Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo

Top 10 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Alternatives

Vendor: Qualys
4.6 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wiz, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive asset visibility, continuous monitoring, automated workflows, and detailed vulnerability assessments, ensuring organizations maintain a robust security posture across all digital environments.

Qualys Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Qualys, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat detection and endpoint visibility, appealing to those seeking strong EDR capabilities. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management focuses on detailed asset management for complex networks, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing asset discovery and vulnerability tracking.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more affordable initial investment.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Wiz efficiently contextualizes security issues with intuitive navigation, ideal for quick risk prioritization in cloud settings. In comparison, Qualys CSAM emphasizes robust inventory management across environments. Buyers might choose Wiz for rapid visibility, while Qualys appeals with competitive pricing and integration capabilities.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Wiz Report
Wiz requires minimal setup costs, appealing to businesses seeking quick deployment, whereas Qualys incurs higher upfront expenses, reflecting its robust initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Wiz requires minimal setup costs, appealing to businesses seeking quick deployment, whereas Qualys incurs higher upfront expenses, reflecting its robust initial configuration.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security impresses with real-time detection, automated remediation, and useful integrations, appealing to those seeking efficiency and scalability. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides robust asset management, catering to enterprises needing comprehensive visibility and cost-effective solutions.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management presents a more complex fee structure.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management presents a more complex fee structure.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace excels in AI-driven threat detection and response, making it appealing for those focusing on advanced threat analytics. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is favored for asset discovery and integration flexibility, ideal for comprehensive asset management and seamless monitoring across environments.
Download Darktrace vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Darktrace has a higher setup cost with comprehensive integration features, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more cost-effective setup, making it suitable for businesses with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace has a higher setup cost with comprehensive integration features, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more cost-effective setup, making it suitable for businesses with budget constraints.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium is favored for its rapid data retrieval and detailed network visibility, appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in vulnerability detection and data integration, attracting those seeking in-depth security insights and a cloud-native deployment model.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tanium Report
Tanium's setup cost is high for larger enterprises, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more affordable entry point for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium's setup cost is high for larger enterprises, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more affordable entry point for smaller businesses.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Orca Security leverages SideScanning for cloud visibility, excelling in seamless integration and streamlined operations. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management emphasizes asset inventory with dynamic tagging. Orca's agentless approach offers quick ROI, while Qualys provides flexible pricing for larger enterprises.
Download Orca Security vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Orca Security's setup cost is straightforward, offering an easy integration process, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management entails a more complex setup with potential extra costs. Factors like these distinguish their approach to initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Orca Security's setup cost is straightforward, offering an easy integration process, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management entails a more complex setup with potential extra costs. Factors like these distinguish their approach to initial deployment.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Tenable offers comprehensive environment visibility and cloud integration ease, suitable for larger enterprises needing long-term value. In comparison, Qualys excels in detailed asset management and offers competitive pricing, ideal for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions with real-time visibility and automated scanning.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Tenable Vulnerability Management's setup cost is often considered reasonable with flexible pricing options, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management tends to have a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Vulnerability Management's setup cost is often considered reasonable with flexible pricing options, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management tends to have a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
JFrog Xray excels with real-time vulnerability scanning within CI/CD pipelines, ideal for DevOps. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers extensive asset discovery and assessment, suitable for comprehensive security needs. JFrog provides easy DevOps integration, while Qualys ensures cloud scalability for complex environments.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
JFrog Xray typically involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
JFrog Xray typically involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in remote monitoring with script deployment and patch management, suitable for SMBs. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity focuses on asset discovery and vulnerability management, appealing to larger enterprises seeking advanced security. Both offer different strengths, catering to diverse business needs.
Download NinjaOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
NinjaOne offers a competitive setup cost with immediate deployment benefits, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides a comprehensive security-focused setup.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers a competitive setup cost with immediate deployment benefits, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides a comprehensive security-focused setup.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management excels in integration and risk prioritization. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management focuses on comprehensive asset discovery and management. Tech buyers may choose Defender for seamless Microsoft integration or Qualys for extensive asset intelligence and proactive management.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management incurs moderate setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management incurs moderate setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in anomaly detection and compliance management, offering insightful reports and effective cloud security management. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides strong asset lifecycle management and vulnerability detection, making it suitable for large-scale environments with comprehensive discovery and risk prioritization capabilities.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP typically involves a larger setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a key distinction in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP typically involves a larger setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a key distinction in their pricing strategies.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Armis focuses on real-time device visibility, appealing to users prioritizing threat detection and integration flexibility. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management targets users needing extensive vulnerability management, appealing with robust support and functionality that could justify higher initial costs for long-term security benefits.
Download Armis vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Armis has minimal setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Armis has minimal setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires a higher initial investment.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.2 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.2 out of 5
Amazon Inspector appeals to businesses prioritizing cost-effective solutions with seamless AWS integration. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management attracts enterprises seeking detailed asset visibility and comprehensive security features, providing robust support and flexibility across diverse environments.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Amazon Inspector requires a lower initial setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses looking to streamline startup expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon Inspector requires a lower initial setup cost compared to Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses looking to streamline startup expenditures.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Axonius
4.3 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Axonius
4.3 out of 5
Axonius attracts tech buyers with its seamless integration and asset inventory capabilities, highlighting cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Qualys appeals to those prioritizing extensive security analysis and vulnerability management, offering comprehensive features despite a steeper learning curve and higher initial costs.
Download Axonius vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Axonius has a straightforward setup cost compared to the more structured pricing of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management.
View comparison
Pricing
Axonius has a straightforward setup cost compared to the more structured pricing of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Mandiant Advantage excels with intelligence-driven threat detection and real-time insights. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management emphasizes comprehensive asset visibility and continuous monitoring. Mandiant's simplicity attracts threat-focused users, while Qualys's robust features and flexible deployment appeal to those seeking extensive security enforcement.
Download Mandiant Advantage vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Mandiant Advantage requires a higher setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more cost-effective initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Mandiant Advantage requires a higher setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more cost-effective initial implementation.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
Atera offers a broad remote management suite with automation tools ideal for cost-effective management. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides in-depth asset visibility and vulnerability management, suitable for enterprises prioritizing robust security. Atera simplifies pricing, while Qualys excels in comprehensive security features.
Download Atera vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Atera features a straightforward setup with minimal associated costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a higher initial setup investment. Atera is ideal for users seeking cost-effective onboarding, compared to Qualys' more substantial setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Atera features a straightforward setup with minimal associated costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a higher initial setup investment. Atera is ideal for users seeking cost-effective onboarding, compared to Qualys' more substantial setup requirements.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Bitsight
4.3 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Bitsight
4.3 out of 5
Bitsight appeals to those seeking cost-effective external cyber risk evaluation with straightforward integration. In comparison, Qualys attracts buyers desiring robust asset management and vulnerability scanning, valuing cloud deployment efficiency and comprehensive IT system assessments.
Download Bitsight vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Bitsight requires a high initial setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more affordable setup, making Qualys a cost-effective alternative to Bitsight.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitsight requires a high initial setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more affordable setup, making Qualys a cost-effective alternative to Bitsight.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Morphisec ensures endpoint security without affecting performance, ideal for zero-day threat prevention. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in asset visibility and management. Morphisec’s seamless operation contrasts with Qualys' detailed asset inventory, offering distinct advantages for tech buyers.
Download Morphisec vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Morphisec offers a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management presents a more complex pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Morphisec offers a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management presents a more complex pricing model.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive inventory management and real-time visibility, ideal for complex IT environments. In comparison, Vicarius vRx's patchless protection and automation features cater to organizations prioritizing efficient remediation and seamless vulnerability management.
Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Vicarius vRx Report
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a substantial initial setup cost, whereas Vicarius vRx offers lower setup expenses, highlighting a distinct cost advantage for organizations considering Vicarius vRx compared to Qualys.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a substantial initial setup cost, whereas Vicarius vRx offers lower setup expenses, highlighting a distinct cost advantage for organizations considering Vicarius vRx compared to Qualys.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Cortex Xpanse
4.4 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Cortex Xpanse
4.4 out of 5
Cortex Xpanse excels in automation, reducing manual processes and offering smooth deployment. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides extensive integrations and comprehensive security solutions, appealing to those seeking flexibility and tailored setups despite the complexity in deployment.
Download Cortex Xpanse vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Cortex Xpanse requires a more significant setup investment, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a lower-cost setup option, highlighting distinct cost implications for businesses considering asset management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex Xpanse requires a more significant setup investment, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a lower-cost setup option, highlighting distinct cost implications for businesses considering asset management solutions.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, offering simplicity for existing users. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides detailed inventory capabilities, appealing to organizations needing granular control and extensive asset visibility for comprehensive cybersecurity management.
Download Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management involves a straightforward setup without extra costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management may require higher initial setup fees. Qualys offers more comprehensive asset management capabilities compared to Microsoft's focus on ...
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management involves a straightforward setup without extra costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management may require higher initial setup fees. Qualys offers more comprehensive asset management capabilities compared to Microsoft's focus on ...
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
IONIX
4.5 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
IONIX
4.5 out of 5
IONIX offers intuitive asset discovery and seamless integration, appealing to organizations valuing ease of use and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides advanced vulnerability detection and real-time threat intelligence, making it ideal for enterprises seeking comprehensive security and robust threat management capabilities.
Download IONIX vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
IONIX setup costs are generally lower, providing a budget-friendly option with competitive features, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves higher setup costs, reflecting its comprehensive security capabilities and in-depth asset management tools.
View comparison
Pricing
IONIX setup costs are generally lower, providing a budget-friendly option with competitive features, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves higher setup costs, reflecting its comprehensive security capabilities and in-depth asset management tools.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CyCognito
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
CyCognito
1 out of 5
CyCognito excels in external attack surface management and asset visibility, offering quick deployment and lower costs. In comparison, Qualys provides a comprehensive suite with strong integration within its Cloud Platform, requiring a higher investment but delivering extensive functionality for broader security needs.
CyCognito's initial setup cost is known to be more straightforward, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management often involves higher initial fees but provides an extensive range of features.
View comparison
Pricing
CyCognito's initial setup cost is known to be more straightforward, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management often involves higher initial fees but provides an extensive range of features.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
runZero
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
runZero
1 out of 5
runZero attracts tech buyers with affordable pricing and efficient customer support. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers enhanced functionality with its integration into a broader suite. runZero's ease of use stands out, while Qualys appeals to those needing comprehensive security features.
runZero offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has a higher setup investment due to advanced features and integrations.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
runZero offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has a higher setup investment due to advanced features and integrations.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Censys Attack Surface Management
1 out of 5
Censys Attack Surface Management emphasizes ease of deployment and customer service, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management caters to those desiring detailed feature integrations and comprehensive asset management, offering a robust security solution that justifies its higher price through extensive benefits.
Censys Attack Surface Management has a minimal setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves higher initial investment, highlighting cost efficiency in Censys compared to the extensive features of Qualys.
View comparison
Pricing
Censys Attack Surface Management has a minimal setup cost, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves higher initial investment, highlighting cost efficiency in Censys compared to the extensive features of Qualys.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Surface Command
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Surface Command
1 out of 5
Surface Command appeals to tech buyers with its competitive pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, favored for its comprehensive features, offers detailed guidance and documentation, providing in-depth security insights for a higher long-term ROI despite a complex setup.
Surface Command offers a straightforward setup process, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires more extensive initial configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Surface Command offers a straightforward setup process, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires more extensive initial configurations.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Group-IB ASM
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Group-IB ASM
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a comprehensive pricing structure and robust vulnerability management, appealing to organizations seeking wide asset coverage. In comparison, Group-IB ASM emphasizes advanced threat management and analytics, attracting companies focused on superior threat detection despite higher initial costs.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires initial investment, whereas Group-IB ASM offers a more flexible cost structure. Qualys provides a clearer cost advantage due to its transparent setup fees compared to Group-IB's customizable pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management requires initial investment, whereas Group-IB ASM offers a more flexible cost structure. Qualys provides a clearer cost advantage due to its transparent setup fees compared to Group-IB's customizable pricing model.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Sevco
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Sevco
1 out of 5
Sevco offers straightforward asset management with quick deployment and real-time visibility, making it ideal for organizations seeking simplicity and lower costs. In comparison, Qualys appeals to enterprises with its comprehensive feature set, including advanced vulnerability management and compliance tools, despite its complex deployment.
Sevco has low upfront setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more comprehensive setup plan involving higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sevco has low upfront setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a more comprehensive setup plan involving higher initial expenses.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
ThreatAware
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
ThreatAware
1 out of 5
ThreatAware excels in ease of deployment and customer service, appealing to those seeking simplicity and efficiency. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management attracts enterprises with extensive features and advanced compliance tools, offering long-term ROI despite a higher setup cost.
ThreatAware offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has a more complex setup process that may incur higher costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatAware offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has a more complex setup process that may incur higher costs.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
SBOM Studio
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
SBOM Studio
1 out of 5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management delivers extensive IT asset inventory and pricing advantages. In comparison, SBOM Studio focuses on software component analysis and risk management. Qualys integrates with broad IT frameworks, whereas SBOM Studio specializes in ROI through software dependency risk mitigation.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a higher setup cost compared to SBOM Studio's more affordable setup, illustrating a significant pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a higher setup cost compared to SBOM Studio's more affordable setup, illustrating a significant pricing difference.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Logo
Snow Risk Monitor
1 out of 5
Qualys offers strong network scanning and efficient pricing, making it ideal for asset discovery. In comparison, Snow Risk Monitor excels in risk evaluation with robust compliance features, appealing to organizations prioritizing risk management despite potentially higher costs and complex deployment.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a straightforward setup with associated costs, while Snow Risk Monitor has a more complex installation process that might entail higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a straightforward setup with associated costs, while Snow Risk Monitor has a more complex installation process that might entail higher initial expenses.

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Patch Management
Attack Surface Management (ASM)