BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

BlackBerry and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.3, while WithSecure is ranked #47 with an average rating of 7.3. BlackBerry holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

2,953 Views
2,658 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,468 Views
1,468 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the cybersecurity category. BlackBerry Cylance appears to have the upper hand due to its AI-driven malware detection and efficient resource management, appealing to businesses needing proactive protection.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven malware detection, centralized management, and low system resource impact, providing proactive endpoint protection. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection emphasizes vulnerability management, useful dashboards, and an intuitive portal, enhancing user experience and comprehensive protection.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance users highlight challenges with false positives, a need for more detailed threat information, and desire for an improved interface and additional platform support. WithSecure could optimize patch management and reduce high RAM usage, and expand integration with third-party solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance offers flexible deployment options with mixed reviews on technical support. WithSecure provides responsive support, especially through managed providers, and is praised for easy setup and configuration, offering a favorable deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance's pricing may seem high, but users find value in its protection and low resource demand. WithSecure offers competitive pricing, particularly for bulk licenses. Both solutions deliver strong ROI, though Cylance's costs might concern price-sensitive buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

31st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

47th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.1%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	0.8%
Other	98.1%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices."

"I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part."

"You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard."

"I've found the AI engine in CylancePROTECT to be particularly effective for technology and in preventing unknown threats."

"Blackberry Protect offers endpoint protection. It's easy to deploy. It's scalable and stable."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution is very quick at easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and the server."

"Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

Cons

"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."

"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."

"rom my experience interacting with the primary or the central administrative console, it's quite complex. You would need a fair bit of technical experience to set it up, implement and maintain it. That would be one area for improvement."

"While you are working, you are finding these things that were supposed to be waived have come back to being blocked. That's frustrating."

"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."

"Making the dashboards a bit modern to make them easier to search would also be helpful."

"CylancePROTECT could be improved in its technical support and communication."

"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is."

"We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user."

"CylancePROTECT is an affordable solution."

"The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten."

"The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"We went through a third party initially to do the renewal, but we won't be renewing, we will move on to something else."

"It is expensive, but not unreasonable."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The price is comparable."

"The product has average pricing."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 30% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

September 2025

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

August 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?

Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.

What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?

Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

BlackBerry

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

September 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.