We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Registry solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"Specific tokens can be used to set folder structure or restrict things like read or write access."
"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."
"The scanning of Docker images is the most valuable feature."
"Feature-wise, the security model and access controls are pretty straightforward and valuable"
"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."
"It's great for storing images on containers."
"The technical support is good, they have been responsive and helpful."
"The performance and processing capability are excellent."
"I like the solution’s stability, performance, and fault alerts."
"Overall, there are some very good features on Oracle and it offers good customization capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Cloud is its autonomous database."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Cloud is the digital assistant."
"Oracle Cloud has wonderful features and offerings as a service. It's not just a pure-play cloud product or SaaS application. It has a complete suite from infrastructure to platform as a service to software as a service, and this is what I find most valuable in Oracle Cloud. For infrastructure on the cloud or infrastructure as a service on the cloud, there's OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure). Oracle Cloud is easily available. You just click it. I also found the feature of creating a landing zone valuable. Oracle Cloud is also very flexible as it lets you have a hybrid cloud model along with other cloud solutions. I also like that it offers good management on the cloud. Oracle Cloud is ready to use as a service, and that's wonderful because the time to market is very quick. I also like that Oracle Cloud offers high performance and high availability. A lot of people claim that there's high availability in their companies' cloud operations, but technically speaking, pure high availability in today's context is found in Oracle Cloud."
"We use the solution for EC2. It helps me to create around six servers for free to test out things. It also provides me with an authenticated cloud nameserver. We also use it as a wireguard endpoint."
"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."
"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"We have found that it is sometimes difficult to pull images from the host application."
"The solution has no areas that need improvement."
"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
"The price of the subscription is too high and excludes some potential customers."
"It takes more time to release resources than one of its competitors."
"The solution's scalability is an area with shortcomings...Mid-level customers feel that Oracle is not scalable in their environment and is an enterprise-level segment solution."
"Customer service could be improved."
"The packaging part of the software needs improvement. It lacks customization abilities for users. Giving them VMs for machine learning or running their own programs like Azure and Amazon, for example. Things like scalability based on the requirement of the tools. Oracle still lacks these kinds of things. For example, if you need a VM from Oracle, you need to pay for a monthly fee. They started developing containership but it's still at the initial stage and it's still lacking. They also need to develop integration between packages."
"They offer some basic services but the choice is not as rich as other cloud providers."
"The solution needs to improve the discovery and assessment of the existing infrastructure."
"The functionalities could be simplified as it is a bit difficult to learn."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 5th in Container Registry with 91 reviews. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Harbor and Red Hat Quay, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and Pivotal Cloud Foundry. See our Azure Container Registry vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.