We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Yammer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to record sessions on Teams, which is a beneficial feature."
"The solution helps with collaborative communication. You can use it to chat and book calls. You can even set the status as away. It also has a transcript feature integrated."
"You can easily integrate with other applications quite easily."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to have remote meetings with customers and colleagues."
"Everything is valuable, such as the chats, the calls, and the file sharing."
"Microsoft Teams is a friendly and easy-to-install solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that I can attach files in any format."
"I like the product's screen share feature since we can explain things to the users at the other end using it. The solution helps me to establish a virtual connection with my team."
"It was a stable solution...It was a highly scalable solution considering it was used in a very big company."
"The posting features are valuable."
"The initial setup was simple and straightforward."
"Yammer brings in the most relevant posts to the users."
"Groups is the most valuable feature in Yammer."
"Valuable features include the integration with Microsoft Office and the fact that it is in the cloud. Also, it's quite easy to use."
"Its most valuable features are the storyline and communities."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"Microsoft Teams should include better integration of the multi-viewer webinar-type system."
"Screen sharing sometimes causes the solution to crash."
"The remote control needs some improvement."
"The chat option in the Teams tab is not very helpful. We don't use it very often. There is also an expiration on the recordings. It would be useful to not have a time limit."
"Lacking in more complex hierarchies for files and teams."
"There could be performance spikes and better reliability. We saw a lot of stability issues."
"It would be better if Microsoft Teams can link us to the internet on the screen sharing mode during the meeting."
"The security needs improvement, as well as the ability to back up private chats."
"The interface is clunky and could be improved."
"The product seems to just add to the complexity of using existing tools."
"Yammer should include more integrations."
"I would like to see a fancier user interface. That is one of the weak points of Yammer."
"Microsoft should work on templating and provide some built-in templates so that the changes can automatically roll out to all the configured communities."
"Sometimes, we lose access to the solution for unknown reasons."
"Yammer should be able to integrate with Microsoft products, such as Outlook."
"Although Microsoft is working on it, having a centralized network instead of creating multiple networks based on a domain would help businesses with multiple companies or child companies."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while Yammer is ranked 4th in Enterprise Social Software with 60 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Yammer is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Yammer writes "Ease of use and a familiar user interface". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Yammer is most compared with Workplace by Facebook, SAP Jam, Chatter, Jive and Interact Intranet. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Yammer report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
