We performed a comparison between Azure Red Hat OpenShift and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."
"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."
"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."
"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."
"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."
"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."
"We have not had any downtime using the solution."
"The main benefit is that you're getting all of the resources you require on a subscription base. So, you get to pay as you go instead of having to have a CAPEX, you convert your CAPEX to OPEX to cover the data center cost."
"Oracle is valuable for improving performance and addressing issues between the nodes of clusters for private IPs. It provides a private connection between the client and the security cluster."
"This is a highly available and scalable solution that can host both modern and legacy on-premises applications."
"It is a stable solution since it offers a very powerful performance to its users."
"I like having the ability to easily run Oracle Linux server instances and to deploy Oracle Middleware and WebLogic servers. Oracle's Infrastructure as a Service products are also very useful, and we're using those right now within Oracle OCI."
"The product is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Interface."
"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."
"The product is expensive."
"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."
"They need to improve the core licensing model."
"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."
"Automation could be improved."
"Portability of the VMware environment into the Oracle Cloud should be made more simple."
"The solution should integrate better with other tools and different vendors."
"Oracle Cloud's price is very high."
"The integration tools that they offer are quite complex to use."
"The solution requires tighter integration capabilities."
"They could add more features."
"The solution isn't very mature. The on-premises deployment has more features and the cloud needs to work to match those options."
"The tool should provide more options like other cloud services. Also, it should improve scalability with the free version."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Red Hat OpenShift is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in PaaS Clouds with 91 reviews. Azure Red Hat OpenShift is rated 8.4, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Red Hat OpenShift writes "Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". Azure Red Hat OpenShift is most compared with OpenShift, Amazon AWS and VMware Tanzu Application Service, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and OpenShift. See our Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
