Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo

Top 10 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Alternatives

Vendor: Qualys
4.6 out of 5
Badge Leader
Start review

Top Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, and Tanium. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive visibility into all assets for effective risk management through real-time tracking, automatic inventory updates, and seamless integration with other tools, ensuring superior protection and efficient operations.

Qualys Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Qualys, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint security with advanced EDR that minimizes performance impact. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers detailed asset visibility and bundling value. Buyers choose Falcon for threat detection or Qualys for comprehensive asset management and competitive pricing.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has minimal setup costs, focusing on rapid deployment, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more complex initial setup, highlighting differences in deployment strategies and initial cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has minimal setup costs, focusing on rapid deployment, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more complex initial setup, highlighting differences in deployment strategies and initial cost structures.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace excels in detecting threats autonomously with its AI-driven capabilities, enhancing network visibility with swift anomaly detection. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management enables efficient asset management through comprehensive inventory features and dynamic tagging, enhancing security posture across varied environments.
Download Darktrace vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Darktrace has lower setup costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, Qualys offers more comprehensive setup features, appealing to users seeking extensive integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace has lower setup costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, Qualys offers more comprehensive setup features, appealing to users seeking extensive integration capabilities.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Tanium offers significant real-time data processing and endpoint management, ideal for organizations seeking quick visibility and control. In comparison, Qualys provides comprehensive vulnerability management and scalability, ideal for larger environments needing extensive asset coverage with quicker, simpler deployment.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tanium Report
Tanium requires significant upfront investment, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium requires significant upfront investment, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has a more budget-friendly setup.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Orca Security offers comprehensive cloud-specific features and real-time insights, appealing to those prioritizing visibility and operational efficiency. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides deep asset visibility and detailed vulnerability insights, attractive for businesses seeking robust integrated asset management.
Download Orca Security vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Orca Security's setup involves initial investments, whereas Qualys offers a more straightforward setup process. Orca may require more initial resources compared to Qualys, which could make Qualys appealing for those seeking easier implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Orca Security's setup involves initial investments, whereas Qualys offers a more straightforward setup process. Orca may require more initial resources compared to Qualys, which could make Qualys appealing for those seeking easier implementation.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
JFrog Xray offers deep scanning and integration with CI/CD pipelines, making it ideal for developer-focused environments. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in asset visibility and inventory management, appealing to businesses requiring extensive asset security across IT environments.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
JFrog Xray offers a straightforward setup process though it may incur higher initial costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management's more complex installation but potentially lower setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
JFrog Xray offers a straightforward setup process though it may incur higher initial costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management's more complex installation but potentially lower setup fees.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne is ideal for small to medium enterprises due to its remote management and automation features. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management suits enterprises needing comprehensive asset discovery and robust security for hardware and software visibility, providing extensive insights to enhance cybersecurity postures.
Download NinjaOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
NinjaOne offers competitive setup costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which tends to have higher initial setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers competitive setup costs compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which tends to have higher initial setup fees.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers robust anomaly detection and integration with Jira, ideal for public cloud deployment. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in asset management and comprehensive tool integration, benefiting hybrid environments. Tech buyers should consider their specific needs and deployment preferences.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides an extensive configuration requiring higher initial investment, making Lacework's simplicity a notable differentiator.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides an extensive configuration requiring higher initial investment, making Lacework's simplicity a notable differentiator.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Armis secures its position with extensive visibility and ease of deployment, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing quick implementation. In comparison, Qualys attracts those seeking strong feature integration and scanning capabilities, ideal for complex environments despite a more involved deployment process.
Download Armis vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Armis incurs minimal setup costs that ease implementation, while Qualys often involves higher setup expenses, impacting budget planning.
View comparison
Pricing
Armis incurs minimal setup costs that ease implementation, while Qualys often involves higher setup expenses, impacting budget planning.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Amazon Inspector offers competitive pricing and seamless AWS integration, appealing to cloud-centric buyers. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides broader deployment flexibility and comprehensive features, attracting organizations with complex infrastructures seeking in-depth insights across diverse environments.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Amazon Inspector features a simple setup with minimal upfront costs, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires a more involved setup process with potentially higher initial expenses, reflecting a difference in integration and cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon Inspector features a simple setup with minimal upfront costs, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires a more involved setup process with potentially higher initial expenses, reflecting a difference in integration and cost structure.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
Atera excels in remote management and automation, ideal for operational efficiency and cost-saving scalability for startups. In comparison, Qualys offers comprehensive cybersecurity management and asset visibility, making it suitable for larger enterprises prioritizing extensive security coverage with detailed vulnerability reports.
Download Atera vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Atera's setup cost is minimal and straightforward, whereas Qualys involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a cost disparity between simplicity and comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Atera's setup cost is minimal and straightforward, whereas Qualys involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a cost disparity between simplicity and comprehensive features.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Mandiant Advantage excels in threat intelligence and response, appealing to organizations seeking proactive security. In comparison, Qualys emphasizes asset inventory and continuous monitoring, ideal for those prioritizing visibility and vulnerability management. Mandiant's premium pricing contrasts with Qualys' competitive ROI-focused approach.
Download Mandiant Advantage vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Mandiant Advantage has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, contrasting with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Mandiant Advantage has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, contrasting with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which may involve higher initial expenses.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Axonius
4.2 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Axonius
4.2 out of 5
Axonius attracts users with seamless integration and quick deployment, enhancing asset visibility effortlessly. In comparison, Qualys captivates with extensive security features and robust vulnerability management, despite a steeper learning curve, offering long-term risk management for those prioritizing in-depth security insights.
Download Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Axonius has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly for new adopters, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive features justifying its higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Axonius has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly for new adopters, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive features justifying its higher initial expenses.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Bitsight
4.3 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Bitsight
4.3 out of 5
Bitsight excels in pricing and support, appealing to cost-conscious organizations with its reliable risk management tools. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management attracts those seeking comprehensive asset features and efficient service, justifying a higher initial investment through long-term value.
Download Bitsight vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Bitsight offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference for companies considering these cybersecurity asset management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitsight offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference for companies considering these cybersecurity asset management solutions.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Morphisec excels in silent endpoint security integration with Microsoft Defender for seamless threat management. In comparison, Qualys offers detailed asset and vulnerability management, ideal for large organizations. A tech buyer might choose Morphisec for its zero-day threat protection or Qualys for comprehensive asset inventory.
Download Morphisec vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Morphisec offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost implications, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a more complex initialization that may lead to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Morphisec offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost implications, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a more complex initialization that may lead to higher initial expenses.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Cortex Xpanse
4.4 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Cortex Xpanse
4.4 out of 5
Cortex Xpanse is ideal for those seeking cost-effectiveness and simplicity with its focus on asset discovery and monitoring. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management attracts users needing detailed analysis and robust integration despite a more complex deployment process.
Download Cortex Xpanse vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Cortex Xpanse has a higher setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, emphasizing investment differences.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex Xpanse has a higher setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, emphasizing investment differences.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management excels in pricing, support, and ease of deployment, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive asset management features, attracting organizations seeking detailed security insights despite higher initial investment and a more complex deployment process.
Download Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management offers a simpler setup process compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which requires a more detailed setup effort. This distinction highlights Microsoft's ease of implementation as a key differentiator.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management offers a simpler setup process compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which requires a more detailed setup effort. This distinction highlights Microsoft's ease of implementation as a key differentiator.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CyCognito
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CyCognito
1 out of 5
CyCognito offers greater pricing satisfaction with automated surface management and faster deployment. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides superior feature depth with comprehensive asset discovery and extensive integrations, making it appealing to buyers prioritizing feature richness over cost efficiency.
CyCognito offers a simpler setup process, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management may have higher initial costs. CyCognito emphasizes a more streamlined approach compared to the potentially more complex integration with Qualys.
View comparison
Pricing
CyCognito offers a simpler setup process, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management may have higher initial costs. CyCognito emphasizes a more streamlined approach compared to the potentially more complex integration with Qualys.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
runZero
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
runZero
1 out of 5
runZero offers competitive pricing and straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers desiring fast implementation and customer support. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides extensive integration and scalability, ideal for those prioritizing advanced features and long-term value despite higher initial costs.
runZero has a straightforward setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves more complex initial expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
runZero has a straightforward setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves more complex initial expenses.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Censys Attack Surface Management
1 out of 5
Censys excels in rapid deployment and user-friendly interfaces, providing real-time visibility at a favorable cost. In comparison, Qualys focuses on comprehensive security insights and advanced threat intelligence, justifying its higher cost with a robust feature set and extensive support.
Censys Attack Surface Management offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management may involve higher setup expenses with additional requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Censys Attack Surface Management offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management may involve higher setup expenses with additional requirements.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Sevco
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Sevco
1 out of 5
Sevco offers ease of use with seamless IT integration and responsive support, appealing to those seeking quick deployment. In comparison, Qualys provides a comprehensive feature set with robust vulnerability management, justifying its investment through extensive security insights and scanning capabilities.
Sevco offers a lower setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which may result in different budget considerations for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Sevco offers a lower setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which may result in different budget considerations for organizations.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
SBOM Studio
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
SBOM Studio
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in comprehensive security assessments and seamless integration, appealing to buyers seeking broad security features. In comparison, SBOM Studio focuses on software supply chain transparency, attracting those prioritizing software management and compliance.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a straightforward setup process, while SBOM Studio requires a more involved initial configuration. The ease of setup distinctly favors Qualys for quick implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a straightforward setup process, while SBOM Studio requires a more involved initial configuration. The ease of setup distinctly favors Qualys for quick implementation.

Related categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
Vulnerability Management
Patch Management