in ease of use for non-technical users, offering rapid dashboard development and seamless data integration. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere DataStage provides robust data integration and ETL capabilities, better suited for large data volumes and complex transformations, despite its higher cost.
Domo typically has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage comes with higher initial expenses, reflective of its robust enterprise capabilities.
Domo typically has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage comes with higher initial expenses, reflective of its robust enterprise capabilities.
Domo offers ease of use and quick implementation, making it accessible for various skill levels with flexible data handling. In comparison, SAP Analytics Cloud excels in feature integration, providing robust planning and predictive analytics within the SAP ecosystem, appealing to extensive businesses.
Domo's setup cost is noted for its transparency and affordability, whereas SAP Analytics Cloud is recognized for its flexibility and scalability but may entail higher initial expenses.
Domo's setup cost is noted for its transparency and affordability, whereas SAP Analytics Cloud is recognized for its flexibility and scalability but may entail higher initial expenses.
Domo offers extensive data connectors and user-friendly dashboards, ideal for non-technical users seeking real-time updates. In comparison, Qlik Sense provides associative data modeling for complex analysis and rapid dashboard creation, attracting users needing seamless data integration and flexible deployment options.
Domo's setup cost is often seen as higher, while Qlik Sense is noted for its more flexible pricing, providing an advantage for those with budget constraints.
Domo's setup cost is often seen as higher, while Qlik Sense is noted for its more flexible pricing, providing an advantage for those with budget constraints.
Domo offers a comprehensive suite with robust data handling and dashboards, beneficial for varied skill levels. In comparison, Anaplan excels in real-time connected planning and complex modeling. Domo provides flexible deployment, while Anaplan is preferred for large-scale analysis and enterprise integration.
SAP BusinessObjects offers enterprise scalability and integration with SAP systems, ideal for detailed analysis in large organizations. In comparison, Domo provides user-friendly data management and rapid integration, appealing to organizations seeking easy setup and broad access through cloud-based deployment.
SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform often incurs higher setup costs compared to Domo. Domo provides a more cost-effective setup experience.
SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform often incurs higher setup costs compared to Domo. Domo provides a more cost-effective setup experience.
Domo appeals with its simplicity and rapid dashboard creation ideal for diverse user groups. In comparison, Oracle OBIEE excels with robust server capabilities for comprehensive enterprise reporting. Each tool offers unique advantages suited to different organizational needs and data complexities.
Domo offers user-friendly data visualization and a wealth of connectors, perfect for non-technical users handling extensive data tasks. In comparison, Fivetran excels in real-time syncing and robust pipelines for complex transformations, favored for scalable, data-intensive operations despite its higher cost.
Domo streamlines reporting tools into a user-friendly dashboard, ideal for quick onboarding and integration of diverse data sources. In comparison, Oracle Analytics Cloud provides advanced machine learning and predictive analytics, appealing to those seeking sophisticated analytic capabilities and scalable business solutions.
QlikView offers a flexible, interactive development environment with strong ETL capabilities, ideal for those needing powerful data exploration. In comparison, Domo's cloud architecture and extensive connectors make it suitable for seamless integration and ease of use for non-technical users.
QlikView has a setup cost advantage with its flexible pricing structure, whereas Domo presents a higher initial investment. This notable difference in setup costs highlights Domo's potential for scalable enterprise solutions, contrasting with QlikView's budget-friendly appeal.
QlikView has a setup cost advantage with its flexible pricing structure, whereas Domo presents a higher initial investment. This notable difference in setup costs highlights Domo's potential for scalable enterprise solutions, contrasting with QlikView's budget-friendly appeal.
Domo provides extensive data connectors and streamlined dashboards, ideal for non-technical users handling complex ETL tasks. In comparison, Apache Superset's open-source flexibility appeals to those seeking customizable dashboards and cost-effective solutions. Apache offers ease of deployment, while Domo focuses on data integration features.
Domo typically involves higher setup costs due to its comprehensive features, whereas Apache Superset offers a lower setup cost with simplicity and flexibility.
Domo typically involves higher setup costs due to its comprehensive features, whereas Apache Superset offers a lower setup cost with simplicity and flexibility.
Domo facilitates ease of use with versatile data management and visualization tools, appealing to non-tech users. In comparison, Oracle Hyperion provides robust financial analytics suited for enterprises focused on financial reporting, highlighting structured data handling and integration with financial systems.
Domo offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Oracle Hyperion involves higher setup expenses due to its complex implementation process. These differences highlight Domo's affordability against Oracle Hyperion's robust enterprise-level capabilities.
Domo offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Oracle Hyperion involves higher setup expenses due to its complex implementation process. These differences highlight Domo's affordability against Oracle Hyperion's robust enterprise-level capabilities.
Domo provides comprehensive data integration with numerous connectors and Magic ETL for non-technical users. In comparison, ThoughtSpot excels in query-based search and self-service BI features, ideal for users seeking intuitive interfaces and quick ad hoc explorations.
Domo offers a straightforward setup cost, while ThoughtSpot has a more detailed cost structure. The clear distinction lies in Domo's simplicity compared to ThoughtSpot's complexity in setup pricing.
Domo offers a straightforward setup cost, while ThoughtSpot has a more detailed cost structure. The clear distinction lies in Domo's simplicity compared to ThoughtSpot's complexity in setup pricing.
Domo excels in integrating multiple data sources into a unified dashboard with extensive connectors. In comparison, Sisense offers advanced analytics and visualizations with customization options. Domo is flexible in deployment, while Sisense provides quick public cloud deployment and competitive pricing for small-to-medium organizations.
Board integrates with budgeting tools, providing robust planning capabilities. In comparison, Domo offers extensive data visualization and vast data connectivity. Board suits those needing structured deployment and training, while Domo's flexible deployment and advanced analytics appeal to organizations prioritizing rapid implementation and data integration.
Domo excels with rich feature sets and data visualization, appealing to organizations needing complex analytics. In comparison, Sigma, with its cloud-native ease of deployment and efficient support, draws businesses requiring cost-effective, real-time collaboration without compromising essential analytics capabilities.
Domo's setup cost is typically higher due to its robust features, while Sigma offers a more affordable initial setup which can attract budget-conscious users.
Domo's setup cost is typically higher due to its robust features, while Sigma offers a more affordable initial setup which can attract budget-conscious users.
Domo is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and rapid integration, making it ideal for immediate deployment. In comparison, Workday Prism Analytics excels in data handling and integrates seamlessly with Workday applications, suiting enterprises with complex data needs.
Domo has flexible setup costs, while Workday Prism Analytics requires a higher upfront investment. Domo caters to businesses looking for adaptability, whereas Workday Prism Analytics targets enterprises with significant budgets for comprehensive analytics solutions.
Domo has flexible setup costs, while Workday Prism Analytics requires a higher upfront investment. Domo caters to businesses looking for adaptability, whereas Workday Prism Analytics targets enterprises with significant budgets for comprehensive analytics solutions.
Adaptive Insights excels in financial planning, making it ideal for finance professionals seeking strong budgeting capabilities. In comparison, Domo offers extensive data visualization and integration, appealing to those needing advanced analytics through interactive dashboards and a diverse data connection.
Pentaho attracts tech buyers seeking robust ETL capabilities and open-source flexibility at an affordable cost. In comparison, Domo's ease of adoption and seamless integration appeals to organizations prioritizing quick setup, despite its higher cost and focus on comprehensive data visualization and integration.
Pentaho Business Analytics involves an upfront setup cost, while Domo offers a more streamlined setup process with lower initial expenses, highlighting a clear difference in the approach and cost of onboarding users.
Pentaho Business Analytics involves an upfront setup cost, while Domo offers a more streamlined setup process with lower initial expenses, highlighting a clear difference in the approach and cost of onboarding users.
Domo excels in ETL capabilities and complex integrations, catering to diverse user skill levels. In comparison, Zoho Analytics focuses on user-friendly dashboards and API integration. Domo provides flexible cloud deployments, while Zoho Analytics offers cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers.
Domo offers a higher setup cost compared to Zoho Analytics, making Zoho an appealing option for budget-conscious users. Domo, however, provides more advanced setup features justifying its higher initial investment.
Domo offers a higher setup cost compared to Zoho Analytics, making Zoho an appealing option for budget-conscious users. Domo, however, provides more advanced setup features justifying its higher initial investment.
Domo offers robust data connectors and Magic ETL for versatile data aggregation and visualization, appealing to diverse technical users. In comparison, Pyramid Analytics excels in analytical capabilities with strong support for DAX queries, making it ideal for in-depth analysis and reporting.
Domo's setup cost involves a straightforward pricing approach, whereas Pyramid Analytics requires a more customized setup fee, highlighting significant differences in their pricing structures.
Domo's setup cost involves a straightforward pricing approach, whereas Pyramid Analytics requires a more customized setup fee, highlighting significant differences in their pricing structures.
Julius AI helps users manage tasks efficiently with valuable features such as task automation and data analytics. It offers intuitive design and strong integration capabilities. However, it could improve on customization options to better fit diverse business requirements and enhance overall functionality.
Omni addresses varied tech needs with flexible integration and reliable performance. Users appreciate its extensive customization and intuitive features. Some suggest improvements in documentation clarity and error handling. Omni's adaptability remains a key asset for teams seeking cohesive solutions across different operational landscapes.
Domo excels in real-time analytics and dashboarding, appealing to those seeking data-driven insights. In comparison, Windward Core specializes in automated document generation and integration, ideal for complex reporting tasks, attracting organizations prioritizing robust document management over advanced analytic tools.
Domo offers a straightforward setup cost, while Windward Core provides a flexible pricing model tailored to specific needs, highlighting key differences in cost structures.
Domo offers a straightforward setup cost, while Windward Core provides a flexible pricing model tailored to specific needs, highlighting key differences in cost structures.
Domo offers flexibility and scalability with intuitive dashboards and real-time analytics, ideal for businesses needing adaptability. In comparison, Oracle BI Cloud Service provides advanced reporting and predictive analytics, suited for enterprises requiring detailed solutions, despite more complexity and higher setup costs.
Infor dEPM excels in pricing, offering strong financial planning and budgeting tools. In comparison, Domo provides dynamic data visualization through extensive data integration capabilities. Infor dEPM's efficient enterprise deployment and support attract financial oversight, while Domo's cloud-based scalability appeals to organizations needing rapid implementation.
TARGIT is one of the largest Business Intelligence providers within Gartner's Magic Quadrant. With over 18 years of experience in the BI and Analytics segment and over 5000 customers globally, TARGIT has been consistently considered as a top player in the industry. TARGIT is a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner, recognized for strong applications development. We offer companies a user-friendly decision platform that combines intelligent dashboards, self-service analytics, and dynamic reporting.
Databox serves as a dynamic tool for compiling key business metrics into visual dashboards. Users find its data integration capabilities and customization options highly valuable, enhancing decision-making efficiency. Some suggest enhancements for improved data syncing speed and expanded analytics features to heighten functionality.
InetSoft Style Report Enterprise is an edition of Style Intelligence that focuses on enterprise reporting, generating pixel-perfect production reports and delivering interactive reports in a zero-client, web environment. It also includes the same data intelligence platform as Style Intelligence, which solves data management challenges such as connecting to and transforming data from disparate sources.
