Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo

Top 10 Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Alternatives

Vendor: Hitachi Vantara
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
1,440 followers
Start review

Top Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerStore, Dell PowerScale (Isilon), and IBM FlashSystem. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled scalability, exceptional performance, and cutting-edge data protection. Its intuitive management and efficient data management tools set a new standard for enterprise storage solutions.

Hitachi Vantara Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hitachi Vantara, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
Dell PowerStore
4.3 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
Dell PowerStore
4.3 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers flexibility, scalability, and high performance, making it cost-effective with favorable ROI. In comparison, Dell PowerStore excels with advanced automation, intelligent data management, and superior customer service, justifying its higher cost for long-term value.
Download Dell PowerStore vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Report
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers a higher initial setup cost, whereas Dell PowerStore presents a more budget-friendly setup. Dell PowerStore users report quicker and more straightforward installation procedures compared to their Hitachi counterparts.
View comparison
Pricing
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers a higher initial setup cost, whereas Dell PowerStore presents a more budget-friendly setup. Dell PowerStore users report quicker and more straightforward installation procedures compared to their Hitachi counterparts.
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon)
4.4 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform stands out with high availability and data protection, appealing to those needing stability and scalability. In comparison, Dell PowerScale attracts tech buyers with AI integration and unstructured data management, making it ideal for businesses focused on dynamic workloads.
Download Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Report
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Dell PowerScale (Isilon) offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Dell PowerScale (Isilon) offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
IBM FlashSystem
4.1 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
IBM FlashSystem
4.1 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers robust performance, scalability, and reliability with a cost-effective advantage, while IBM FlashSystem excels with speed, management simplicity, and advanced features. In comparison, IBM FlashSystem provides innovative data reduction and encryption, making it ideal for performance-critical applications.
Download Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem Report
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform has a higher setup cost compared to IBM FlashSystem, emphasizing IBM's more cost-effective initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform has a higher setup cost compared to IBM FlashSystem, emphasizing IBM's more cost-effective initial investment.
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
NetApp FAS Series
4.4 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
NetApp FAS Series
4.4 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers reliability and scalability with strong compression and high-performance flash capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing robust storage. In comparison, NetApp FAS Series excels in flexibility and data management, ideal for complex networking with efficient Snap technology and seamless virtualization integration.
Download Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. NetApp FAS Series Report
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform often highlights lower setup costs, while NetApp FAS Series may require a higher initial investment. This distinction can guide selections based on budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform often highlights lower setup costs, while NetApp FAS Series may require a higher initial investment. This distinction can guide selections based on budget constraints.
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
4.3 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Logo
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
4.3 out of 5

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers high performance and advanced analytics, suitable for flexible enterprise storage needs. In comparison, HPE 3PAR StoreServ features efficient data management and deduplication, appealing to those requiring scalability and competitive pricing. Each solution suits different enterprise priorities.

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Report
Setup costs for Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform are higher due to its robust infrastructure, while HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers a more cost-effective setup with easier initial deployment. The choice depends largely on budget constraints and deployment preferences.
View comparison
Pricing
Setup costs for Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform are higher due to its robust infrastructure, while HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers a more cost-effective setup with easier initial deployment. The choice depends largely on budget constraints and deployment preferences.

Related categories

NAS
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
All-Flash Storage