Top 10 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

44 reviews
85% willing to recommend

Top BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity surpasses its competitors by utilizing advanced AI-driven threat prevention, offering predictive security solutions, and delivering unparalleled protection against both known and unknown cyber threats, ensuring robust security measures for businesses worldwide.

BlackBerry Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with BlackBerry, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon excels with advanced EDR capabilities and AI-driven protection, ideal for detailed threat intelligence needs. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity focuses on AI and ML-based detection, offering a lightweight design, suitable for protecting against zero-day threats with fewer resources.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon offers a higher upfront setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance, which features a more affordable initial investment. This pricing difference highlights CrowdStrike Falcon's more robust security features.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance emphasizes AI-driven malware detection and efficiency, appealing to those needing zero-day threat protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products, ideal for users valuing centralized management and advanced threat protection.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity has a lower setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers additional setup features at a higher cost. This difference highlights varied budget considerations between BlackBerry Cylance’s affordability and Microsoft Defender’s comprehensive i...

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in automated threat response and rollback capabilities, appealing to tech buyers seeking comprehensive threat handling. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers proactive detection with minimal resource use, ideal for those prioritizing efficiency and AI-driven protection.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete features a straightforward setup cost, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity provides a scalable and predictable cost structure. SentinelOne offers a simple deployment process, contrasting with BlackBerry Cylance's emphasis on customized configurations.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance provides AI-driven, lightweight endpoint protection, ideal for minimizing system resource usage. In comparison, Cortex XDR integrates with firewalls and network devices for enhanced threat detection and analysis, suitable for those needing comprehensive correlation of data across multiple networks and endpoints.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity features a straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks may involve higher setup expenses suited for complex environments.

View comparison

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity features a straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks may involve higher setup expenses suited for complex environments.

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven malware protection with minimal system impact, appealing to users with ongoing threat protection needs. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient provides comprehensive security with strong VPN capabilities, suitable for seamless integration with Fortinet infrastructure.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers competitive setup costs, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is often praised for lower initial expenses. This clear distinction highlights BlackBerry's advanced features compared to the budget-friendly approach of Fortinet.

View comparison

Pricing

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

BlackBerry Cylance excels in AI-driven threat detection and cost-effectiveness, appealing to cost-conscious businesses seeking proactive security. In comparison, HP Wolf Security’s hardware-enforced protection and innovative endpoint solutions attract enterprises desiring long-term security benefits and comprehensive device-level coverage.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security Report

Pricing

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity requires a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly HP Wolf Security. While both solutions aim at effective cybersecurity, their initial cost can be a decisive factor for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security excels in central management and flexibility, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive oversight. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is valued for lightweight design and advanced machine learning, making it ideal for seamless protection against zero-day threats.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform incurs a higher setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security provides comprehensive features, including antivirus and multi-OS support, appealing to those needing extensive integration. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance focuses on AI-driven threat detection, attracting buyers seeking lightweight, proactive protection without the reliance on system resources or signature-based methods.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security incurs higher setup costs than BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security incurs higher setup costs than BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business

4.0 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business

4.0 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is ideal for enterprises needing centralized management with antivirus and deployment features. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance provides efficient AI-driven threat detection. Buyers might appreciate Kaspersky for its comprehensive suite, while Cylance appeals with its lightweight agent and advanced AI.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a straightforward setup cost, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers a more varied pricing structure. The difference in cost flexibility can impact the decision between these cybersecurity solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in comprehensive threat protection, offering scalability and virtual patching. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI for threat detection with a focus on low resource consumption, appealing to those seeking efficient zero-day attack protection.

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a straightforward setup process that is streamlined and cost-effective, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity provides comprehensive initial support with potentially higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive configuration options.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 20 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Threat Intelligence Platforms