QlikView and Domo compete in the business intelligence and data visualization category. QlikView appears to have an upper hand in fast data analysis and deployment, while Domo shines in user-friendly data integration and extensive connectors.
Features: QlikView is known for its patented AQL technology enabling flexible data analysis without OLAP cubes. Its in-memory processing ensures high-speed performance, and the built-in ETL engine provides noteworthy flexibility. Domo offers a wide range of data connectors, an intuitive drag-and-drop interface, and a strong capacity for data integration and visualization.
Room for Improvement: QlikView could enhance its self-service capabilities and reduce its dependence on IT support, and its scalability is hindered by RAM limitations. Meanwhile, the Domo pricing model might need improvements, and its ETL processes can be more efficient. Users also report concerns about its high costs and limited visualization support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView supports on-premises deployment with robust technical support and active community resources; however, reliance on partner quality can affect customer service. Domo offers flexibility with cloud and hybrid deployments and is praised for general support services, though some users report issues with complex tiered services.
Pricing and ROI: QlikView is perceived as costly, with pricing increasing with user numbers, yet the reported ROI is high due to rapid deployment and strong analytics. Domo also presents a costly investment, offering scalable pricing options. Although both solutions provide significant value, QlikView often delivers faster returns through its efficient data-driven decision-making process.
The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.
While they eventually provide the correct answers, their support for smaller customers could be improved.
I would rate the customer support a solid 10.
Sigma, which is written for Snowflake, scales more easily than Domo.
End users require a license to run their own reports and dashboards, which are fairly expensive.
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.
Domo is expensive compared to other solutions.
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.
I have been using it for four years and have been able to extract the information I need from it.
The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| QlikView | 4.0% |
| Domo | 10.5% |
| Other | 85.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 73 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 75 |
Domo is a cloud-based, mobile-first BI platform that helps companies drive more value from their data by helping organizations better integrate, interpret and use data to drive timely decision making and action across the business. The Domo platform enhances existing data warehouse and BI tools and allows users to build custom apps, automate data pipelines, and make data science accessible for anyone through automated insights that can be shared with internal or external stakeholders.
Find more information on The Business Cloud Here.
QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
