Top 10 IBM MaaS360 Alternatives

Name: IBM MaaS360
Brand: IBM
Rating: 3.9 (36 reviews)

Vendor: IBM

3.9 out of 5

36 reviews
84% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top IBM MaaS360 Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM MaaS360 based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne, and Workspace ONE UEM. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

IBM MaaS360 provides robust support for lost devices and secure email deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Intune excels in integration with Azure and Office 365. IBM faces challenges in Android enrollment, while Intune encounters issues with macOS support and policy synchronization.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. Microsoft Intune Report

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 offers a competitive setup cost, while Microsoft Intune is noted for its higher initial configuration fees, emphasizing a significant cost discrepancy.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 offers a competitive setup cost, while Microsoft Intune is noted for its higher initial configuration fees, emphasizing a significant cost discrepancy.

NinjaOne

4.1 out of 5

NinjaOne

4.1 out of 5

IBM MaaS360 excels with comprehensive security features like remote management and detailed inventory integration. In comparison, NinjaOne offers strong device monitoring and user-friendly automation. IBM's cost may be higher, while NinjaOne's pricing is cost-effective with discounts at scale.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. NinjaOne Report

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 typically involves a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup for users.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 typically involves a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup for users.

Workspace ONE UEM

4.0 out of 5

Workspace ONE UEM

4.0 out of 5

IBM MaaS360 is known for its cost-effectiveness and excellent customer support, whereas Workspace ONE UEM provides a broader feature set. In comparison, Workspace ONE UEM is favored due to its comprehensive functionalities, while IBM MaaS360 users appreciate its intuitive dashboard and robust security features.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. Workspace ONE UEM Report

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 has a lower initial setup cost compared to Workspace ONE UEM. Workspace ONE UEM, however, often presents higher setup costs but includes additional features right from the start.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 has a lower initial setup cost compared to Workspace ONE UEM. Workspace ONE UEM, however, often presents higher setup costs but includes additional features right from the start.

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix excels in endpoint management with comprehensive patch management features and interactive APIs. In comparison, IBM MaaS360 focuses on mobile device management, offering ease in BYOD policy management and secure app distribution while supporting various deployment options for flexible implementation.

Download BigFix vs. IBM MaaS360 Report

Pricing

BigFix offers a straightforward setup cost, while IBM MaaS360 includes a more flexible pricing model, highlighting clear differences in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

BigFix offers a straightforward setup cost, while IBM MaaS360 includes a more flexible pricing model, highlighting clear differences in initial investment.

Jamf Pro

4.7 out of 5

Jamf Pro

4.7 out of 5

IBM MaaS360 is praised for comprehensive security features. In comparison, Jamf Pro is appreciated for seamless Apple device integration. IBM MaaS360 offers competitive pricing, whereas Jamf Pro is considered worth its higher cost for advanced features and high ROI.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. Jamf Pro Report

Pricing

The setup cost for IBM MaaS360 is minimal and straightforward, while Jamf Pro has a more intricate and potentially higher initial setup fee.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup cost for IBM MaaS360 is minimal and straightforward, while Jamf Pro has a more intricate and potentially higher initial setup fee.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central

4.1 out of 5

ManageEngine Endpoint Central

4.1 out of 5

ManageEngine Endpoint Central is recognized for comprehensive patch management and cost-effectiveness, ideal for mid-sized organizations seeking value. In comparison, IBM MaaS360 offers advanced security and compliance features, making it appealing for enterprises with higher budgets prioritizing mobile device management.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central Report

Pricing

ManageEngine Endpoint Central has a lower setup cost compared to IBM MaaS360, offering budget-friendly initial deployment. IBM MaaS360, on the other hand, has a higher setup cost but provides extensive features justifying the investment.

View comparison

Pricing

SOTI MobiControl

4.1 out of 5

SOTI MobiControl

4.1 out of 5

IBM MaaS360 excels in ease of use and integration with comprehensive security features. In comparison, SOTI MobiControl provides deep customization and supports a wide range of devices. Tech buyers might choose IBM MaaS360 for simplicity or SOTI MobiControl for extensive features and detailed control.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. SOTI MobiControl Report

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 has an affordable setup cost, while SOTI MobiControl tends to have a steeper initial setup expense. These differences highlight the initial investment required for each mobile device management solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Samsung Knox

4.1 out of 5

Samsung Knox

4.1 out of 5

Samsung Knox is great for securing mobile devices. It offers robust features like real-time protection and easy device management. Users appreciate its reliability but find room for improvement in customization options. Ideal for businesses needing strong mobile security without compromising device performance.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. Samsung Knox Report

View comparison

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)

4.3 out of 5

IBM MaaS360 leads in pricing and support, with extensive security controls and policy management. In comparison, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager excels in features, offering seamless integration and robust network management. IBM focuses on ease of use, while Meraki delivers advanced analytics and application control. IBM is cost-effective, whereas Meraki suits feature-rich needs. IBM offers straightforward deployment, while Meraki ensures quick, integrated setup.

Download Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. IBM MaaS360 Report

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 has a moderate setup cost, while Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) has a higher initial investment. Cisco Meraki's higher setup cost may reflect its advanced features compared to IBM MaaS360's more economical approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Sophos Mobile

3.9 out of 5

Sophos Mobile

3.9 out of 5

IBM MaaS360 appeals with competitive pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, Sophos Mobile is preferred for its advanced threat protection and high-level security features. IBM MaaS360 benefits from strong mobile device management, while Sophos Mobile offers comprehensive protection, making it worth the higher cost.

Download IBM MaaS360 vs. Sophos Mobile Report

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 has a lower setup cost compared to Sophos Mobile, which can impact overall initial expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM MaaS360 has a lower setup cost compared to Sophos Mobile, which can impact overall initial expenditure.