Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Teams Logo

Microsoft Teams Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

What is Microsoft Teams?

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

Get the Microsoft Teams Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams, TeamViewer Business, Atlassian Confluence and more!
Microsoft Teams is the #1 ranked solution in top Enterprise Social Software and #4 ranked solution in top Virtual Meetings solutions. PeerSpot users give Microsoft Teams an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Microsoft Teams is most commonly compared to TeamViewer Business: Microsoft Teams vs TeamViewer Business. Microsoft Teams is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 65% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 23% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Teams
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Featured Microsoft Teams reviews

Read more reviews

Microsoft Teams mindshare

Product category:
Virtual Meetings
As of January 2026, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams in the Virtual Meetings category stands at 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Teams2.7%
Zoom Workplace Business9.4%
Webex7.6%
Other80.3%
Virtual Meetings

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft Teams reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryVirtual MeetingsJan 8, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 8, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Teams vs Zoom Workplace BusinessJan 8, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Teams vs WebexJan 8, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Teams vs TeamViewer BusinessJan 8, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
TeamViewer Business4.34.4%92%99 interviewsAdd to research
Atlassian Confluence4.1N/A90%107 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Oct 12, 2025

Valuable Features

Microsoft Teams' features such as seamless communication through chat and video calling, integration with Office 365, and collaboration tools like SharePoint and OneDrive are highly valued. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface for organizing remote meetings, sharing files, and utilizing persistent chat. The platform's streamlined integration with existing Microsoft tools, comprehensive document management, and high-quality audio and video conferencing facilitate effective teamwork. The ease of access on mobile devices further enhances its appeal.
  • "The biggest benefit from Microsoft Teams is its simplicity to use the tools and the facility to search on the conversation or on the transcript solution."
  • "Microsoft Teams is a communication platform that enables one-on-one communication as well as group communication, and it is convenient with recordings and AI tools such as automatic transcripts."
  • "I have participated in meetings with up to 500 people during all-team meetings, and it worked without any issues."

Room for Improvement

Users of Microsoft Teams have expressed challenges related to file management, integration capabilities, interface intuitiveness, and stability. Complaints include slow file uploads due to complex authorization levels, inefficient calendar and task management, and limited collaboration features compared to platforms like Zoom. There are frustrations with high memory usage, limited AI capabilities, frequent stability issues, and complicated user interface navigation. Users also seek better integration with external tools, more intuitive identity management, and an improved search feature.
  • "Sometimes it is quite complicated to install Microsoft Teams if we want to integrate it with SharePoint or anything else."
  • "I think stability definitely needs to be improved in Microsoft Teams to be more convenient for users."
  • "The application crashing in Microsoft Teams affected productivity. If we could minimize that, productivity would increase."

ROI

Companies see substantial time savings and flexibility with Microsoft Teams, with many highlighting improved collaboration. Most report significant returns, including cost savings on travel and enhanced remote work capabilities during the pandemic. Some users integrate Teams with other Microsoft services, contributing positively to investment returns. A few users notice no productivity increase or find it comparable to alternatives like Webex. Overall, the tool is deemed valuable, though some find the monetary investment high.

Pricing

Microsoft Teams pricing varies with user requirements and package options. Enterprise buyers typically find the solution economical when bundled with Microsoft 365, offering cost savings by including other Microsoft tools. Licensing is often included in Office packages with options for additional security features at an extra cost. Fees are per user, with competitive pricing compared to standalone alternatives. Some organizations additionally benefit from subsidized rates or free usage in educational institutions, enhancing affordability.
  • "I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party companies worldwide."
  • "I don't think the solution is as expensive as big Webex licenses. It doesn't usually offer one-on-one licenses, so it's hard to compare. It's more expensive than the Google equivalent, but you can't replace Microsoft Teams with Google's offering."
  • "The solution's pricing is average."

Popular Use Cases

Microsoft Teams is used primarily for communication, project collaboration, and virtual meetings. It facilitates file sharing, chat, video conferencing, and integrates with Microsoft 365 tools like SharePoint and Outlook. Organizations employ it for team management, document sharing, onboarding, training, external communication, and internal coordination. Teams enable seamless work across different locations with tools such as Lists, Plans, and Tasks, improving efficiency in remote work environments.

Service and Support

Many users rely on internal support teams for Microsoft Teams, rarely engaging directly with Microsoft. For those who do, experiences vary. Some praise the support as responsive and knowledgeable, while others find delays frustrating, especially via standard channels. Premium support receives positive feedback, offering dedicated assistance. Feedback on general services indicates that support can be inconsistent, with users noting both timely responses and extended delays for resolution. Enhancement in support quality is desired by many.

Deployment

Microsoft Teams' initial setup is mostly viewed as straightforward and user-friendly. Many found it quick and simple to deploy, especially when integrated with Office 365. However, some experienced slight challenges, such as activating accounts or ensuring compatibility across devices. The deployment timeline varied significantly, with smaller deployments completed rapidly, while larger organizations required more time to align everything. Familiarity with Microsoft's ecosystem appears to assist in easing the setup process.

Scalability

Microsoft Teams is recognized for its scalability across various user bases. Organizations have successfully integrated thousands of users, highlighting its capability to handle diverse needs smoothly. Users commend its seamless performance even with expanded usage, noting effective integration and ease of user addition. Challenges arise occasionally, such as with license management and channel limitations, but they are generally manageable. The scalability contributes to its widespread adoption in large companies and educational institutions.

Stability

Microsoft Teams demonstrates consistent stability, with most users experiencing minimal issues. Some report challenges like screen sharing disruptions, occasional crashes, or connection losses, often tied to internet reliability rather than the app itself. Users frequently rate its stability between 8 to 10 out of 10, suggesting high overall satisfaction. Few mention the need for improvements due to synchronization or status display problems, indicating areas where some face minor setbacks.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Microsoft Teams Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business57
Midsize Enterprise41
Large Enterprise61
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business75
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise225
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Construction Company
6%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Performing Arts
5%
University
4%
Insurance Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%

Compare Microsoft Teams with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Microsoft Teams

We do business in 170 countries and are made up of 114,000 passionate employees dedicated to fulfilling our mission of helping you and your organization achieve more.

Microsoft Teams was previously known as MS Teams.

Microsoft Teams customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly

Related questions

  • 24
How does Microsoft Teams compare with Altassian Confluence?
  • 24
How can you review a Microsoft Teams history?
  • 25
When evaluating Virtual Meetings, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 77
What are the tools you recommend to support teleworking?
  • 30
Is there a video conferencing platform that can have a plug-in on a website?
  • 25
Why is Virtual Meetings important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Virtual Meetings
Enterprise Social Software

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
TeamViewer Business vs Microsoft Teams Logo
TeamViewer Business vs Microsoft Teams
Atlassian Confluence vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Atlassian Confluence vs Microsoft Teams
Zoom Workplace Business vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Zoom Workplace Business vs Microsoft Teams
Bitrix24 vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Bitrix24 vs Microsoft Teams
Slack Business - Enterprise vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Slack Business - Enterprise vs Microsoft Teams
Skype for Business vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Skype for Business vs Microsoft Teams
Jive vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Jive vs Microsoft Teams
Yammer vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Yammer vs Microsoft Teams
Symphony vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Symphony vs Microsoft Teams
Cisco TelePresence vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Cisco TelePresence vs Microsoft Teams
GoToMeeting vs Microsoft Teams Logo
GoToMeeting vs Microsoft Teams
HCL Connections vs Microsoft Teams Logo
HCL Connections vs Microsoft Teams
Chatter vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Chatter vs Microsoft Teams
GoToWebinar vs Microsoft Teams Logo
GoToWebinar vs Microsoft Teams
Blackboard Collaborate vs Microsoft Teams Logo
Blackboard Collaborate vs Microsoft Teams
See all alternatives
 
Microsoft Teams Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank3.5I've used Microsoft Teams daily since 2018 for meetings and task management; it's convenient but glitchy, with recent updates causing confusion. Support and stability vary, and separating licensing from Office has made budgeting harder.
Senior Software Engineer at Endava3.5I've used Microsoft Teams for years; it's convenient for communication and video conferencing, though occasionally unstable. It works well for large meetings, integrates with Office 365, but lacks Slack’s flexibility with external system integrations.
Manager at NetEase4.5I've used Microsoft Teams for five years to collaborate with clients, valuing its ease of use and chat search features, though integration—especially with Copilot and SharePoint—can be complex and could be improved.
Master in Cyber Security at Ganpat University4.0I used Microsoft Teams for nearly two years and found it user-friendly with great UI and video quality, though occasional app crashes affected productivity slightly; setup was easy, and I’d rate it an 8 out of 10.
Data Scientist Capability owner at BP5.0I've used Microsoft Teams for over a decade for meetings, collaboration, and transcription, with useful integrations like Workday, though language nuances affect accuracy; avatars, transcription in regional languages, and overall responsiveness could be improved.
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates5.0I've used Microsoft Teams for 4–5 years mainly for team meetings, chats, and document collaboration; it's stable, scalable, integrates well with Microsoft 365, though slightly expensive and occasionally slow, I still rate it 10/10.
CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited4.0I use Microsoft Teams for presentations and collaboration because of its seamless integration with Office 365 and unique features like session recording to OneDrive. Improvements needed include AI for transcripts, visibility during presentations, and better integration with other products.
System Egineer at Degroof-Petercam3.5I use Microsoft Teams mainly for chatting and meetings, finding the persistent chat feature helpful, but limited integration due to on-premise systems restricts functionality. Overall, it's stable and scalable but offers no productivity improvement over Webex.