Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is iboss?

Get the report
Helped 866,286 peers since 2012

Featured iboss reviews

iboss mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of iboss in the Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) category stands at 1.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
iboss1.8%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks15.3%
Netskope12.1%
Other70.8%
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

PeerResearch reports based on iboss reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySecure Access Service Edge (SASE)Aug 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 30, 2025Download
Comparisoniboss vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange PlatformAug 30, 2025Download
Comparisoniboss vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto NetworksAug 30, 2025Download
Comparisoniboss vs NetskopeAug 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Cisco Umbrella4.4N/A97%121 interviewsAdd to research
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks4.215.3%92%64 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business1237
Midsize Enterprise730
Large Enterprise2391
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Retailer
4%
Construction Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
University
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Non Profit
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Media Company
3%
Performing Arts
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%

Compare iboss with alternative products

Learn more about iboss

iboss customers

Related questions

 
iboss Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Head of Cybersecurity at SES Water4.5We primarily use iboss for web filtering and protection. Its simplicity and customer service are highlights. The intuitive interface and ChatGPT Risk Protection feature impressed us, though the reporting function needs improvement as it lacks intuitiveness.
Managing Director4.5I use iboss for web filtering across six sites for about 22,000 users. It's intuitive and significantly improved security with a single pane of glass console. Although it requires manual VPN connections, it remains cost-effective and responsive to feedback.
Works4.0We use iboss for both remote and office users, valuing its security policies, reliable policy updates, and effective node connection management. However, improved internet security and better support are needed. We've used iboss from the start and find it beneficial.
Vice President of Security and Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees3.5We chose iboss for its SASE and ZTNA features and have 80,000 users on the platform. Its flexible deployment and excellent pricing meet our needs despite lacking some security features compared to competitors like Zscaler.
Educational Technology Coordinator at a performing arts with 201-500 employees4.5I primarily use iboss for simpler filtering in our K12 environment. The cloud-based console eases management, enhances reporting, and saves costs. While the AI in their Zero Trust platform needs tuning, iboss provides fast support and improved infrastructure, consolidating legacy solutions.
Solution Architect I at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I found iboss to be highly effective for our transition to cloud proxies, with strong features like categorization and inline CASB functionality. Although the zero trust setup was complex, iboss outperformed competitors in simplicity and support for our needs.
Network Administrator at a educational organization with 51-200 employees2.5We initially chose iboss for its unique network-based filtering, ideal for our BYOD school environment. However, issues with device recognition, rising costs, poor customer service, and missing features like a self-harm module led us to switch to Securly.
Information Security Expert at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees5.0We utilize iboss for URL filtering, AI initiatives, and forensic analysis. Its features are reliable, improving security without user disruption. While improvements in endpoint monitoring would be beneficial, iboss met our expectations, outperforming previous solutions. The deployment integrates well with our Microsoft environment.