Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Teams vs Webex comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Microsoft Teams enhances collaboration and efficiency, integrating with tools like Word and SharePoint, though some see no added benefit.
Sentiment score
5.9
Users appreciate Webex for its security and efficiency, though ROI remains uncertain for some, especially regarding financial benefits.
We chose Webex for its security.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Users have mixed experiences with Microsoft's support, ranging from satisfactory responsiveness to challenges in reaching assistance, often relying on internal teams.
Sentiment score
7.1
Webex is praised for responsive and effective support, despite occasional delays and reseller challenges, ensuring positive customer service perception.
Microsoft support is excellent, offering instantaneous assistance through either robo support or live personnel.
I have logged tickets for Office 365 and received responses within 24 hours, depending on the severity.
Webex supports our daily communication and collaboration needs, but not extensively, as all support is via our service center.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Teams offers robust scalability and seamless integration, effectively supporting diverse organizational needs and large remote meetings.
Sentiment score
7.2
Webex is scalable for large organizations, though some users experience challenges with very large deployments or network stability.
Microsoft Teams is scalable, and I have successfully conducted sessions with close to forty people without significant issues.
Webex is very scalable, and I do not think that our organization has ever reached its limit.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Teams is generally stable, with minor issues mainly caused by network conditions, maintaining high reliability for daily use.
Sentiment score
7.5
Webex is stable and reliable, with minor audio issues often due to network problems, and occasional performance inconsistencies.
Microsoft Teams is stable once the setup is completed properly.
I would rate its stability as ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Teams users seek improved UI, stability, integration, and AI features, alongside better file sharing and customization options.
Users desire better platform integration, simplified usability, improved performance, enhanced features, and superior support for Webex.
Microsoft could take into consideration specific use cases with some restrictions, such as improving the compatibility between cloud and non-cloud setup.
Microsoft Teams could be improved through more synchronization with other platforms like Calendly and Gmail.
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations.
Zoom has a big advantage in simplicity, especially for the other side to connect to a session.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Teams offers competitive pricing within Office 365 bundles but can be costly with additional security features for large user bases.
Webex pricing is subscription-based, often costly compared to competitors, requiring evaluation based on features and budget.
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack.
Microsoft Teams is economical when purchased as part of an Office 365 bundle.
Webex is expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Teams enhances productivity through seamless Office 365 integration, clear communication, flexible access, and user-friendly collaboration tools.
Webex enhances communication with features like screen sharing, secure meetings, integration with Outlook, scalability, and user-friendly interface.
Microsoft Teams is also noted for its compliance with GDPR and SOC 2, ensuring data security and compliance.
The platform is user-friendly and has positively impacted our communication, allowing us to communicate with people from different countries and cities in real time.
It serves everything in one place and improves communication within organizations.
The number one reason we chose Webex was the security features.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
169
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (1st)
Webex
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
125
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 3.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 15.1%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce, which is currently limited.
Wajid Khattak - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, enables remote meetings, and saves time and money
We deployed the product in our headquarters and connected our four plants. It enables us to meet remotely. We use the tool for remote meetings. I work in the manufacturing sector The product is easy to use. We are very comfortable with it. The video call features are compatible with different…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I have no information about the cost as these are subsidized when procured by companies. Getting a home version cheaper or free would be a better option so students or college-goers can utilize the...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
I am unable to determine which features of Microsoft Teams are the most valuable because we do not have full capabilities due to our Exchange server being on-premise and OneDrive not being authoriz...
What do you like most about Webex?
Webex improved our overall team collaboration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?
Webex is expensive. If it weren't that expensive, we would probably use it for all our telecommunication needs, not just for telemedicine.
What needs improvement with Webex?
I would appreciate improvements in communication stability and performance. Sometimes we experience a poor communication stream, but I am uncertain whether it is due to the internet link or somethi...
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
Cisco Spark
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.