


Citrix Endpoint Management and IBM MaaS360 are competing products in mobile device management. Citrix Endpoint Management seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, offering a better user experience at lower costs, whereas IBM MaaS360 shines with its robust feature set.
Features: Citrix Endpoint Management offers an intuitive management interface, seamless integration with Citrix products, and comprehensive security for enterprise mobility. IBM MaaS360 provides AI-driven productivity tools, extensive device management options, and the ability to manage corporate data in a secure application container.
Room for Improvement: Citrix Endpoint Management could expand its AI capabilities, offer more third-party integrations, and enhance analytics tools. IBM MaaS360 could simplify its deployment process, reduce its pricing model complexity, and improve integration with non-IBM services.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix Endpoint Management is known for straightforward deployment and comprehensive support, making setup simple. IBM MaaS360 has a more complex deployment process, but its responsive customer service efficiently addresses challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Citrix Endpoint Management is cost-effective, balancing features and support at a lower price for favorable ROI. IBM MaaS360, with potentially higher setup costs, offers a long-term investment due to its advanced features that promise better ROI over time.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
With Microsoft Intune, tasks such as device provisioning, policy deployment, application delivery, and compliance enforcement require less manual effort than in more traditional management models.
After implementing Citrix Endpoint Management, there is a return on investment for my customers because we provide three services: first is the license, where we got margin; second, deployment service, which typically has two types—one where Citrix will do the deployment and the other where a partner should do it, and we deploy this solution for about 80% of the customers in India; third is after deployment support.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
Technical support for Citrix Endpoint Management is not satisfactory.
This product requires some mature understanding, so sometimes they can handle small problems, but for major or architecture-related issues, their L3 or our L3 engineer helps them understand the problem.
The support from Citrix has been satisfactory.
IBM's support and technical service were helpful when needed.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
My colleagues using iOS have faced issues, such as logging problems requiring frequent password entries.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
In my experience, Microsoft Intune is a stable platform as it is a cloud-based service, and updates are regularly delivered by Microsoft.
The solution's stability is below expectations.
The solution is stable, though there are occasional restarts, which are not critical.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
The main issue is the change from perpetual licenses to subscription-based ones, which has increased our costs significantly.
With AI being present, they may increase some AI-related features in the future.
The units are not updating the operating system as specified in the policy.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
The switch to subscription-based licensing has made it much more expensive.
For this client, the solution has been quite cheap.
The setup cost pricing for Citrix Endpoint Management varies; I can say $3,000 per user license for setup.
The pricing and licensing experience with IBM MaaS360 was satisfactory and not expensive.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
We have found the ability to manage user accounts on shared devices valuable as it reduces the need for multiple licenses, which saves costs.
The change to a subscription-based model has removed the financial benefit we previously had.
The main benefit of IBM MaaS360 is phone control and rollout.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 24.3% |
| IBM MaaS360 | 7.6% |
| Citrix Endpoint Management | 2.2% |
| Other | 65.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 130 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 55 |
| Large Enterprise | 170 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
Citrix Endpoint Management offers streamlined deployment, secure application delivery, and centralized management for iOS and Android platforms. It supports BYOD initiatives, with data housed in a data center, enhancing security and compliance.
Citrix Endpoint Management serves as a unified tool for managing diverse devices such as mobile phones, laptops, and IoT gadgets. It facilitates mobile device management, containerizes corporate applications, and supports BYOD for secure data access, further enabling remote management, troubleshooting, and application deployment. Users benefit from a flexible transition from on-premise to cloud models, optimizing user experience through proactive monitoring.
What are the key features of Citrix Endpoint Management?In healthcare, Citrix Endpoint Management streamlines device management for secure data handling, ensuring compliance with regulations. Retailers use it to enhance customer experience with efficient management and monitoring, while educational institutions deploy it to manage and secure remote learning environments.
IBM MaaS360 enhances mobile device management with tracking, security, app deployment, policy management, and integration with Apple DEP and Android Enterprise. It supports remote control, cost efficiency, and is user-friendly, suitable for both corporate and BYOD environments.
MaaS360 offers a comprehensive suite for managing and securing mobile devices. With features like encryption, passcode enforcement, and containerization, it ensures data security and compliance. MaaS360 simplifies app deployment via distribution groups and integrates seamlessly with Apple and Android systems. Its focus on kiosk mode, application security, and automated provisioning make it a strategic choice for companies prioritizing a robust endpoint management strategy. Though it offers extensive options, improvements in notifications, user management, and Microsoft integration are needed.
What are the most important features of IBM MaaS360?IBM MaaS360 finds applications in industries needing robust mobile device management and security. Enterprises deploy it widely to ensure compliance and safeguard corporate data, providing application control, data leak prevention, and secure email management. It is used for configuring policies for field staff and enabling efficient device enrollment, significantly cutting initial setup costs.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.