Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo

Top 10 Fortinet FortiGate-VM Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
4.2 out of 5
532 followers
Start review

Top Fortinet FortiGate-VM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortinet FortiGate-VM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Netgate pfSense, OPNsense, and Sophos XG. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Fortinet FortiGate-VM surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat protection, seamless integration with cloud environments, and robust performance, delivering enhanced security and scalability for businesses seeking reliable virtual firewall solutions in diverse infrastructures.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense offers essential firewall capabilities and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels with advanced security features including deep packet inspection. Netgate pfSense is favored for strong customer support, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides premium-tier support services tailored for complex environments.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Netgate pfSense Report
Netgate pfSense is praised for its low initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM incurs higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense is praised for its low initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM incurs higher setup expenses.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels with advanced threat protection, high performance, and integration capabilities. In comparison, OPNsense specializes in open-source flexibility and extensive plugins. Fortinet FortiGate-VM suits enterprises needing robust features, while OPNsense appeals to users valuing customization and cost-effective setups.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. OPNsense Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a higher setup cost compared to OPNsense. OPNsense is more cost-effective for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a higher setup cost compared to OPNsense. OPNsense is more cost-effective for initial deployment.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Sophos XG
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Sophos XG
4.0 out of 5
Sophos XG excels in synchronized security and simplified site deployment, appealing to businesses needing seamless integration and application control. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers robust firewall capabilities and SD-WAN, ideal for enterprises focusing on hybrid cloud environments and scalable performance.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has a straightforward setup cost, ideal for businesses seeking streamlined deployment. In contrast, Fortinet FortiGate-VM's installation can be more complex but provides comprehensive features for enterprise-grade deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a straightforward setup cost, ideal for businesses seeking streamlined deployment. In contrast, Fortinet FortiGate-VM's installation can be more complex but provides comprehensive features for enterprise-grade deployment.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall excels in threat intelligence and integration with Cisco products. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM's deep packet inspection and VPN capabilities offer versatility. Cisco's deployment is smoother, while Fortinet presents initial challenges, yet its advanced features justify higher pricing.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Cisco Secure Firewall offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, whereas Fortinet FortiGate-VM tends to require higher upfront investment but can provide greater long-term flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, whereas Fortinet FortiGate-VM tends to require higher upfront investment but can provide greater long-term flexibility.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
4.3 out of 5
FortiGate-VM offers ease of use, versatile security, and cost-effective licensing. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced threat prevention and detailed analytics. Tech buyers seeking affordability might select FortiGate-VM, while those prioritizing sophisticated security features could choose Palo Alto Networks.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a cost-effective setup with scalable options, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls may involve higher initial costs but deliver advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a cost-effective setup with scalable options, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls may involve higher initial costs but deliver advanced security features.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is valued for its ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and UTM capabilities across various cloud environments. In comparison, Check Point NGFW excels in advanced security management, supporting extensive networks with sophisticated threat analysis.
Download Check Point NGFW vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Check Point NGFW, which offers more cost-effective implementation without complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Check Point NGFW, which offers more cost-effective implementation without complexity.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
FortiGate-VM excels in robust security features and high performance. In comparison, Azure Firewall stands out for seamless integration with Azure services and scalability. FortiGate-VM could benefit from enhanced analytics. Azure Firewall needs improved threat intelligence and update speed. FortiGate-VM is cost-effective, while Azure Firewall offers superior integration.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a lower initial setup cost, making it suitable for smaller budgets, while Azure Firewall features a higher installation expense, reflecting its advanced capabilities and integration with other Azure services.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a lower initial setup cost, making it suitable for smaller budgets, while Azure Firewall features a higher installation expense, reflecting its advanced capabilities and integration with other Azure services.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides secure SD-WAN, advanced threat protection, and integration with other Fortinet products. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers unified threat management, easy configuration, and strong endpoint security. WatchGuard Firebox is simpler to manage, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in advanced security integration.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM users report higher initial setup costs, while WatchGuard Firebox users find the setup costs more affordable.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM users report higher initial setup costs, while WatchGuard Firebox users find the setup costs more affordable.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers robust security features and cost-effectiveness with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM's advanced threat protection and scalability justify its higher initial cost. While Juniper is noted for easier setup, Fortinet delivers higher long-term value due to its comprehensive features.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall Report
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall has a lower initial setup cost than the Fortinet FortiGate-VM. The Fortinet FortiGate-VM, however, offers a more comprehensive initial feature set, which may justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall has a lower initial setup cost than the Fortinet FortiGate-VM. The Fortinet FortiGate-VM, however, offers a more comprehensive initial feature set, which may justify its higher setup cost.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa offers advanced threat protection, VPN support, and ease of setup, appealing to those valuing straightforward deployment. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides superior intrusion detection, sandboxing, and cloud integration for users prioritizing advanced security features and scalability despite higher complexity.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. SonicWall NSa Report
SonicWall NSa has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiGate-VM, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiGate-VM's cost-effective installation stands out against SonicWall NSa's more premium pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiGate-VM, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiGate-VM's cost-effective installation stands out against SonicWall NSa's more premium pricing.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in pricing and customer support, offering robust security features and configurability. In comparison, Sophos XGS stands out for advanced threat protection and easy configuration. While FortiGate-VM is cost-effective, Sophos XGS justifies its premium price through a superior feature set.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Sophos XGS Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a moderate setup cost, while Sophos XGS is more expensive to set up. Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a cost-efficient option, contrasting with the higher setup investment required for Sophos XGS.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a moderate setup cost, while Sophos XGS is more expensive to set up. Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a cost-efficient option, contrasting with the higher setup investment required for Sophos XGS.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Untangle NG Firewall offers an intuitive management experience and effective device handling, making it ideal for ease of use. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in advanced security and integration capabilities, appealing to those needing comprehensive network management and willing to invest more for extensive features.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Untangle NG Firewall Report
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM tends to be more expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM tends to be more expensive.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
KerioControl is valued for affordability, simple configuration, and strong VPN capabilities. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM stands out with extensive firewall features and integration capabilities. KerioControl offers cost-effectiveness, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM delivers substantial ROI with advanced features.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. KerioControl Report
KerioControl has higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM has lower initial pricing, offering a more affordable deployment option.
View comparison
Pricing
KerioControl has higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM has lower initial pricing, offering a more affordable deployment option.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
FortiGate-VM offers robust security with UTM capabilities, ideal for comprehensive network protection. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF focuses on cost-effective features, offering strong application control. FortiGate's premium solutions suit those seeking advanced ecosystems, while Sangfor appeals to budget-conscious buyers seeking straightforward configurations.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Sangfor NGAF Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a moderate setup cost, while Sangfor NGAF presents a more cost-effective setup option. Fortinet offers advanced features, whereas Sangfor focuses on affordability and simplicity in its deployment process.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a moderate setup cost, while Sangfor NGAF presents a more cost-effective setup option. Fortinet offers advanced features, whereas Sangfor focuses on affordability and simplicity in its deployment process.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is recognized for advanced threat prevention and integration capabilities. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in secure SD-WAN and cloud compatibility. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series stands out for deployment ease, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM is favored for budget-friendly pricing and ROI.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series Report
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiGate-VM, which offers a more affordable implementation option.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiGate-VM, which offers a more affordable implementation option.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in threat detection and integration, offering robust scalability and a user-friendly experience. In comparison, Huawei NGFW stands out with advanced threat intelligence and comprehensive policy management, providing enhanced support and justifying a higher investment for its advanced capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Huawei NGFW Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a higher setup cost compared to Huawei NGFW. Despite its higher setup cost, FortiGate-VM offers advanced security features not available with Huawei NGFW.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a higher setup cost compared to Huawei NGFW. Despite its higher setup cost, FortiGate-VM offers advanced security features not available with Huawei NGFW.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Forcepoint excels in advanced threat protection and integration, making it a strong option for managing multiple threat vectors efficiently. In comparison, FortiGate-VM offers comprehensive security features and detailed monitoring tools, appealing to buyers needing exhaustive security measures. Forcepoint emphasizes ease of deployment, whereas FortiGate-VM focuses on performance optimization.
Download Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has an easier initial setup with lower costs, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM involves a more complex setup, leading to higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has an easier initial setup with lower costs, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM involves a more complex setup, leading to higher setup expenses.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers comprehensive threat protection and intuitive management, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides advanced threat detection and high performance, justifying a higher cost. Barracuda’s easy deployment is advantageous, whereas Fortinet’s extensive features deliver substantial ROI.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a lower initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiGate-VM. Fortinet FortiGate-VM's higher setup cost may be justified by its additional features and advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a lower initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiGate-VM. Fortinet FortiGate-VM's higher setup cost may be justified by its additional features and advanced capabilities.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard impresses with advanced threat prevention and unified management, offering comprehensive security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in high-performance security and integration flexibility. Check Point provides robust threat management, while Fortinet offers quicker deployment and cost-effectiveness with faster ROI.
Download Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a relatively higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a relatively higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Cisco IOS Security
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Cisco IOS Security
4.0 out of 5
Cisco IOS Security offers cost-effective network protection and responsive customer support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in comprehensive threat protection and advanced reporting tools. Cisco is ideal for users prioritizing straightforward deployment, while Fortinet appeals to those seeking extensive security features.
Download Cisco IOS Security vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Cisco IOS Security users report higher initial setup costs, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM users mention lower setup expenses. Fortinet FortiGate-VM is praised for its cost-effective installation process compared to Cisco IOS Security.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco IOS Security users report higher initial setup costs, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM users mention lower setup expenses. Fortinet FortiGate-VM is praised for its cost-effective installation process compared to Cisco IOS Security.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Juniper vSRX excels with easier deployment and responsive support, offering comprehensive security and quick ROI. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides a robust feature set and long-term benefits despite higher costs, featuring advanced threat protection and better long-term service.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Juniper vSRX Report
Juniper vSRX setup cost is generally lower than Fortinet FortiGate-VM, highlighting a cost-efficient option for initial deployment in network security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper vSRX setup cost is generally lower than Fortinet FortiGate-VM, highlighting a cost-efficient option for initial deployment in network security solutions.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
SonicWall NSv
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
SonicWall NSv
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM outshines with advanced threat protection, high scalability, and seamless integration. In comparison, SonicWall NSv excels in robust performance and flexible deployment. FortiGate-VM’s superior customer service contrasts with SonicWall NSv's mixed reviews, influencing tech buyers' decisions based on support and usability needs.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. SonicWall NSv Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has higher initial setup costs compared to SonicWall NSv, making it a more expensive option at the outset. On the other hand, SonicWall NSv is noted for its cost-effective setup, offering significant savings.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has higher initial setup costs compared to SonicWall NSv, making it a more expensive option at the outset. On the other hand, SonicWall NSv is noted for its cost-effective setup, offering significant savings.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
GajShield Next Generation Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is known for advanced features, threat detection, and ease of deployment. In comparison, GajShield Next Generation Firewall offers superior features and comprehensive control at a higher cost, deemed justified due to its advanced threat intelligence and reliable performance.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. GajShield Next Generation Firewall Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a lower setup cost compared to the GajShield Next Generation Firewall, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a lower setup cost compared to the GajShield Next Generation Firewall, which requires a higher initial investment.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
H3C SecPath Firewalls
1 out of 5

H3C SecPath F5000 series is the new-generation high-performance firewalls for large-scale enterprise campus networks, service providers, and data centers.

View comparison
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
AhnLab TrusGuard
1 out of 5

AhnLab TrusGuard integrates firewall, IPS, VPN, anti-virus, and anti-spam security features with a unique self-defense system against DDoS attacks. It is designed for efficient and secure connectivity with internal systems through an IPSec/SSL VPN. AhnLab offers a full lineup of TrusGuard to protect any business environment, including TrusGuard 22000 for full-scale, customizable corporate network security.

View comparison

Related categories

Firewalls
Cisco Security Portfolio
Unified Threat Management (UTM)