Cisco Secure Access surpasses its competitors by offering robust end-to-end network security, seamless user experiences across all devices, and advanced threat intelligence integration that provides proactive defenses and comprehensive visibility for enhanced security management.
The pricing is an issue. It is expensive compared to other firewalls on the market.
Our monthly fee is around R3000.
The pricing is an issue. It is expensive compared to other firewalls on the market.
Our monthly fee is around R3000.
Clients use Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls for perimeter protection, securing network traffic, setting up VPNs, blocking applications, enhancing datacenter security, managing traffic between cloud and on-premises environments, and integrating SD-WAN and security features. They appreciate stability, advanced threat protection, application-aware identification, and machine learning for real-time attack prevention.
Annually, the licensing costs are too much.
The licensing is annual, and there aren't any additional fees on top of that.
Annually, the licensing costs are too much.
The licensing is annual, and there aren't any additional fees on top of that.
FortiSASE impresses with integration efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access offers comprehensive protection and scalability. FortiSASE is ideal for cost-conscious buyers, while Cisco Secure Access suits those requiring a broad feature set despite higher initial costs.
The price of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be reduced, it is expensive.
The solution is expensive.
The price of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be reduced, it is expensive.
The solution is expensive.
Palo Alto Networks DNS Security enhances security by blocking malware and protecting against command and control traffic. It ensures DNS filtering, safeguarding mobile devices and servers. Integrated DNS filtering, anti-hacking, and machine learning improve management. On-premise options offer control. Users suggest price adjustments and feature enhancements for market competitiveness.
There is an annual license for the solution and I am satisfied with the pricing.
It is not an expensive solution.
There is an annual license for the solution and I am satisfied with the pricing.
It is not an expensive solution.
It costs about 8 to 10 thousand dollars per year for 500 users, standard licensing fees included.
Sangfor is cheaper than competing vendors.
It costs about 8 to 10 thousand dollars per year for 500 users, standard licensing fees included.
Sangfor is cheaper than competing vendors.
Licensing fees are billed on an annual basis.
The price of the license of this solution is high.
Licensing fees are billed on an annual basis.
The price of the license of this solution is high.
It is appropriately priced for what they're doing for us. Considering the protection provided, I feel their pricing is spot-on.
It is appropriately priced for what they're doing for us. Considering the protection provided, I feel their pricing is spot-on.
It might be in the range of $15 to $20 a month per user. It's not that expensive for us as we don't have a lot of personnel using it.
It might be in the range of $15 to $20 a month per user. It's not that expensive for us as we don't have a lot of personnel using it.
The cost could be lower, though it is not currently prohibitive for larger companies.
The pricing is good. It's a substantial cost, but they've held their prices over the years, which has been good.
The cost could be lower, though it is not currently prohibitive for larger companies.
The pricing is good. It's a substantial cost, but they've held their prices over the years, which has been good.
Provided the features Akamai SPS Threat Avert provides, it is bound to be expensive.
Provided the features Akamai SPS Threat Avert provides, it is bound to be expensive.
This program is very, very expensive.
It is expensive. Licensing is on a yearly basis. You need to do the support subscription.
This program is very, very expensive.
It is expensive. Licensing is on a yearly basis. You need to do the support subscription.
There are costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. They should provide better licensing options.
There are costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. They should provide better licensing options.
The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment.
The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment.
Users need to pay a yearly license for three, five, seven, or ten years based on their requirements.
Users need to pay a yearly license for three, five, seven, or ten years based on their requirements.
I rate the product pricing a five or six out of ten on a scale of one to ten.
The solution’s pricing is cheaper than any other solution.
I rate the product pricing a five or six out of ten on a scale of one to ten.
The solution’s pricing is cheaper than any other solution.
The solution's pricing is totally reasonable compared to trying to do it yourself.
The solution's pricing is totally reasonable compared to trying to do it yourself.