Bugcrowd vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Bugcrowd and Qualys are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. Bugcrowd is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while Qualys is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Bugcrowd holds a 4.7% mindshare in ASM, compared to Qualys’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bugcrowd users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Bugcrowd

Read 5 Bugcrowd reviews

3,443 Views
1,102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 33 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

3,574 Views
1,108 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Bugcrowd

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Bugcrowd and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competing in the cybersecurity space, focusing on asset management and vulnerability discovery. Bugcrowd stands out for competitive pricing and customer support, while Qualys is favored for comprehensive features ideal for enterprises.

Features: Bugcrowd provides advanced vulnerability detection, user-friendly report creation with markdown support, and a dynamic security testing approach. Qualys offers extensive asset visibility and threat identification with features like dynamic tagging, asset purge rules, and comprehensive asset discovery ensuring detailed information on hardware and software.

Room for Improvement: Bugcrowd could enhance comprehensive risk scoring, integration with third-party tools, and scalability in complex enterprise environments. Qualys needs streamlined user interfaces for ease of use, reduced false positives in vulnerability reports, and quicker setup time for deployment in various IT infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bugcrowd is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, facilitating rapid integration. Qualys requires a more thorough setup process, but offers extensive support suited for enterprise needs, ensuring robust assistance in complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Bugcrowd provides flexible and cost-effective pricing models with high ROI, appealing to a range of businesses. Qualys, with a higher initial setup cost, offers a significant ROI for larger organizations needing comprehensive features. Although more costly, the investment is worthwhile for in-depth asset management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Bugcrowd vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bugcrowd

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (3rd), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (3rd)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (7th), Patch Management (4th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Software Supply Chain Security (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Bugcrowd is 4.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 3.9%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	3.9%
Bugcrowd	4.7%
Other	91.4%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

Ben Gurney

Senior Engineering Manager - Platform Team at eTender Inc

Crowdsourced triage has uncovered critical website vulnerabilities and continuously improves our security posture

Bugcrowd could be improved or enhanced as they seem to have a lot of internal churn at the moment, so they could be more stable and more customer-focused. By customer-focused, I mean they are not very good at communicating what is changing on their side to their customers. I am now on my fourth account manager within one year. My latest call with them was with the fourth account manager saying there have been many changes and apologizing that no one I have spoken to in the past is on this call, but going forwards it will be them. With the fourth account manager in a year, it is hard to trust that message.

Read full review

Nicki Møller

Information Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enables automation and quick access to necessary information

One of the significant challenges Qualys is discovery, which I know Microsoft excels at. I can't recall how well Qualys performs this function; it seems I might be missing some details. However, if there's one key aspect to focus on, it's discovery—the ability to identify assets that you are not aware of, even when you can see they are present. Understanding what those assets are is crucial. With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system. The features within Qualys are limited to what they have developed. Sometimes a complete overview is needed to push to a Power BI dashboard, Splunk, ServiceNow, or other platforms. The export process is incredibly challenging. We needed a developer to write a hundred-line Python script that would loop over certain assets due to export limitations. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could improve its integration capabilities. While it generates substantial data, correlating it with other data sources can be challenging. The export process is difficult, and pre-built integrations with other tools could be enhanced for better process implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Working on Bugcrowd has made me a better security engineer since it provides a competitive environment to report successful vulnerabilities."

"I believe Bugcrowd is highly stable."

"Bugcrowd's use of crowdsourced hackers has helped in discovering unique vulnerabilities."

"I would rate Bugcrowd a ten out of ten."

"Bugcrowd's support team is very active and supportive."

"One of the features I like most about Bugcrowd is the ability to create a report in a very easy way."

"Bugcrowd has programs that disclose rewards and invite researchers to new programs."

"The most valuable aspect of Bugcrowd is that it provides a long list of different websites or web applications where I can report vulnerabilities."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

"My favourite feature of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is its ability to target missing software."

"I would rate Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management ten out of ten."

"It de-duplicates findings and helps you understand what the vulnerabilities from your external scans and your external attack surface management are and how they connect to the vulnerabilities on your internal scans."

"The support has been excellent; they are responsive and effectively bring in the appropriate resources to help solve problems."

"I really enjoy the flexibility of the interface setup configuration for my network VLANs, which makes it very easy to configure."

"The best features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management include its ability to scan and consider each and every endpoint based on the target we have given. This makes it stand out."

"There are no stability issues, and I would rate it a ten out of ten."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets."

"Bugcrowd could be improved or enhanced as they seem to have a lot of internal churn at the moment, so they could be more stable and more customer-focused."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them. They should improve the responsibility type and response time of their customer support, especially when the issue is urgent."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets. If this time could be minimized, it would be very helpful."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago. It now takes more time to resolve a reported vulnerability and receive the payout."

"Sometimes both updates and software types appear together on one list, making it hard to differentiate."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could be more cost-effective by offering a lower price point or integrating with existing VMDR features."

"Further research and development are needed to enhance integration with other cloud agents and products, particularly improving communication with external products and vendors."

"Integration of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, particularly with ServiceNow, takes a very long time, and it needs prioritization of patch rules based on vulnerability risk."

"They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword. They should fix that."

"The activity log is terrible."

"The Qualys CAPS service requires further exploration and improvement, particularly in its handling of protocols and reactivity with MAC and IP addresses for CAP agents."

"It is automatically exporting the vulnerabilities and the assets. However, it would be useful to have the ability to select or to filter which we would like to export."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is market-competitive."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"Qualys offers excellent value for money."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bugcrowd?

I think the pricing and licensing of Bugcrowd are expensive, but we do get good value from it, as we find vulnerabilities that we would otherwise be unaware of.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bugcrowd?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bugcrowd?

I work with Bugcrowd mostly as a crowdsourcing security platform. I use Bugcrowd by putting a brief on Bugcrowd's website, and then their community of security researchers hunt for vulnerabilities ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

We purchased it through a reseller and the pricing was reasonable. We received Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management included in our licensing at no cost for the first year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

The TruRisk feature could help prioritize vulnerabilities and assets, but our issue currently is that we weren't provided with adequate information to set things up correctly. We have many configur...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

My use cases involve using Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management to detect vulnerabilities and then passing on the information to our IT team that has to fix the vulnerabilities. The External Attac...

See all answers

Comparisons

HackerOne vs Bugcrowd

Compared 57% of the time

Synack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 20% of the time

YesWeHack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 10% of the time

Intigriti vs Bugcrowd

Compared 5% of the time

Crowdcurity vs Bugcrowd

Compared 3% of the time

More Bugcrowd Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP)

December 2025

Download Bugcrowd product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

By combining a vast and diverse workforce with a results-driven model, crowdsourced security programs outperform traditional methods-every time.

Bugcrowd

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides advanced real-time asset visibility, dynamic tagging, and External Attack Surface Management. It streamlines asset discovery and management using cloud agents and IP-based scanning, enhancing risk management and software lifecycle tracking.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a comprehensive solution for managing asset inventories and tracking software lifecycle states. It facilitates network visibility and supports zero-day vulnerability solutions, enhancing security posture through efficient monitoring. Users benefit from its cloud-based interface, which provides in-depth asset configurations and insights. Key features include automated vulnerability scanning and unauthorized software management, reducing manual efforts. The platform also emphasizes the importance of timely remediation and ongoing risk mitigation across multiple environments. Despite its strengths, users note the need for enhanced integration with additional CMDBs beyond ServiceNow, as well as cost efficiency improvements. Requests also include better report customization, more scan control, and a simplified UI.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Real-time Visibility: Offers continuous insight into asset status and condition.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows for flexible organization and assessment of assets.
External Attack Surface Management: Identifies potential threats from external sources.
Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Reduces manual scanning efforts and identifies vulnerabilities instantly.
Unauthorized Software Management: Detects and manages software not approved for use.
Asset Purge Rule: Automates the removal of obsolete assets from the inventory.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Gains stronger defense through effective asset monitoring.
Efficient Risk Management: Identifies threats quickly, enabling timely resolutions.
Improved Compliance: Assists in meeting industry standards and regulations.
Reduced Manual Effort: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time and resources.
Comprehensive Insight: Provides detailed data for informed decision making.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management enhances asset control by offering visibility into hardware and software configurations. It aids in maintaining security compliance and identifying unauthorized software, crucial for sectors with strict regulatory requirements.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Zephyr Health, Barracuda Networks, Western Union, Instructure, Aruba Networks, Pinterest, CARD.com, WINK, (ISC)2, StatusPage, WHMCS, Movember

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Free Report: Bugcrowd vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Bugcrowd vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bugcrowd vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.