Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

BlackBerry and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while WithSecure is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.5. BlackBerry holds a 1.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...
Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews
  • 2,960 Views
  • 2,664 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 1,518 Views
  • 1,503 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance and WithSecure Elements compete in the cybersecurity category. BlackBerry Cylance seems to have the upper hand due to its strong AI-driven endpoint protection and minimal resource consumption.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers powerful AI and machine learning for malware detection and blocking, including zero-day threats. It employs a lightweight agent that minimizes system resource usage and functions efficiently without daily signature updates. A centralized dashboard enhances management efficiency. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, on the other hand, provides robust application and script monitoring features such as AMSI and DeepGuard, offering comprehensive endpoint security and excelling in vulnerability detection and patch management.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance users report frequent false positives and desire a more user-friendly management console, enhanced reporting capabilities, and reduced pricing. Additionally, better integration, configuration support, and historical data functionalities are sought. WithSecure Elements users wish for improved resource consumption, more real-time responses, better third-party integration, and enhanced technical partner support, especially in regions like the Middle East.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance supports a variety of deployment options, including on-premises and cloud environments such as public, private, and hybrid clouds. Their customer service receives mixed reviews, with medium-rated technical support due to responsiveness issues. WithSecure Elements primarily offers deployment on-premises and in private and public clouds. Its customer service is rated excellent, with responsive and efficient technical support.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is considered affordable but somewhat high-priced compared to competitors, with a cost usually scaling with the number of endpoints for flexibility. Users experience mixed ROI but value the security offered. WithSecure Elements is seen as cost-effective, particularly when licenses are bought in bulk, with scalability providing further savings. Its ROI is noted as substantial, ensuring efficiency and security management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
43rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity1.2%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection1.0%
Other97.8%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry - PeerSpot reviewer
Sooraj Makkancherrry
Security Operations Manager at Philips
Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.
Read full review
Mark Feldman - PeerSpot reviewer
Mark Feldman
IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH
Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Endpoints are protected in real-time without the need of a centralized server."
"It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions."
"CylancePROTECT is a fairly decent antivirus."
"Even if an endpoint loses connection to the Internet, I know that endpoint is protected against 99.99% of the threats in the wild today."
"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."
"The platform's most valuable features are the malware detection capabilities."
"It provides good insight into the programs, applications, or websites that may need attention."
"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros
"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."
"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."
"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."
"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."
"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."
"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."
"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."
 

Cons

"It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated."
"The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information."
"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."
"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."
"They could improve on the false positives, reporting and whitelisting features."
"The initial deployment was quite complicated."
"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."
"Enhancing the product's detection rates and streamlining the user interface for easier management in daily operations would be beneficial improvements."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons
"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."
"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."
"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."
"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."
"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."
"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."
"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."
"The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The tool is not that expensive."
"The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten."
"Currently, we have competitive pricing for Cylance, which is affordable enough to consider."
"We went through a third party initially to do the renewal, but we won't be renewing, we will move on to something else."
"CylancePROTECT's pricing is reasonable, at about €18 per user, per year."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice
"The price is comparable."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."
"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."
"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."
"The product has average pricing."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Comms Service Provider
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business33
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?
It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?
The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immedi...
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The notifications and patch management features are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 8% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 7% of the time
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 7% of the time
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 6% of the time
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 17% of the time
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 8% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 3% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
December 2025
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reportDownload BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
December 2025
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report
 

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business
 

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?
  • AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
  • Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
  • Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
  • CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
  • Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.
What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?
  • High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
  • Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
  • Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
  • Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry
WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
December 2025
Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.