We performed a comparison between JFrog Container Registry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."
"Frankly speaking, I've been very impressed with the stability the solution offers. Everything is working very well at the moment, and we haven't had any issues or faced any bugs or glitches."
"The security on the solution is very good."
"I am impressed with the tool's upscaling and resiliency features."
"The pricing isn't too bad."
"Oracle Cloud Platform is a good solution because with large data platforms the data migration can be a challenge and this is the reason to move and migrate towards the cloud from on-premises."
"The initial setup of Oracle Cloud is simple...It is a scalable solution."
"It's reliable, performs well, and is often faster than running applications on separate machines due to optimized performance and networking capabilities within OCI."
"The product is easy to use and deploy."
"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
"It should have other workloads from other suppliers running on the solution."
"It could be more affordable."
"The solution's reporting part is not good and needs more development."
"The integration tools that they offer are quite complex to use."
"The framework from AWS is so good, I would like to see this feature in OCI."
"The functionalities could be simplified as it is a bit difficult to learn."
"I think that there could be a more user-friendly environment when it comes to the options that Oracle presents through the Oracle Cloud Platform."
"In a future release, they could improve by adding some form of machine learning and artificial intelligence."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 2 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 5th in Container Registry with 91 reviews. JFrog Container Registry is rated 8.0, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Acts as a central repository and comes with code scanning feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Red Hat Quay and VMware Harbor Registry, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and OpenShift.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.