Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo

Top 10 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
3.9 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Red Hat OpenShift. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled performance, robust security features, and cost-effective solutions, empowering businesses with a scalable and highly reliable cloud platform tailored to meet diverse enterprise needs.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Microsoft Azure
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Microsoft Azure
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Azure offers flexibility with extensive services and fast deployment. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure excels in database management and cost-effectiveness. Azure's complex pricing contrasts with OCI's competitive pricing, catering to Oracle-heavy environments with strong database functionality.
Download Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Microsoft Azure generally has higher setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is recognized for its lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure generally has higher setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is recognized for its lower initial setup expenses.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon AWS
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon AWS
4.2 out of 5
Amazon AWS offers dynamic pricing and extensive global data centers for scalable solutions. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure supports Oracle databases with competitive pricing and Linux compatibility, appealing to enterprises using Oracle applications. Both excel in cloud deployment and offer distinct advantages in pricing and ROI.
Download Amazon AWS vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Amazon AWS offers flexible setup costs, often appealing to startups, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) involves higher initial expenses, targeting enterprises needing robust features. Their differing setups highlight a contrast in scalability and initial investment focus.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon AWS offers flexible setup costs, often appealing to startups, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) involves higher initial expenses, targeting enterprises needing robust features. Their differing setups highlight a contrast in scalability and initial investment focus.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat OpenShift excels in integration and management with advanced deployment capabilities, ideal for secure, large-scale environments. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers robust infrastructure elements and competitive pricing, appealing for cost-effective global cloud solutions prioritized by price and Oracle integration preferences.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report
Red Hat OpenShift requires a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), which offers a more budget-friendly option. Red Hat OpenShift justifies its cost with enterprise-level features, while OCI provides a cost-effective approach with competitive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift requires a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), which offers a more budget-friendly option. Red Hat OpenShift justifies its cost with enterprise-level features, while OCI provides a cost-effective approach with competitive capabilities.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Google Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Google Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Google Cloud's scalability and ease of use attract tech buyers seeking integration with CI/CD tools, while OCI's enterprise database solutions and advanced data protection cater to enterprise needs. In comparison, OCI excels in database support, whereas Google Cloud offers user-friendly navigation and competitive pricing.
Download Google Cloud vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Google Cloud offers a straightforward, no up-front cost setup, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) provides a more complex initial setup process, which could involve higher expenses and time investments, making Google Cloud an easier choice for immediate deployments.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud offers a straightforward, no up-front cost setup, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) provides a more complex initial setup process, which could involve higher expenses and time investments, making Google Cloud an easier choice for immediate deployments.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode)
4.5 out of 5
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) offers efficient virtual server deployment with praised pricing and global coverage. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) excels with enterprise-grade features and seamless Oracle integration, appealing to large organizations needing extensive services and scalability.
Download Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) offers a simple one-time setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) features a more complex pricing structure with initial setup fees, highlighting a significant difference in the ease and predictability of initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) offers a simple one-time setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) features a more complex pricing structure with initial setup fees, highlighting a significant difference in the ease and predictability of initial investment.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers flexible pricing and efficient database management, appealing to enterprises seeking cost reduction. In comparison, VMware Tanzu, integrated with vSphere, enhances monolithic management and Kubernetes capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing cloud-native applications despite its complex setup and higher costs.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure's setup cost is competitive and transparent, while VMware Tanzu Platform may incur higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure's setup cost is competitive and transparent, while VMware Tanzu Platform may incur higher initial expenses.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
SAP Cloud Platform
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
SAP Cloud Platform
4.0 out of 5
SAP Cloud Platform excels in customization and multi-environment functions, ideal for complex projects. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure suits enterprises needing flexible database support and extensive storage, attracting those seeking cost-effective solutions. Both offer unique benefits for different enterprise requirements.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. SAP Cloud Platform Report
SAP Cloud Platform has a moderate setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers a more competitive setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Cloud Platform has a moderate setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers a more competitive setup fee.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Salesforce Platform
4.1 out of 5
Salesforce excels in customization and CRM integration, benefiting marketing processes. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers robust database options and comprehensive cloud services. Tech buyers may choose Salesforce for its CRM capabilities or OCI for its cost-effectiveness and infrastructure support.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. Salesforce Platform Report
Salesforce Platform presents substantial initial setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Salesforce Platform presents substantial initial setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenditure between the two solutions.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Harbor
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Harbor
4.0 out of 5
OCI is suitable for enterprises needing wide-ranging cloud solutions due to its scalability and comprehensive features. In comparison, Harbor appeals to organizations focusing on container management, offering advanced security and compliance features like vulnerability scanning and role-based access control.
Download Harbor vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) involves an upfront setup cost that offers flexibility and scalability, whereas Harbor requires a lower initial setup expense, focusing on container management efficiency, highlighting distinct cost strategies tailored to different IT needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) involves an upfront setup cost that offers flexibility and scalability, whereas Harbor requires a lower initial setup expense, focusing on container management efficiency, highlighting distinct cost strategies tailored to different IT needs.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Alibaba Cloud
3.7 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Alibaba Cloud
3.7 out of 5
Alibaba Cloud offers cost-effective solutions with features like ECS and VM, favored for AI and ease of use. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure excels in enterprise-grade database services and high availability, appealing to enterprises needing robust IT infrastructure management.
Download Alibaba Cloud vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Alibaba Cloud offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) may present higher initial setup expenses due to its tailored services.
View comparison
Pricing
Alibaba Cloud offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) may present higher initial setup expenses due to its tailored services.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Pivotal Cloud Foundry
3.8 out of 5
PCF excels in scaling and Java application integration, appealing for its seamless CI/CD compatibility. In comparison, OCI offers extensive database management and cost-effective pricing, making it ideal for businesses needing versatile infrastructure and scalable solutions.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report
Pivotal Cloud Foundry requires a higher initial setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers a more cost-effective setup solution. This difference impacts initial budget considerations significantly.
View comparison
Pricing
Pivotal Cloud Foundry requires a higher initial setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers a more cost-effective setup solution. This difference impacts initial budget considerations significantly.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon ECR
4.4 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon ECR
4.4 out of 5
Amazon ECR provides specialized container management with seamless AWS integration, ideal for users focused on efficient containerization. In comparison, OCI delivers a versatile cloud solution with extensive infrastructure capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing diverse hybrid and on-prem solutions.
Download Amazon ECR vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Amazon ECR has a straightforward setup with minimal costs compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, which involves more complex and potentially higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon ECR has a straightforward setup with minimal costs compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, which involves more complex and potentially higher setup expenses.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Google Firebase
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Google Firebase
4.2 out of 5
Google Firebase offers a unified platform with features like Realtime Database, supporting fast app development. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provides enterprise-grade features with robust database management and high availability, suiting complex IT needs in large enterprises.
Download Google Firebase vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Google Firebase offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure presents a more complex setup process that may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Firebase offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure presents a more complex setup process that may involve higher initial expenses.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
VMware Cloud Foundation
4.1 out of 5
VMware Cloud Foundation is ideal for managing diverse cloud deployments with its advanced automation and AWS integration capabilities. In comparison, OCI excels in database offerings and performance, appealing to tech buyers focused on budget-friendly, database-centric, and hybrid cloud strategies.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. VMware Cloud Foundation Report
VMware Cloud Foundation has a higher initial setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more affordable setup price, highlighting a significant cost difference in deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Cloud Foundation has a higher initial setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more affordable setup price, highlighting a significant cost difference in deployment expenses.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)
4.3 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers robust database management, turnkey solutions, and flexible integrations appealing to tech buyers prioritizing database capabilities. In comparison, Nutanix Cloud Clusters excels in data portability and seamless hybrid management, ideal for buyers seeking versatile cloud environment solutions.
Download Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) presents a straightforward setup cost approach, whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) requires a more complex initial setup investment. This distinct difference highlights OCI's ease of entry compared to NC2's detailed setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) presents a straightforward setup cost approach, whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) requires a more complex initial setup investment. This distinct difference highlights OCI's ease of entry compared to NC2's detailed setup requirements.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Azure Container Registry
4.1 out of 5
Azure Container Registry offers seamless Azure service integration and efficiency for daily workflows. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provides extensive database capabilities and enterprise-level integrations, making it appealing for enterprises focused on database management. Azure excels in flexibility, while OCI offers robust database solutions.
Download Azure Container Registry vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Azure Container Registry has a setup cost that is generally low, making it budget-friendly, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) often involves higher initial costs, reflecting its extensive range of features and enterprise-level capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Container Registry has a setup cost that is generally low, making it budget-friendly, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) often involves higher initial costs, reflecting its extensive range of features and enterprise-level capabilities.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
IBM Public Cloud
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
IBM Public Cloud
3.9 out of 5
IBM Public Cloud offers affordability with robust security and AI tools. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provides high-performance computing and data management, appealing to enterprises needing advanced capabilities. IBM's pricing suits budget-conscious buyers, while OCI's features promise long-term operational returns.
Download IBM Public Cloud vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
IBM Public Cloud involves a higher initial setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing distinction may influence preference towards OCI for cost-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Public Cloud involves a higher initial setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing distinction may influence preference towards OCI for cost-conscious businesses.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Heroku
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Heroku
4.2 out of 5
Heroku appeals to developers with easy application deployment and a robust add-on ecosystem. In comparison, OCI offers scalable infrastructure and strong security, catering to enterprises seeking resource-intensive operations. A tech buyer may choose Heroku for simplicity and OCI for extensive performance capabilities.
Download Heroku vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Heroku offers straightforward setup with potentially higher initial costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) may have lower setup costs but requires more complex configuration processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku offers straightforward setup with potentially higher initial costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) may have lower setup costs but requires more complex configuration processes.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
SAP S4HANA on AWS
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
SAP S4HANA on AWS
4.2 out of 5
SAP S4HANA on AWS offers enterprise-focused features with finance and AI integration, appealing to large organizations. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure emphasizes cost-effectiveness, benefiting businesses needing budget-friendly cloud solutions with strong database and legacy system transition capabilities.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report
SAP S4HANA on AWS has a higher initial setup cost compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), which offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP S4HANA on AWS has a higher initial setup cost compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), which offers a more cost-effective setup.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Google App Engine
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Google App Engine
4.1 out of 5
Google App Engine offers zero maintenance and seamless scalability, ideal for startups seeking integration with Google services. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provides robust database environments and customization, appealing to enterprises needing extensive features and flexible pricing for large-scale operations.
Download Google App Engine vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Google App Engine has a straightforward setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure involves more complex setup fees. The key difference lies in the simplicity of Google's payment plan compared to Oracle's detailed structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Google App Engine has a straightforward setup cost, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure involves more complex setup fees. The key difference lies in the simplicity of Google's payment plan compared to Oracle's detailed structure.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
DigitalOcean
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
DigitalOcean
4.1 out of 5
DigitalOcean excels with simplicity, fast deployment, and a cost-effective model ideal for startups. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers comprehensive features, high performance, and scalability, appealing to enterprises seeking flexibility with both hybrid and public cloud solutions.
Download DigitalOcean vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
DigitalOcean offers a straightforward setup cost that appeals to small businesses, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure presents a more complex pricing structure potentially advantageous for larger enterprises needing extensive customization.
View comparison
Pricing
DigitalOcean offers a straightforward setup cost that appeals to small businesses, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure presents a more complex pricing structure potentially advantageous for larger enterprises needing extensive customization.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud
4.1 out of 5
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud excels in seamless SAP integration and real-time analytics, ideal for businesses with heavy SAP reliance. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers advanced infrastructure and cost-efficient scalability, appealing to diverse businesses seeking comprehensive IaaS solutions and flexible deployment options.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud involves higher initial setup costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more cost-effective setup. This distinction highlights the financial entry differences between the two cloud solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud involves higher initial setup costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers a more cost-effective setup. This distinction highlights the financial entry differences between the two cloud solutions.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon Lightsail
4.4 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon Lightsail
4.4 out of 5
Amazon Lightsail offers simplicity with manageability, attracting startups. In comparison, OCI suits enterprises needing advanced features. Amazon Lightsail's user-friendly tools appeal to budget-conscious projects, while OCI's robust infrastructure and hybrid compatibility justify its cost for complex enterprise needs. Each caters to distinct priorities.
Download Amazon Lightsail vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Amazon Lightsail offers a straightforward setup with predictable low costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) involves a more complex setup with varied pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon Lightsail offers a straightforward setup with predictable low costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) involves a more complex setup with varied pricing structures.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon Bedrock
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Amazon Bedrock
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is known for robust database management and competitive pricing, appealing to enterprises needing detailed service offerings. In comparison, Amazon Bedrock focuses on AI model integrations, attracting those who prioritize AI capabilities and seamless integration with AWS services.
Download Amazon Bedrock vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers competitive setup costs compared to Amazon Bedrock, which presents a higher initial investment. Users may find OCI more cost-effective at the outset due to these reduced setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers competitive setup costs compared to Amazon Bedrock, which presents a higher initial investment. Users may find OCI more cost-effective at the outset due to these reduced setup expenses.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Equinix Metal
1 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Equinix Metal
1 out of 5
OCI appeals with comprehensive integration capabilities suitable for enterprises seeking diverse cloud solutions. In comparison, Equinix Metal attracts customers with its flexible, customizable bare-metal servers, offering rapid provisioning and high performance, though it may incur higher costs for cutting-edge features.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers a cost-effective setup with minimal upfront fees, while Equinix Metal incurs higher initial expenses for configuration and onboarding.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers a cost-effective setup with minimal upfront fees, while Equinix Metal incurs higher initial expenses for configuration and onboarding.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Google Compute Engine
4.4 out of 5
Google Compute Engine excels in integration with Google services, offering advanced customization and cost-saving features. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provides strong database integration and scalability, attracting enterprises with existing Oracle investments, particularly for autonomous database features.
Download Google Compute Engine vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Google Compute Engine has lower setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers more extensive initial configuration options. The differences highlight Google's affordability compared to OCI's tailored setup flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Compute Engine has lower setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers more extensive initial configuration options. The differences highlight Google's affordability compared to OCI's tailored setup flexibility.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
NTT Cloud
2.8 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
NTT Cloud
2.8 out of 5
NTT Cloud excels in cost-effectiveness, integration, and customer support, appealing to businesses seeking streamlined solutions. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers superior computational power and scalability, attracting enterprises prioritizing advanced features and long-term value. Both cater to varied business needs and strategic goals.
Download NTT Cloud vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
NTT Cloud's setup cost is perceived as more affordable, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) requires a higher initial investment, reflecting their focus on different market sectors and offering diverse scalability options.
View comparison
Pricing
NTT Cloud's setup cost is perceived as more affordable, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) requires a higher initial investment, reflecting their focus on different market sectors and offering diverse scalability options.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Skytap Cloud
1 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Skytap Cloud
1 out of 5
Skytap Cloud supports legacy system migration by easily replicating complex environments. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure excels in security and scalability for high-performance applications, offering robust IaaS capabilities. Tech buyers may choose Skytap for legacy compatibility or OCI for comprehensive enterprise solutions.
Skytap Cloud offers a more straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) requires a higher investment for setup but provides comprehensive enterprise features.
View comparison
Pricing
Skytap Cloud offers a more straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) requires a higher investment for setup but provides comprehensive enterprise features.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Logo
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers competitive pricing, strong database solutions, and diverse features for seamless Oracle Database management. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud excels with Kubernetes capabilities and flexible multi-cloud integration, attracting enterprises needing advanced cloud orchestration and integration features.
Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers competitive initial setup costs attracting businesses seeking budget-friendly cloud solutions, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud frequently involves higher upfront expenses, reflecting its advanced enterprise capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers competitive initial setup costs attracting businesses seeking budget-friendly cloud solutions, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud frequently involves higher upfront expenses, reflecting its advanced enterprise capabilities.

Related categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
PaaS Clouds
Container Registry