

QlikView and Domo compete in the business intelligence and data visualization category. QlikView appears to have an upper hand in fast data analysis and deployment, while Domo shines in user-friendly data integration and extensive connectors.
Features: QlikView is known for its patented AQL technology enabling flexible data analysis without OLAP cubes. Its in-memory processing ensures high-speed performance, and the built-in ETL engine provides noteworthy flexibility. Domo offers a wide range of data connectors, an intuitive drag-and-drop interface, and a strong capacity for data integration and visualization.
Room for Improvement: QlikView could enhance its self-service capabilities and reduce its dependence on IT support, and its scalability is hindered by RAM limitations. Meanwhile, the Domo pricing model might need improvements, and its ETL processes can be more efficient. Users also report concerns about its high costs and limited visualization support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView supports on-premises deployment with robust technical support and active community resources; however, reliance on partner quality can affect customer service. Domo offers flexibility with cloud and hybrid deployments and is praised for general support services, though some users report issues with complex tiered services.
Pricing and ROI: QlikView is perceived as costly, with pricing increasing with user numbers, yet the reported ROI is high due to rapid deployment and strong analytics. Domo also presents a costly investment, offering scalable pricing options. Although both solutions provide significant value, QlikView often delivers faster returns through its efficient data-driven decision-making process.
If you're actually using Domo at a very limited case and you're being charged $20,000, we've seen ROI there, but once it goes really high, you really need to check your metrics and check your profit.
The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.
No matter how complex the problem is, it can be taken care of by the support team.
They were quite professional and in around three to five working days, they had identified where they suspected there was an issue and I was able to fix it.
It's very easy to get technical support from Domo.
I would rate the customer support a solid 10.
I am totally satisfied with technical support from Qlik.
The fact that you're able to easily identify the pipelines or flows that have errors, and it notifies you when you're building a pipeline where you can run previews and tell where to fix issues, is helpful.
When fetching files larger than 100 MB from SFTP or any other portal, Domo becomes slow due to the heavy file size.
Everything comes under the same umbrella and it's pretty user-friendly.
If you want better performance with a larger volume of data, you can simply add an additional server.
In recent years, I haven't had such cases. It's quite stable and I don't have any reservations on its stability.
In terms of overall stability of the platform, it's very stable.
During that time, we faced issues from the project side as Domo was not visible in our portal.
End users require a license to run their own reports and dashboards, which are fairly expensive.
Some technical aspects such as Beast Mode calculation could be improved in Domo, as it would provide more clarity and help in giving insights to clients or customer business team requirements.
One of the areas where we've had frustrations with Domo is the aesthetics. The aesthetics are quite limited compared to other BI tools such as Tableau and Power BI.
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.
It would be beneficial to have AI or ML features in QlikView.
Domo's pricing is high compared to other BI tools, and it is costly.
For long-time users, it can become expensive, but the trade-off is access to the entire platform instead of licensing different components separately.
They quoted approximately one dollar per KB.
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.
I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.
App Studio is valuable because it allows all the customization we needed; we can decode it, with the view and grid which are all I need, drill-downs, and everything can be done the way I need it.
None of the other tools provide the kind of support that enables chatting and working on the same item simultaneously.
Domo has positively impacted my organization by giving everyone the ability to see different data cards and make decisions quicker without relying on BI.
The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.
Building metrics using simple language, similar to what you have in Excel, is what I have found most valuable in QlikView.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Domo | 6.0% |
| QlikView | 4.0% |
| Other | 90.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 73 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 76 |
Domo provides self-service BI, enabling users to generate reports without needing a data warehouse. Its cloud-based nature enhances accessibility and performance, while offering customizable dashboards for data-driven decision-making.
Domo stands out for its robust data integration, featuring Magic ETL to streamline processes. Its AI-driven insights, extensive data connectors, and collaboration tools promote secure sharing and analytical proficiency. Although users note room for improvement in visualization, pricing, and data integration, its capabilities in generating executive dashboards and unified analytics remain prominent. Performance and user experience enhancements are desired, including improved support for large data volumes and richer data transformation tools.
What are the key features of Domo?In industries like finance, marketing, project management, and retail, organizations use Domo for crafting executive dashboards, integrating data sources, and conducting advanced analytics. Its capabilities allow them to transform data into insightful dashboards, aiding in performance tracking and actionable insights.
QlikView enhances data analysis with its associative data model and rapid in-memory processing, providing dynamic dashboards and robust visualization, while efficient data integration allows connections to multiple sources.
QlikView offers powerful analytics and insight generation capabilities through its integration with Salesforce, enabling real-time sales data access. Its customizable dashboards are complemented by scripting for complex calculations and QVDs for performance optimization. Designed to be user-friendly, it supports ETL processes and diverse data browsing, allowing users to interact with data intuitively. However, there is room for improving licensing complexities, scalability, and self-service functionality. Additional enhancements are desired in visualization, integration with Qlik Sense, and predictive analytics support.
What are QlikView's key features?QlikView finds use in building business intelligence dashboards across sectors, integrating with Salesforce for analytics, supporting financial planning, and tracking sales. Its intuitive interface aids manufacturing companies in KPI monitoring and informs commercial decisions. The tool enhances reporting, ETL processes, and diverse data source integration, facilitating offline data access.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.