We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate-VM and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is highly regarded for its robust security features, including geofencing, IPS, antivirus, and a user-friendly interface. Additionally, it is praised for its strong firewall capabilities. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is appreciated for its ease of use and intuitive interface. It is also valued for its reliable support, site-to-site VPN functionality, and effective firewall protection.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has room for improvement in several areas including key activation, internal log management, cloud management, monitoring tools, hardening, availability, clustering, throughput, customization, pricing model, troubleshooting forum, and guidance. Juniper SRX Series Firewall requires improvements in capacity limitations, pricing strategy, reporting and alerts, user interface, device reliability, documentation, and feature enhancements.
Service and Support: The customer service for Fortinet FortiGate-VM has mixed feedback. Some customers appreciate the fast response and expertise of the support team, while others believe there is room for improvement. Customers generally express contentment with the customer service of Juniper SRX Series Firewall, finding the support to be valuable and prompt. Nonetheless, there have been occasions where response times were slower.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is generally simple and user-friendly, with users noting its ease of deployment. The initial setup for Juniper SRX Series Firewall can be completed relatively quickly for small-scale branch offices yet may require more time for complex environments. While some users found it to be effortless and plug-and-play, others mentioned a learning curve and the necessity of CLI experience.
Pricing: The setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is flexible and reasonable, offering choices for yearly or monthly licenses. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is priced in the middle, with a generally straightforward setup cost.
ROI: Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides enhanced security and stability, resulting in a high ROI rating from users. It is crucial to select the appropriate size initially to ensure a favorable return on investment. Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers reliability, uptime, and advanced security features, leading to a positive ROI for users.
Comparison Results: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is the preferred choice over Juniper SRX Series Firewall. Customers appreciate Fortinet FortiGate-VM for its robust security features, user-friendly nature, effortless deployment, and intuitive interface. The product also stands out for its exceptional support provided during deployment.
"Secure, user-friendly, stable, and scalable network security solution. Installation is straightforward."
"The pricing is great and very reasonable."
"FortiGate is on the cheaper end, and it offers good value."
"The most valuable features of the solution are SD-WAN, filtering testing applications, web filtering, and the new VPN."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiGate is the simple configuration."
"It can expand easily."
"It increases security posture and is helpful for firewall reporting, intrusion protection, web filtering, and SD-WAN implementation."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"Fortinet FortiGate-VM is very easy to create the user of VPN, allowing them to use it quickly. Additionally, the integration and interface are good."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"It is easy to set up the solution."
"The solution integrates well with other Fortinet products."
"The ease of access and user-friendly setup is a valuable feature. Fortinet proves to be particularly straightforward to configure, offering simplicity without complexity. Moreover, visibility is easily attainable due to certain factors. Price, implementation, and budget considerations play a role. When it comes to Cisco implementation, the process tends to be more intricate, which many customers find unfavourable for their business needs."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate-VM are the ease of use, IPS system, application filter, web filtering, and email security. Additionally, there is a migration tool that other vendors do not provide. We only need to upload the configuration file to the tool, and it converts everything, except the passwords, and gives us the new configuration, which we can directly upload on the firewall. This migration process takes a maximum of 15 minutes."
"I've found the UTM features and the SD-WAN to be most valuable."
"The thing that I like the most is that they're very willing to work with us to resolve issues that they haven't taken care of before in their product."
"The most valuable features of the Juniper SRX Series Firewall are the user-friendly UI, and accessing the solution is simple."
"The main features are safeguarding their data and ensuring robust security services for organizational data."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper SRX is that it is plug-and-play. Additionally, it has a lot of capabilities in one device."
"The solution is relatively easy and inexpensive to maintain."
"We're primarily using Juniper's EPA feature, but not the other things. We use it to manage different points of firewalling of routing."
"The IPS functionality of Juniper SRX is useful in the telecom industry."
"The technical support is quite good."
"It is a part of the infrastructure when we're selling Juniper. That's what clients are familiar with and that's what they rely on."
"Usually, we sell the bundle with the UTM or threat management piece with IPS, IDS. Other providers, such as Palo Alto, are ahead in terms of safe functionality. So, for me, delivering truly safe service is probably something that still needs to be improved."
"The support from Fortinet FortiGate could improve. They are not easily accessible when we need them. They could improve their response time."
"The routing capability on the FortiGate devices has room for improvement."
"Fortinet FortiGate needs to improve the logging and reporting. Additionally, the next-generation application's policies should be improved. When they were released they had bugs."
"When we cluster the two Fortinet FortiGate boxes together we have some issues."
"There are some complex administration tasks in their administration portal. That needs to be improved."
"There are mainly two areas of improvement in Fortinet FortiGate— the licensing cost and the timing of upgrading licenses for boxes."
"I would prefer to have more detailed logs within the FortiGate products themselves rather than relying on a separate tool."
"Technical support could be better."
"There is always room for improvement in any solutions, including Fortinet's FortiGate-VM. Although the solution claims to have a superior throughput compared to other OEMs, upon closer examination and comparison, there is potential for significant improvement in this area. In today's rapidly evolving technology world, it is important to continuously strive for enhancement and development, and I believe Fortinet can make significant strides in this direction for the FortiGate-VM."
"The log settings and filters could use some improvement."
"There should be integration with an active directory — with Microsoft."
"Sizing can be challenging for customers interested in using Fortinet FortiGate-VM."
"The operating system isn't stable, so it goes to memory counters every night."
"We'd like to have more customization and easier customization of policies."
"Areas for improvement would be application control and web filtering."
"Juniper SRX could improve by adding an IPX feature."
"J-Web, Juniper Web, is sometimes not working great when users are increasing their internet use. Additionally, they need to improve the GUI, graphical user interface, and the firewall management needs to improve. Their CLI is good, but sometimes the GUI is very slow."
"The pricing strategy of the vendor could improve."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"It does have its nuances in terms of deployment. There are always areas to make something easier or more intuitive or make the system auto-negotiate more with existing hardware."
"I think improvement can be done to the security part, particularly the UDM, and the product should have a user-friendly interface similar to FortiGate. It should have the Azure RBAC in the next release."
"I think Juniper SRX should have a GUI. Some of the competitors are already implementing GUI for the firewall."
"Both the web management and the graphical user interface are inadequate and should be improved."
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is ranked 8th in Firewalls with 27 reviews while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 18th in Firewalls with 19 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate-VM is rated 8.8, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate-VM writes "Flexible with good cloud management and a straightforward user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Useful telecom industry functionality, simple deployment, but lacking features". Fortinet FortiGate-VM is most compared with Azure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, Fortinet FortiOS, OPNsense and Netgate pfSense, whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and Check Point NGFW. See our Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.