Cymulate vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Cymulate and Qualys are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. Cymulate is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6, while Qualys is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.1. Cymulate holds a 2.9% mindshare in ASM, compared to Qualys’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cymulate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Cymulate

Read 6 Cymulate reviews

3,803 Views
647 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 24 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

2,505 Views
827 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cymulate

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Cymulate and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management compete in the cybersecurity solutions category, each offering distinct advantages. Cymulate has the upper hand with its intuitive platform, strong support, and competitive pricing, appealing to organizations seeking quick and effective security insights.

Features: Cymulate provides threat simulation, ransomware assessment, and security posture management for actionable security improvements. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive asset discovery, vulnerability management, and continuous monitoring, focusing on asset details and robust management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Cymulate could enhance its integration capabilities and asset discovery accuracy to increase overall efficiency. Scalability in larger organizations is also an area for growth. Qualys could improve its initial deployment complexity, streamline its interface, and offer more transparent pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cymulate excels in rapid deployment and consistent customer service, ideal for organizations requiring fast implementation. Qualys, while providing dependable customer service, entails a longer deployment due to its complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Cymulate presents competitive pricing with quick ROI, catering to cost-sensitive businesses aiming for rapid security insights. Qualys offers a higher initial cost but potentially greater ROI for extensive feature utilization, targeting organizations prioritizing comprehensive asset management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cymulate vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cymulate vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cymulate

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (10th), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (1st), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (2nd)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

3rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (8th), Patch Management (5th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Software Supply Chain Security (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Cymulate is 2.9%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 4.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	4.4%
Cymulate	2.9%
Other	92.7%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

Ondrej Kováč

Solution Engineer at Exclusive Networks Czechia

Advanced cybersecurity solution for attack based vulnerability mng. and upskill platform for SOC.

While Cymulate's technology shows great promise and delivers excellent results, their approach to positioning the solution appears to overlap with other companies like Tenable, making them both direct and indirect competitors. Cymulate must refine their messaging and manage expectations effectively. In my experience, they need to be more attentive internally and mindful of potential negative impacts on customers. They exhibit a high degree of flexibility, which can result in sudden changes without adequate alerting. Communicating with them via phone for business matters can be challenging. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cymulate's technology level at eight, but their business level at four out of ten.

Read full review

Nicki Møller

Information Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enables automation and quick access to necessary information

One of the significant challenges Qualys is discovery, which I know Microsoft excels at. I can't recall how well Qualys performs this function; it seems I might be missing some details. However, if there's one key aspect to focus on, it's discovery—the ability to identify assets that you are not aware of, even when you can see they are present. Understanding what those assets are is crucial. With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system. The features within Qualys are limited to what they have developed. Sometimes a complete overview is needed to push to a Power BI dashboard, Splunk, ServiceNow, or other platforms. The export process is incredibly challenging. We needed a developer to write a hundred-line Python script that would loop over certain assets due to export limitations. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could improve its integration capabilities. While it generates substantial data, correlating it with other data sources can be challenging. The export process is difficult, and pre-built integrations with other tools could be enhanced for better process implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With Cymulate, the best features are the capacity to test the EDR or malware, anti-malware solution."

"Cymulate has positively impacted our organization by helping us to take care of the efficacy and reviewing the policies and configuration."

"The reporting capabilities are very good."

"The security validation feature helps my organization in assessing our security posture."

"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."

"Cymulate is easy to set up, install, and configure."

"Authorized and unauthorized software visibility is the best feature for me. It helps me understand security controls on our network and where we lack visibility. With a single security tool, we are able to get an extensive list."

"I recommend Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management due to its superior asset information collection capabilities, including comprehensive hardware and software inventorying."

"Qualys CSAM is valuable for providing end-of-life and end-of-sale information. It gives me visibility into the number of products or hardware items that are end-of-life."

"The main thing I appreciate about Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is the cloud environment while tracking software and zero-day vulnerability risk, alongside asset discovery and tagging, as well as attack surface management."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

"Our favorite features are the tagging and the ability to quickly find assets in the portal."

"The most valuable features of Qualys CSAM include the ability to manage authorized and unauthorized applications efficiently. This feature helps in validating applications and maintaining a secure environment."

"My favourite feature of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is its ability to target missing software."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"The way Cymulate works for EDR could be improved, as it drops payload and requires action from the EDR console for remediation, which can block the whole process of Cymulate execution."

"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."

"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."

"The cost can be quite high, and it impacts scalability as more simulations require additional expenses."

"I will be honest, we have it, but in the last year, I didn't maintain the system until a month ago."

"We have had some trouble with the agents."

"From the user experience perspective, we need a simpler interface and reduced complexity in certain features, particularly with the Qualys Query Language."

"All required features are available in Qualys CSAM. However, it would be helpful if Qualys CSAM started incorporating AI models. An inclusion of threat details for AI and LLM-related risks would be beneficial."

"They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword. They should fix that."

"Currently, whenever the agent is running, it consumes over ten percent of my CPU, indicating that CPU consumption is another area Qualys needs to address."

"The main aspect that needs improvement is the user interface, which should be more intuitive."

"The UI needs improvement as it can become overwhelming after prolonged use."

"Qualys could improve by enhancing its dynamic tagging and role-based access control features, and by refining its user interface for a more intuitive and efficient user experience."

"Qualys CSAM is not super responsive, and there can be delays sometimes, especially with the network passive sensor. You might see duplicate objects which eventually disappear but it takes time. If that can be done faster, it will be great."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cymulate's services are expensive."

"The product is affordable."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cymulate?

The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cymulate?

I don't currently recall the specific pricing details as I last reviewed them two years ago. I initially thought it would be more expensive, but I found it reasonable because you can purchase modul...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cymulate?

The way Cymulate works for EDR could be improved, as it drops payload and requires action from the EDR console for remediation, which can block the whole process of Cymulate execution. They should ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

We are currently using a cheaper solution, and I sometimes get the feeling that our solution is less stable. When things go wrong and you don't get the expected results, it becomes very difficult t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

We are using Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for daily activities such as identifying new assets through network scanning and agent-based scanning for newly provisioned assets. When any new a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentera vs Cymulate

Compared 33% of the time

Picus Security vs Cymulate

Compared 21% of the time

XM Cyber vs Cymulate

Compared 13% of the time

AttackIQ vs Cymulate

Compared 6% of the time

SafeBreach vs Cymulate

Compared 6% of the time

More Cymulate Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 11% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 9% of the time

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 8% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cymulate

October 2025

Download Cymulate product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

September 2025

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

For companies that want to manage their security posture against the evolving threat landscape: Cymulate SaaS-based Extended Security Posture Management (XSPM) deploys within an hour, enabling security professionals to continuously challenge, validate and optimize their cyber-security posture end-to-end across the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The platform provides out-of-the-box, expert and threat intelligence-led risk assessments that are simple to deploy and use for all maturity levels, and constantly updated. It also provides an open framework to create and automate red and purple teaming by generating penetration scenarious and advanced attack campaigns tailored to their unique environments and security politices. Cymulate allowes professionals to manage, know and control their dynamic environment.

Cymulate

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides advanced real-time asset visibility, dynamic tagging, and External Attack Surface Management. It streamlines asset discovery and management using cloud agents and IP-based scanning, enhancing risk management and software lifecycle tracking.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a comprehensive solution for managing asset inventories and tracking software lifecycle states. It facilitates network visibility and supports zero-day vulnerability solutions, enhancing security posture through efficient monitoring. Users benefit from its cloud-based interface, which provides in-depth asset configurations and insights. Key features include automated vulnerability scanning and unauthorized software management, reducing manual efforts. The platform also emphasizes the importance of timely remediation and ongoing risk mitigation across multiple environments. Despite its strengths, users note the need for enhanced integration with additional CMDBs beyond ServiceNow, as well as cost efficiency improvements. Requests also include better report customization, more scan control, and a simplified UI.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Real-time Visibility: Offers continuous insight into asset status and condition.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows for flexible organization and assessment of assets.
External Attack Surface Management: Identifies potential threats from external sources.
Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Reduces manual scanning efforts and identifies vulnerabilities instantly.
Unauthorized Software Management: Detects and manages software not approved for use.
Asset Purge Rule: Automates the removal of obsolete assets from the inventory.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Gains stronger defense through effective asset monitoring.
Efficient Risk Management: Identifies threats quickly, enabling timely resolutions.
Improved Compliance: Assists in meeting industry standards and regulations.
Reduced Manual Effort: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time and resources.
Comprehensive Insight: Provides detailed data for informed decision making.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management enhances asset control by offering visibility into hardware and software configurations. It aids in maintaining security compliance and identifying unauthorized software, crucial for sectors with strict regulatory requirements.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Euronext, YMCA, Telit, Nemours

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cymulate vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

September 2025

Free Report: Cymulate vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cymulate vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.