Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
JFrog Container Registry Logo

JFrog Container Registry Reviews

Vendor: JFrog
3.8 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is JFrog Container Registry?

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

Get the JFrog Container Registry Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Container Registry, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Harbor and more!
JFrog Container Registry is the #2 ranked solution in top Container Registry solutions. PeerSpot users give JFrog Container Registry an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. JFrog Container Registry is most commonly compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI): JFrog Container Registry vs Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). JFrog Container Registry is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 65% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
JFrog Container Registry
March 2026
Get the report
Helped 884,328 peers since 2012

Featured JFrog Container Registry reviews

Read more reviews

JFrog Container Registry mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of JFrog Container Registry in the Container Registry category stands at 25.3%, down from 30.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
JFrog Container Registry25.3%
Harbor25.0%
Amazon ECR17.1%
Other32.599999999999994%
Container Registry

PeerResearch reports based on JFrog Container Registry reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryContainer RegistryMar 19, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 19, 2026Download
ComparisonJFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECRMar 19, 2026Download
ComparisonJFrog Container Registry vs HarborMar 19, 2026Download
ComparisonJFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container RegistryMar 19, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)3.92.2%92%97 interviewsAdd to research
Harbor4.025.0%100%2 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

JFrog Container Registry offers valuable features like code and X-ray scanning, which enhance security by detecting vulnerabilities in containers and Helm charts. Users appreciate its seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines and workflows across hybrid SaaS environments. It supports multi-cloud deployments via AWS, Azure, and GCP. Its enterprise-grade capabilities are utilized for storage, managing Docker setups, and configuring repositories on Kubernetes, aiding SDLC processes to meet sprint targets efficiently. Pricing concerns exist regarding utilization time.
  • "The most valuable feature of JFrog Container Registry for me has been the X-ray scans because when we ship the product, we need to ensure that there are no vulnerabilities in our application, and X-ray helps us find vulnerabilities in our containers or Helm charts."
  • "I have built an end-to-end CI/CD pipeline with JFrog and the registry on Kubernetes, utilizing Jenkins, JFrog X-ray, and more."
  • "It was a good experience with JFrog Container Registry."

Room for Improvement

JFrog Container Registry requires improvement in performance during integration, user-friendly documentation especially for cloud offerings, and advanced security integration. Users report challenges with installation and a steep learning curve. There's a need for clearer pricing information and better pricing controls. Enhanced features for vulnerability scanning and automation for pipeline promotion are suggested. Storage costs are high, prompting considerations of moving to more cost-effective platforms.
  • "Pricing, purge of data or historical data, ease of usage, pricing model, setting the current pricing, changes in the configuration so that the pricing can be brought down, and better utilization of JFrog Container Registry are the issues I face."
  • "The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."
  • "In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

Pricing

Enterprise users find JFrog Container Registry pricing somewhat expensive compared to competitors. They use the Pro version for 6GB data consumption, considering the $750 Enterprise plan. JFrog's pricing offers self-hosted and cloud options, with costs based on licenses, subscriptions, nodes, and repository limits. Some rate its affordability low but find the $3 annual licensing cost reasonable.
  • "JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."
  • "The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."
  • "The solution is expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use JFrog Container Registry to compile code, manage software artifacts, and store containers and Helm charts. It supports integration with various tools, offering a centralized platform for managing build-to-release processes. High availability is ensured via Kubernetes deployments, while X-ray scans identify vulnerabilities. This process involves downloading third-party containers, handling updates, and running security checks. CI/CD pipelines, local and remote repositories, and private container registry use enhance its functionality.

Service and Support

JFrog Container Registry's tech team is responsive, though some mention room for improvement in response time. Users note the documentation is straightforward and useful. Some have not needed to engage with the tech team, while others have relied on managers for contact in previous projects.

Deployment

JFrog Container Registry's initial setup was generally straightforward for teams with prior experience, taking approximately 15 to 30 minutes. However, some found it initially challenging, relying on documentation and online resources due to a less developed interface. Setup varied based on integration tools used, with Azure DevOps posing more challenges compared to GitLab and Jenkins. Those familiar with JFrog's other offerings found the process manageable thanks to their existing knowledge.

Scalability

JFrog Container Registry is appreciated for its scalability, rated around eight out of ten. Many teams within companies adopt it, yet some express that cloud-based solutions might offer superior scalability, with Nexus occasionally cited as slightly better. No major challenges are commonly reported, though a restriction was noted when uploading large Kubernetes artifacts. Despite this, enterprises generally find JFrog Container Registry satisfactory for their development needs.

Stability

Users note that JFrog Container Registry is generally stable. With extensive use in CI/CD workflows, automation is fast, and integration with IoT device management shows its reliability. However, some mention occasional lagging or crashing with DevOps and network exceptions during concurrent download operations. Despite these issues, they rate its stability eight out of ten, highlighting its reliability in most scenarios.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our JFrog Container Registry Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Retailer
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Government
5%
University
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Sports Company
1%

Compare JFrog Container Registry with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about JFrog Container Registry

JFrog Container Registry customers

Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard

Related questions

  • 9
When evaluating Container Registry, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 35
Why is Container Registry important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Container Registry

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs JFrog Container Registry
Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry
Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry
Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry
Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry
VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry
See all alternatives
 
JFrog Container Registry Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Consultant at Mettler-Toledo International Inc.4.0No summary available
Senior Cloud/DevOps Engineer3.5No summary available
DevOps Engineer at J. Crew Group, Inc.4.0I had a good experience using JFrog Container Registry to manage artifacts in our DevOps processes, appreciating features like image scanning, though pricing remains a concern. More clarity and control over costs would enhance its value further.
DevOps Engineer at Infosys4.0JFrog Container Registry provides a centralized solution for managing software artifacts. It integrates development and operations workflows, supports multi-cloud deployments, but can be challenging to install initially. It's valuable, cost-effective, and widely used in larger companies like Walmart.
Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC3.0We use JFrog Container Registry for deploying images and Helm charts in our Kubernetes-based environment. While JFrog Xray is a valuable feature, the lack of clear cloud documentation, complex pricing, and high storage costs are significant drawbacks, pushing us to consider alternatives.
Sr. Systems Engineer at The TCW Group4.0We use JFrog Container Registry to compile and manage code, benefiting from its code scanning feature. Despite occasional performance issues with GitHub integrations, it surpasses our previous solution, ProGet, and provides ROI.