IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is #5 ranked solution in best NVMe All-Flash Arrays and #20 ranked solution in best All-Flash Storage Arrays. PeerSpot users give IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is most commonly compared to Dell PowerStore: IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Dell PowerStore. IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 52% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a comms service provider, accounting for 24% of all views.
Buyer's Guide

Download the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: July 2022

What is IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe?

IBM FlashSystem 9100 combines the performance of flash and Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) end-to-end with the reliability and innovation of IBM FlashCore technology and the rich features of IBM Spectrum Virtualize - all in a powerful 2U enterprise-class storage system. Providing intensive data driven multicloud storage capacity, FlashSystem 9100 is deeply integrated with the software defined capabilities of IBM Spectrum Storage allowing you to easily add in the multicloud solutions that best support your business.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe was previously known as IBM FlashSystem 9100, FlashSystem 9100.

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Video

IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Pricing Advice

What users are saying about IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe pricing:
  • "It's a lot less costly than cloud storage. People get surprised by the cost of cloud storage, which is extremely expensive and four or five times the cost of storage on-premises. People don't realize what they're spending on storage until they start getting bills from Amazon, Microsoft, and others. This is a good way to reduce your cloud storage expenses."
  • "There are pricing options from the mid-rand to the high-range, of which the suitability depends upon the requirements."
  • IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe Reviews

    Filter by:
    Filter Reviews
    Industry
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Company Size
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Job Level
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Rating
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Considered
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Order by:
    Loading...
    • Date
    • Highest Rating
    • Lowest Rating
    • Review Length
    Search:
    Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
    Greg Brown - PeerSpot reviewer
    Consulting Client Executive at Jeskell Systems, LLC
    Real User
    Top 20
    A game-changer product that doesn't fail, and as compared to the prior generation products, takes about 20% of space and uses about 85% less energy
    Pros and Cons
    • "A key feature is that compared to storage systems that we've been familiar with over decades, IBM simply does not fail. The reason is that IBM is the only manufacturer that engineers its own flash module, and there is a key architectural difference from everything else that we have seen in the market. The difference is that the flash module has the computational capability, which allows reliability and capacity enhancements to be uploaded from the main controllers and run in each module. So, each of the flash drives becomes its own little storage system, and that is extremely effective architecture. In this field, with this type of system, IBM has made a statement. They've never had one of these modules cause an outage. So, the failure rates on these things are just in a whole different universe from what we were accustomed to."
    • "I'd like to be able to connect to tape drives behind the storage device to back up the tape if need be. We have all of our storage running in all-flash, and we make a copy on tape. Currently, when we want to hook up tape drives, we have to add some extra equipment, which is a little bit complex. We want IBM to add a feature where we could install a tape into the storage so that we can connect it through a single pane of glass. We'd like to have a feature in the IBM flash storage system so that we can connect backup tape drives through the IBM storage system and we can manage the backup tape from the storage system."

    What is our primary use case?

    Our use case for on-premises is to improve performance. In our data center, we're using FlashSystem 9150s. We have two of them. In our customer projects, we have over two dozen of every model installed, including the 5200 and the 7200. So, we have the complete range of FlashSystems installed.

    It can be deployed on-prem, on a public cloud, or in a hybrid cloud combination derivative. The cloud provider can be AWS, Microsoft Azure, and of course, IBM Cloud.

    How has it helped my organization?

    It improves performance 2:1 or better. It also saves space by 80%. It takes only about 20% of the space that prior generation products took. 

    It uses about 85% less energy, which is a big deal, and it also protects against cyber threats and ransomware.

    When it runs on the virtual machines in the public cloud, or it runs on-premises, you get about three times the capacity in the public cloud than you would get by using the storage that a cloud provider offers. It is not a well-known secret, except for the people who have to pay the bills for storage in the public cloud. Public cloud storage is very expensive. It is much more expensive than storage on site. So, being able to reduce the cost of public cloud storage by two-thirds is a big deal, and this product allows you to do that, which is an advantage.

    It is smaller, and it uses less energy. It puts less into the data center, which is a big deal. Heat is a big issue in data centers, and the larger the data center scales, the more is heat. Because there are no moving parts and no motors, and they use so much less electricity, these systems don't dump a lot of heat into the computer room. That is really important because as your data centers scale-out as companies grow, the heat in the data center starts to limit the ability to have air conditioning power and the amount of storage you can put in the data center. One of the big advantages of this technology is that it runs so cool and uses so little power. I've walked in a lot of data centers, and people have fans running to even off hotspots, and they're running big chillers. There is one data center nearby, and when you get within a block or two of that, you can hear the cooling systems. The cooling systems are taller than the building. They're in a big, chain-link cage mounted out in the parking lot, and they're just roaring all the time trying to take the heat out of the data center. The best way to solve that problem is not to put the heat into the data center in the first place.

    What is most valuable?

    A key feature is that compared to storage systems that we've been familiar with over decades, IBM simply does not fail. The reason is that IBM is the only manufacturer that engineers its own flash module, and there is a key architectural difference from everything else that we have seen in the market. The difference is that the flash module has the computational capability, which allows reliability and capacity enhancements to be uploaded from the main controllers and run in each module. So, each of the flash drives becomes its own little storage system, and that is extremely effective architecture. In this field, with this type of system, IBM has made a statement. They've never had one of these modules cause an outage. So, the failure rates on these things are just in a whole different universe from what we were accustomed to. With hard drives, you have to plan on failures consistently, and you have to have rebuilds going on. Hard drives are mechanical, and they fail. With normal flash products, you still have failures because flash wears out when you write to it. It's part of the flash technology, but with IBM's technique, we're able to get the advantage of the flash storage without the reliability and rebuild issues that we had with other flash storage. So, it is extremely effective.

    What needs improvement?

    I'd like to see more ports, although we have found ways of working around it. It's a bit limited on ports for most users. We use it with fiber channel and VME connections. The ports are fiber channel or iSCSI. Everybody uses it, which means running storage over IP connections. The advantage is you can run over an internet protocol (IP) connection.

    I'd like to be able to connect to tape drives behind the storage device to back up the tape if need be. We have all of our storage running in all-flash, and we make a copy on tape. Currently, when we want to hook up tape drives, we have to add some extra equipment, which is a little bit complex. We want IBM to add a feature where we could install a tape into the storage so that we can connect it through a single pane of glass. We'd like to have a feature in the IBM flash storage system so that we can connect backup tape drives through the IBM storage system and we can manage the backup tape from the storage system. We have got all this data in our storage system, but there are a lot of bad people in the world, and they go around corrupting things with ransomware acts and other things. So, we make a full copy of the data on the tape. The tape then goes and sits in a secure storage facility. If something goes horribly wrong, we bring that tape out, we erase all the bad data that was corrupted, and then we lay down our clean data from the tape, and we're back in business. For example, the City of Baltimore was held on ransom for months a couple of years ago. They didn't have that facility. They didn't know how to do that, whereas we do our best practice and we back up all our data to tape, and then that tape gets stored somewhere else so that the bad people can't come in and do ransomware on us.

    Buyer's Guide
    NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: July 2022.
    622,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using this solution for about 18 years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Its stability is excellent.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    There are a limited number of slots, and if you fill those slots, you're going to have to add a second one of these. That's the bad news. The good news is when you do add the second one, you can cluster them and manage them in a system, but it does have a limited number of slots. I don't know if that's a fair criticism because most of the storage systems have that.

    In terms of its usage, we probably have over a dozen user project sites, and that represents about 30 systems in total. We have several installations at federal government sites.

    How are customer service and support?

    Nobody does that better than IBM. They have excellent technical support. I would rate them a four out of five.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before 9100, we used the IBM systems with spinning disks, and they were reliable, but when we saw the flash systems come along with enhanced reliability, compression ratio, and performance, we switched over. We never looked back.

    How was the initial setup?

    It is very easy. We have a few novices, and it is extremely easy. What it comes with today, it didn't have years ago. In the current version, it has all the defaults, meaning you can plug it, and it will immediately satisfy a typical user. There is fine-tuning because when you take a generalized configuration, it is not applicable everywhere. So, there might be a setting that is typical and is good for the majority of cases. Once you get it installed, you can start looking at the defaults, fine-tune it a bit, and tweak it a bit. Because it comes with all the defaults on it, you could basically plug it in and use it. It is very easy to install.

    The product is easy to install, but the data is hard to migrate. That's because when you have any data that lives on existing systems, the data has to be migrated from existing storage. So, the installation part is relatively simple, but how you get the data over from the existing storage can be challenging because you can't have a company go offline while the data is being moved. With the product, IBM provides a data migration facility to simplify the migration and allow applications to stay online while the data is being migrated.

    In terms of maintenance, the machine is extraordinarily easy to maintain. The maintenance of it is almost self-contained, and there are several reasons for that. 

    The first reason is that the modules simply don't fail. The major problem with disk maintenance has always been hard drives failing. Anyone who has had a laptop with a hard drive knows it can fail over time. That's why people back their data up, but with this new technology that IBM has introduced, the modules don't fail anymore. So, if the drives don't fail, the major maintenance issue with storage goes out of the window. 

    Another reason is that IBM provides proactive maintenance. If there is anything that looks out of sorts, they set up parts and service people to fix it before it actually causes a problem at the user site. They have a monitoring system that can see the error rates increasing before the error rates cause an outage. Because of that, it's on proactive maintenance, which is very helpful. When you do replace something, it's just a plugin module, and it doesn't impact the application. So, it will continue to run during the maintenance, and that's really helpful. It is called concurrent maintenance, meaning you can repair something without causing an outage.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    It's a lot less costly than cloud storage. People get surprised by the cost of cloud storage, which is extremely expensive and four or five times the cost of storage on-premises. People don't realize what they're spending on storage until they start getting bills from Amazon, Microsoft, and others. This is a good way to reduce your cloud storage expenses.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We're authorized to use products from other companies, but it is just that there are so many compelling reasons to use IBM. It is a unique product. Nothing else in the market is quite like it. Sometimes, different isn't good, but in this case, different is good.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice would be to keep the code current. Every four or five months, IBM has a code update, and I would advise others to keep their product current. You should basically set it, forget it, and enjoy it. People who run competitive systems would be shocked because it's so different, yet it's just hugely better than the stuff we've had in the past. 

    This is a good way to reduce your cloud storage expenses. Everybody is migrating to the cloud or thinking of migrating to the cloud, and truly, if the cloud was perfect, nobody needs a data center. You don't need your own electrical generation facility. You get power from the public utility that provides the power. Public cloud can also provide good storage capabilities, but we're at the beginning of that capability, and because it's imperfect and it's expensive, people still need data centers. We have to deal with the limitations of the public cloud, which are performance, cost, and complexity. If you're a business that can't afford to be down, do you really want to hand that to some third party? That's why the credit card companies and the financial service companies and people who have to be online 24/7 worldwide don't run those things in the cloud. They run them in on-premise data centers. On the other hand, a lot of customers are migrating to the cloud or are somewhere in the journey. They are either at the beginning of the journey or in the middle of that journey. For them, this is a big help because they can run in the hybrid mode so that things that make sense in the cloud are in the cloud, and the things that make sense on-premises are on-premises.

    I would rate it a nine out of 10. The product is a game-changer. IBM changed the game architecturally by moving computational resources into the flash media. Different isn't always better, but in this case, it is. In the industry today, only IBM has a product with a true scale-out storage architecture. All other systems use media that is just a big cousin to the media in your laptop. It just stores data. IBM not only stores data, but it also has the computational resource that does compression, reliability, and deduplication.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Mohamed_Hassan - PeerSpot reviewer
    Microfinance at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 5
    Good performance, easy to manage, and remains stable even during maintenance
    Pros and Cons
      • "I would like to have replication functionality built directly in the product, rather than having to use a separate device for this."

      What is our primary use case?

      The FlashSystem is currently hosting all of our applications and services.

      How has it helped my organization?

      The performance of each server was improved when we implemented this product. The IOPS rate is high with flash storage, compared to other types of disks.

      What is most valuable?

      The administration is easy and very straightforward. It is the same software for managing both flash and non-flash storage. It can be managed using either the GUI or the command-line interface.

      It is a high-performance product that serves our requests well.

      The IBM Professional Services give us technical support that is both timely and of high quality.

      What needs improvement?

      I would like to have replication functionality built directly in the product, rather than having to use a separate device for this.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      We have been using the IBM FlashSystem A9000 for nearly eight months.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      This is a very stable product during daily operation, maintenance, and even while upgrading the firmware. It comes configured from IBM with one controller and after testing it for perhaps an hour, the firmware will be updated and the other controller will take over. Then, the next phase begins.

      At this point, it again tests the system for about an hour, and then the other controller is updated. There is no downtime, availability is not affected, and it remains stable. 

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      It is possible to both scale-up and scale-out, and it depends on the needs of the business. If I need more capacity then it's easy, and this is true even if I need more performance.

      How are customer service and technical support?

      The technical support is very good.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      Prior to using the A9000, we were using the V9000 for nearly two years.

      Before moving to IBM, were work working with the EMC VMAX storage array. I was not the decision-maker who decided to switch, although it may have been related to cost.

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial setup is easy and not complicated.

      From scratch, the Rack and Stack take perhaps two days, and the configuration of the system takes an additional day.

      What about the implementation team?

      The setup is completed by IBM, although we are involved in the post-installation knowledge transfer.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      There are pricing options from the mid-rand to the high-range, of which the suitability depends upon the requirements.

      What other advice do I have?

      Overall, I think that this is a good product and I recommend it.

      I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
      PeerSpot user
      Buyer's Guide
      NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
      July 2022
      Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: July 2022.
      622,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.
      Gencys Segarra - PeerSpot reviewer
      General Manager at SinergyHard Ecuador
      Real User
      Top 10
      Scalable with good visualization and flash copy capabilities
      Pros and Cons
      • "The high performance and high availability improved our overall processes."
      • "Other vendors have included a block and file system. IBM doesn't include a file system. And yet, it's very necessary for all organizations' networks to have file systems. We have other systems for the file system, however, ideally, we would like to have one system with these features."

      What is our primary use case?

      We primarily use the solution for the database.

      How has it helped my organization?

      The high performance and high availability improved our overall processes.

      What is most valuable?

      The visualization, flash copy, and HyperSwap are the solution's most valuable features. The visualization in particular is stellar. It's very, very easy to use.

      What needs improvement?

      Other vendors have included a block and file system. IBM doesn't include a file system. And yet, it's very necessary for all organizations' networks to have file systems. We have other systems for the file system, however, ideally, we would like to have one system with all the features we need instead of having different solutions for certain aspects.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      Although I had been using the solution previously, I stopped using the solution about six months ago.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      The solution is very stable. It's reliable. We never had a problem with bugs or glitches. It never froze on us.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      The system is very scalable. It's actually too much for our entire organization. We don't need the level of scalability offered.

      At the time of the implementation, the FlashSystem had over 5,000 users.

      How are customer service and technical support?

      Technical support is very good. Overall, I'd rate it nine out of ten. They could guarantee the time it would take to provide answers, however, so that we know when to expect results and aren't waiting on them to respond.

      In terms of replacing parts, it would be nice if they could say something like "this will take us two days or two hours". It would help us manage expectations for turnaround.

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial setup is very easy and very quick. It's not too complex. We found it to be rather straightforward.

      The advantage of FlashSystem is the stellar visualization of data integration. We deployed the solution very quickly due to the fact that, when the system was implemented, the migration was transparent. The tools make everything very clear for the user.

      What other advice do I have?

      IBM FlashSystem is an excellent product. That said, I don't recommend it to vendors due to the fact that IBM doesn't have a file system. For the operator, it's difficult to work with different types of storage. Again, we need to have one solution, one software that encapsulates everything, and right now, IBM is missing the file system.

      On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the solution at a nine.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
      PeerSpot user
      AdeelAkhtar - PeerSpot reviewer
      Team Lead IT Infrastructure & Datacenter at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
      Real User
      Simple, easy-to-use and scalable with a good UI
      Pros and Cons
      • "Good performance with a user-friendly UI."
      • "Deduplication and compression should be improved."

      What is our primary use case?

      We use this solution for virtual infrastructure for our core system and we run Hypervisor on top of it. I'm team lead, IT infrastructure, and I work in a financial institution. 

      What is most valuable?

      The performance of this solution is good and they have a user-friendly UI. When we're working with a small volume without needing much compression and deduplication, FlashSystem works well. It's a simple, easy-to-use solution that is scalable. 

      What needs improvement?

      We're not satisfied with the deduplication and compression for our volumes. When we enable those features, we assess issues like virtual machine performance which is quite a complex thing to do with FlashSystem. We'd like to have better technical support because they ask lots of questions when we could just have a remote session and resolve the issue. I'd like to see application level integration with Microsoft Hyper-V integration with the IBM Storages in the next upgrade.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I've been using this solution for five years. 

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      The stability is good. 

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      We are running over 400 virtual machines so the product is scalable. It's being used by internal and external users and we have our digital products -- internet banking, ATMs -- on this storage. 

      How are customer service and support?

      IBM needs to increase its technical support. The support mechanism is very complex compared to their competitors.

      How would you rate customer service and support?

      Positive

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial setup is very simple. If fiber connectivity is good between storage and sensor chips, deployment will take a day. We had an IBM engineer implement the solution. 

      What was our ROI?

      You get value for money, because the product is good in terms of control failure. In general, it gives us peace of mind but we have an issue with their support because they don't handle our issues very well.

      What other advice do I have?

      We're looking to explore other solutions, and what they offer in terms of price and features. I recommend this solution but if you have the need for good compression and deduplication features, then I would suggest checking out other solutions. IBM is only good if you don't depend significantly on those two aspects. 

      I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
      Flag as inappropriate
      PeerSpot user
      Aliyar Balikci - PeerSpot reviewer
      Information Technology Senior Administrator at Genpa
      Real User
      Top 5Leaderboard
      Good performance but technical support needs improvement
      Pros and Cons
      • "It's easy to use, has good stability, and many features."
      • "IBM's support is not good. I experienced a big problem where I opened the console IBM Storage and would see that something was broken. I called the call centers, and I said, "I have a problem. My drive is not working." They want me to give them the serial number, I gave it to them and they told me "I cannot find your product. Your product is not here.""

      What needs improvement?

      The prices are high. Except for this, there is nothing I don't like in FlashSystem. Before IBM Flash, I was using NetApp 2020. You can't easily do what you want to do with NetApp. It takes more time to take snapshots, it takes more time to do deduplication. 

      FlashSystem is better than the old system. I recommend it to my friends who ask what to pick.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe for about three years.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      FlashSystem doesn't have any limitations. 

      How are customer service and technical support?

      IBM's support is not good. I experienced a big problem where I opened the console IBM Storage and would see that something was broken. I called the call centers, and I said, "I have a problem. My drive is not working." They want me to give them the serial number, I gave it to them and they told me "I cannot find your product. Your product is not here."

      It was unbelievable. I had purchased it a week prior. I was the first person in Turkey to buy it. They said they couldn't help me. I ended up fixing it myself. 

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      Before buying IBM Flash, I tested many flash storage solutions. For example, I tested Pure Storage for about one and a half months, Huawei Storage, and Dell Storage. I tested and compared the performance results. 

      I also tested Iometer. When we run the Imeter on NetApp, the performance result is not the same. It immediately goes down and suddenly, goes up. It's not stable. But when we were testing Pure Storage, we found it to be very good. It's stable. It goes on the same line. When I tested Dell Storage and removed the controller or hard drive manually I saw the performance go down. Dell goes down, and Huawei goes down. When I did the same test on Pure Storage,  the performance was near the same. Because of this, I would recommend Pure Storage. I plan to buy it when I have the budget for it. 

      What other advice do I have?

      I would rate IBM FlashSystem a seven out of ten. The performance is good but the support is not. It's easy to use, has good stability, and many features. 

      Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
      PeerSpot user
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Report and find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp, and more!
      Updated: July 2022
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Report and find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp, and more!