Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Teams vs Webex comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Microsoft Teams enhances collaboration and efficiency, saving time, reducing costs, and proving valuable during remote work.
Sentiment score
5.9
Organizations find it challenging to quantify Webex ROI but value its benefits, security, and confirmed positive investment outcomes.
We chose Webex for its security.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Many prefer internal support as Microsoft's assistance varies in responsiveness and effectiveness, influenced by support tier and call volume.
Sentiment score
7.1
Webex customer service is highly rated, but technical support feedback is mixed, ranging from poor to outstanding responsiveness.
Microsoft support is excellent, offering instantaneous assistance through either robo support or live personnel.
I have logged tickets for Office 365 and received responses within 24 hours, depending on the severity.
Webex supports our daily communication and collaboration needs, but not extensively, as all support is via our service center.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Teams scales efficiently for varied user sizes, with seamless integration and some potential file storage challenges.
Sentiment score
7.2
Webex is scalable, adaptable for varying group sizes, with excellent support, accommodating diverse corporate environments effectively.
Microsoft Teams is scalable, and I have successfully conducted sessions with close to forty people without significant issues.
Webex is very scalable, and I do not think that our organization has ever reached its limit.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Teams is stable with minor network-related issues, receiving high ratings for reliability and robust cross-device functionality.
Sentiment score
7.5
Webex is stable and reliable, with few minor issues often linked to user networks rather than the platform.
Microsoft Teams is stable once the setup is completed properly.
I would rate its stability as ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Teams requires enhanced integration, improved performance, better UI, security, and new AI features for optimal user experience.
Webex requires interface improvements, better integration, enhanced performance, more features, and competitive pricing to address user concerns.
Microsoft could take into consideration specific use cases with some restrictions, such as improving the compatibility between cloud and non-cloud setup.
Microsoft Teams could be improved through more synchronization with other platforms like Calendly and Gmail.
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations.
Zoom has a big advantage in simplicity, especially for the other side to connect to a session.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Teams is cost-effective, often bundled with Office 365, offering flexible, affordable pricing with some geographical and feature-based variations.
Webex pricing varies by licensing, with high fees deterring small businesses despite volume discounts and limited free options.
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack.
Microsoft Teams is economical when purchased as part of an Office 365 bundle.
Webex is expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Teams excels in communication and collaboration with robust features, Office 365 integration, and flexible, user-friendly access.
Webex offers reliable, secure video conferencing with excellent features like screen sharing, Outlook integration, and seamless Cisco product compatibility.
Microsoft Teams is also noted for its compliance with GDPR and SOC 2, ensuring data security and compliance.
The platform is user-friendly and has positively impacted our communication, allowing us to communicate with people from different countries and cities in real time.
It serves everything in one place and improves communication within organizations.
The number one reason we chose Webex was the security features.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
169
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (1st)
Webex
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
125
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 3.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 16.2%, up from 15.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce ( /vendors/salesforce ), which is currently limited.
Wajid Khattak - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, enables remote meetings, and saves time and money
We deployed the product in our headquarters and connected our four plants. It enables us to meet remotely. We use the tool for remote meetings. I work in the manufacturing sector The product is easy to use. We are very comfortable with it. The video call features are compatible with different…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
40%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack ( /...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations. Users often don't know they have messages from another company unless they...
What do you like most about Webex?
Webex improved our overall team collaboration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?
Webex is expensive. If it weren't that expensive, we would probably use it for all our telecommunication needs, not just for telemedicine.
What needs improvement with Webex?
Usability needs improvement. Webex is more complex compared to Zoom ( /products/zoom-reviews ). Zoom ( /products/zoom-reviews ) has a big advantage in simplicity, especially for the other side to c...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

MS Teams
Cisco Spark
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.